Suppr超能文献

胎盘是否存在微生物菌群?对已发表的胎盘微生物菌群数据集的批判性回顾和再分析。

Is there a placental microbiota? A critical review and re-analysis of published placental microbiota datasets.

机构信息

Pregnancy Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Detroit, MI, USA.

Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

BMC Microbiol. 2023 Mar 18;23(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-02764-6.

Abstract

The existence of a placental microbiota is debated. The human placenta has historically been considered sterile and microbial colonization was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Yet, recent DNA sequencing investigations reported a microbiota in typical human term placentas. However, this detected microbiota could represent background DNA or delivery-associated contamination. Using fifteen publicly available 16S rRNA gene datasets, existing data were uniformly re-analyzed with DADA2 to maximize comparability. While Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) identified as Lactobacillus, a typical vaginal bacterium, were highly abundant and prevalent across studies, this prevalence disappeared after applying likely  DNA contaminant removal to placentas from term cesarean deliveries. A six-study sub-analysis targeting the 16S rRNA gene V4 hypervariable region demonstrated that bacterial profiles of placental samples and technical controls share principal bacterial ASVs and that placental samples clustered primarily by study origin and mode of delivery. Contemporary DNA-based evidence does not support the existence of a placental microbiota.ImportanceEarly-gestational microbial influences on human development are unclear. By applying DNA sequencing technologies to placental tissue, bacterial DNA signals were observed, leading some to conclude that a live bacterial placental microbiome exists in typical term pregnancy. However, the low-biomass nature of the proposed microbiome and high sensitivity of current DNA sequencing technologies indicate that the signal may alternatively derive from environmental or delivery-associated bacterial DNA contamination. Here we address these alternatives with a re-analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequencing data from 15 publicly available placental datasets. After identical DADA2 pipeline processing of the raw data, subanalyses were performed to control for mode of delivery and environmental DNA contamination. Both environment and mode of delivery profoundly influenced the bacterial DNA signal from term-delivered placentas. Aside from these contamination-associated signals, consistency was lacking across studies. Thus, placentas delivered at term are unlikely to be the original source of observed bacterial DNA signals.

摘要

胎盘微生物群的存在存在争议。历史上,人类胎盘被认为是无菌的,微生物定植与不良妊娠结局有关。然而,最近的 DNA 测序研究报告了典型的人类足月胎盘微生物群。然而,这种检测到的微生物群可能代表背景 DNA 或与分娩相关的污染。使用十五个公开可用的 16S rRNA 基因数据集,使用 DADA2 对现有数据进行了统一的重新分析,以最大限度地提高可比性。虽然鉴定为阴道细菌的典型乳酸菌的扩增子序列变异(ASV)在研究中高度丰富且普遍存在,但在对足月剖宫产胎盘应用可能的 DNA 污染物去除后,这种普遍性就消失了。一项针对 16S rRNA 基因 V4 高变区的六项研究子分析表明,胎盘样本和技术对照的细菌谱共享主要的细菌 ASV,胎盘样本主要按研究来源和分娩方式聚类。当代基于 DNA 的证据并不支持胎盘微生物群的存在。

重要性

人类发育早期的微生物影响尚不清楚。通过将 DNA 测序技术应用于胎盘组织,观察到细菌 DNA 信号,这导致一些人得出结论,即在典型的足月妊娠中存在活的细菌胎盘微生物组。然而,拟议的微生物组的低生物量性质和当前 DNA 测序技术的高灵敏度表明,该信号可能替代地源自环境或与分娩相关的细菌 DNA 污染。在这里,我们通过对 15 个公开可用的胎盘数据集的 16S rRNA 基因测序数据进行重新分析来解决这些替代方案。对原始数据进行相同的 DADA2 处理后,进行了亚分析以控制分娩方式和环境 DNA 污染。环境和分娩方式都对足月分娩胎盘的细菌 DNA 信号产生了深远的影响。除了这些与污染相关的信号外,研究之间缺乏一致性。因此,足月分娩的胎盘不太可能是观察到的细菌 DNA 信号的原始来源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3422/10024458/c37acd9a00a5/12866_2023_2764_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验