Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
mSphere. 2020 Feb 26;5(1):e00933-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00933-19.
The existence of a placental microbiota and colonization of the fetus have been the subjects of recent debate. The objective of this study was to determine whether the placental and fetal tissues of mice harbor bacterial communities. Bacterial profiles of the placenta and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestine samples were characterized through culture, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. These profiles were compared to those of the maternal mouth, lung, liver, uterus, cervix, vagina, and intestine, as well as to background technical controls. Positive bacterial cultures from placental and fetal tissue samples were rare; of the 165 total bacterial cultures of placental tissue samples from the 11 mice included in this study, only nine yielded at least a single colony, and five of those nine positive cultures came from a single mouse. Cultures of fetal intestinal tissue samples yielded just a single bacterial isolate, , a common skin bacterium. Bacterial loads of placental and fetal brain, lung, liver, and intestinal tissues were not higher than those of DNA contamination controls and did not yield substantive 16S rRNA gene sequencing libraries. From all placental or fetal tissue samples ( = 51), there was only a single bacterial isolate that came from a fetal brain sample having a bacterial load higher than that of contamination controls and that was identified in sequence-based surveys of at least one of its corresponding maternal samples. Therefore, using multiple modes of microbiological inquiry, there was not consistent evidence of bacterial communities in the placental and fetal tissues of mice. The prevailing paradigm in obstetrics has been the sterile womb hypothesis, which posits that fetuses are first colonized by microorganisms during the delivery process. However, some are now suggesting that fetuses are consistently colonized by microorganisms from microbial communities that inhabit the placenta and intra-amniotic environment. Given the established causal role of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (i.e., intra-amniotic infection) in pregnancy complications, especially preterm birth, if the colonization hypothesis were true, there are several aspects of current understanding that will need to be reconsidered; these aspects include the magnitude of intra-amniotic microbial load required to cause disease and its potential influence on the ontogeny of the immune system. However, acceptance of the colonization hypothesis is premature. Herein, we do not find consistent evidence for placental and fetal microbiota in mice using culture, qPCR, and DNA sequencing.
胎盘微生物群的存在和胎儿定植一直是最近争论的主题。本研究的目的是确定小鼠的胎盘和胎儿组织是否存在细菌群落。通过培养、定量实时 PCR(qPCR)和 16S rRNA 基因测序来描述胎盘和胎儿大脑、肺、肝和肠样本的细菌特征。将这些图谱与母体口腔、肺、肝、子宫、宫颈、阴道和肠以及背景技术对照进行比较。来自胎盘和胎儿组织样本的阳性细菌培养很少见;在本研究中包括的 11 只小鼠的 165 个胎盘组织细菌培养物中,只有 9 个培养物至少产生了一个单一菌落,其中 5 个阳性培养物来自一只老鼠。胎儿肠道组织样本的培养物仅产生了一个单一的细菌分离物,即一种常见的皮肤细菌。胎盘和胎儿大脑、肺、肝和肠组织的细菌负荷并不高于 DNA 污染对照,也没有产生实质性的 16S rRNA 基因测序文库。从所有胎盘或胎儿组织样本(n=51)中,只有一个细菌分离物来自胎儿大脑样本,其细菌负荷高于污染对照,并且在至少一个母体样本的序列调查中被鉴定出来。因此,使用多种微生物学调查模式,没有一致的证据表明小鼠的胎盘和胎儿组织中存在细菌群落。产科领域的主流观点一直是无菌子宫假说,该假说认为胎儿在分娩过程中首先被微生物定植。然而,现在有些人认为,胎儿一直被来自栖息在胎盘和羊膜内环境中的微生物群落的微生物定植。鉴于微生物侵袭羊膜腔(即羊膜内感染)在妊娠并发症中的因果作用,特别是早产,如果定植假说成立,那么目前的几个方面将需要重新考虑;这些方面包括引起疾病所需的羊膜内微生物负荷的大小及其对免疫系统发育的潜在影响。然而,接受定植假说还为时过早。在这里,我们使用培养、qPCR 和 DNA 测序在小鼠中没有发现一致的胎盘和胎儿微生物群的证据。