Public Health Section,School of Health and Related Research-ScHARR, The University of Sheffield,Sheffield,UK.
Center for Food Science and Nutrition, Addis Ababa University,Addis Ababa,Ethiopia.
Proc Nutr Soc. 2019 Aug;78(3):388-397. doi: 10.1017/S0029665118002616. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
Multiple forms of malnutrition co-exist (the double burden) in low- and middle-income countries, but most interventions and policies target only one form. Identifying shared drivers of the double burden of malnutrition is a first step towards establishing effective interventions that simultaneously address the double burden of malnutrition (known as double-duty actions). We identified shared drivers for the double burden of malnutrition, to assess which double-duty actions are likely to have the greatest reach in preventing all forms of malnutrition, in the context of the sustainable development goals. We reviewed existing conceptual frameworks of the drivers of undernutrition, obesity and environmental sustainability. Shared drivers affecting all forms of malnutrition and environmental sustainability were captured using a socio-ecological approach. The extent to which drivers were addressed by the five double-duty actions proposed by the WHO was assessed. Overall, eighty-three shared drivers for the double burden of malnutrition were identified. A substantial proportion (75·0%) could be addressed by the five WHO double-duty actions. 'Regulations on marketing' and 'promotion of appropriate early and complementary feeding in infants' addressed the highest proportion of shared drivers (65·1% and 53·0%, respectively). Twenty-four drivers were likely to be sensitive to environmental sustainability, with 'regulations on marketing' and 'school food programmes and policies' likely to have the greatest environmental reach. A quarter of the shared drivers remained unaddressed by the five WHO double-duty actions. Substantially more drivers could be addressed with minor modifications to the WHO double-duty actions and the addition of de novo actions.
多种形式的营养不良(双重负担)在中低收入国家同时存在,但大多数干预措施和政策仅针对一种形式。确定营养不良双重负担的共同驱动因素是迈向制定有效干预措施的第一步,这些干预措施可以同时解决营养不良的双重负担(称为双重职责行动)。我们确定了营养不良双重负担的共同驱动因素,以评估在可持续发展目标背景下,哪些双重职责行动最有可能在预防所有形式的营养不良方面产生广泛影响。我们审查了现有的关于营养不良、肥胖和环境可持续性驱动因素的概念框架。使用社会生态方法捕捉影响所有形式的营养不良和环境可持续性的共同驱动因素。评估世卫组织提出的五项双重职责行动在多大程度上解决了这些驱动因素。总体而言,确定了 83 个营养不良双重负担的共同驱动因素。五项世卫组织双重职责行动可以解决相当大比例(75.0%)的驱动因素。“营销法规”和“促进婴儿适当的早期和补充喂养”解决了最大比例的共同驱动因素(分别为 65.1%和 53.0%)。有 24 个驱动因素可能对环境可持续性敏感,“营销法规”和“学校食品计划和政策”可能对环境产生最大影响。五项世卫组织双重职责行动仍未解决四分之一的共同驱动因素。只需对世卫组织双重职责行动进行微小修改,并增加新的行动,就可以解决更多的驱动因素。