Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland, and Detroit, Michigan, USA.
mSphere. 2020 May 6;5(3):e00210-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00210-20.
The prevailing paradigm in obstetrics has been the sterile womb hypothesis. However, some are asserting that the placenta, intra-amniotic environment, and fetus harbor microbial communities. The objective of this study was to determine whether the fetal and placental tissues of rhesus macaques harbor bacterial communities. Fetal, placental, and uterine wall samples were obtained from cesarean deliveries without labor (∼130/166 days gestation). The presence of bacteria in the fetal intestine and placenta was investigated through culture. The bacterial burden and profiles of the placenta, umbilical cord, and fetal brain, heart, liver, and colon were determined through quantitative real-time PCR and DNA sequencing. These data were compared with those of the uterine wall as well as to negative and positive technical controls. Bacterial cultures of fetal and placental tissues yielded only a single colony of This bacterium was detected at a low relative abundance (0.02%) in the 16S rRNA gene profile of the villous tree sample from which it was cultured, yet it was also identified in 12/29 background technical controls. The bacterial burden and profiles of fetal and placental tissues did not exceed or differ from those of background technical controls. By contrast, the bacterial burden and profiles of positive controls exceeded and differed from those of background controls. Among the macaque samples, distinct microbial signals were limited to the uterine wall. Therefore, using multiple modes of microbiologic inquiry, there was not consistent evidence of bacterial communities in the fetal and placental tissues of rhesus macaques. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (i.e., intra-amniotic infection) has been causally linked to pregnancy complications, especially preterm birth. Therefore, if the placenta and the fetus are typically populated by low-biomass microbial communities, current understanding of the role of microbes in reproduction and pregnancy outcomes will need to be fundamentally reconsidered. Could these communities be of benefit by competitively excluding potential pathogens or priming the fetal immune system for the microbial bombardment it will experience upon delivery? If so, what properties (e.g., microbial load and community membership) of these microbial communities preclude versus promote intra-amniotic infection? Given the ramifications of the colonization hypothesis, critical evaluation is required. In this study, using multiple modes of microbiologic inquiry (i.e., culture, quantitative real-time PCR [qPCR], and DNA sequencing) and controlling for potential background DNA contamination, we did not find consistent evidence for microbial communities in the placental and fetal tissues of rhesus macaques.
在产科领域,占主导地位的范式一直是无菌子宫假说。然而,一些人断言胎盘、羊膜内环境和胎儿都存在微生物群落。本研究的目的是确定猕猴的胎儿和胎盘组织是否存在细菌群落。通过剖宫产术(妊娠约 130/166 天)获得无分娩的胎儿、胎盘和子宫壁样本。通过培养研究胎儿肠道和胎盘内细菌的存在。通过定量实时 PCR 和 DNA 测序确定胎盘、脐带和胎儿大脑、心脏、肝脏和结肠的细菌负荷和谱。将这些数据与子宫壁以及阴性和阳性技术对照进行比较。胎儿和胎盘组织的细菌培养仅产生单一菌落,该细菌在培养其的绒毛树样本的 16S rRNA 基因谱中以低相对丰度(0.02%)检测到,但也在 12/29 个背景技术对照中鉴定出来。胎儿和胎盘组织的细菌负荷和谱没有超过或不同于背景技术对照。相比之下,阳性对照的细菌负荷和谱超过并不同于背景对照。在猕猴样本中,独特的微生物信号仅限于子宫壁。因此,使用多种微生物学研究模式,没有一致的证据表明猕猴胎儿和胎盘组织中存在细菌群落。羊膜腔(即羊膜内感染)的微生物入侵与妊娠并发症有关,尤其是早产。因此,如果胎盘和胎儿通常被低生物量微生物群落定植,那么当前对微生物在生殖和妊娠结局中的作用的理解将需要从根本上重新考虑。这些群落是否通过竞争性排斥潜在的病原体或为胎儿免疫系统对分娩时将经历的微生物冲击做好准备而有益?如果是这样,这些微生物群落的哪些特性(例如,微生物负荷和群落成员)排除或促进羊膜内感染?鉴于定植假说的影响,需要进行批判性评估。在这项研究中,我们使用多种微生物学研究模式(即培养、定量实时 PCR[qPCR]和 DNA 测序)并控制潜在的背景 DNA 污染,没有发现猕猴胎盘和胎儿组织中微生物群落的一致证据。