• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Employee perspectives on genetic testing in the workplace: Results from a national survey.员工对职场基因检测的看法:一项全国性调查的结果。
Public Health Genomics. 2025 Aug 22:1-15. doi: 10.1159/000548116.
2
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act and workplace genetic testing: Knowledge and perceptions of employed adults in the United States.《遗传信息非歧视法案》与职场基因检测:美国在职成年人的知识与认知
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1945. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1945. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
3
Multidisciplinary stakeholder-informed identification of key characteristics for implementation of workplace genetic testing.多学科利益相关者参与的工作场所基因检测实施关键特征识别
HGG Adv. 2025 May 22;6(3):100458. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100458.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Workplace Genomic Testing: What Do Company Websites Say about Federal Privacy and Anti-Discrimination Laws?职场基因检测:公司网站对联邦隐私和反歧视法有何说法?
Public Health Genomics. 2025;28(1):190-195. doi: 10.1159/000546189. Epub 2025 May 3.
6
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
7
Workplace perk or pitfall? A qualitative study of genetic counselors' perspectives and experiences with workplace genetic testing.职场福利还是陷阱?一项关于遗传咨询师对职场基因检测的看法和经历的定性研究。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70016. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70016.
8
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
9
Multifaceted behavioral interventions to improve topical glaucoma therapy adherence in adults.多方面行为干预以提高成人局部青光眼治疗的依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 11;6(6):CD015788. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015788.pub2.
10
Aspects of Genetic Diversity, Host Specificity and Public Health Significance of Single-Celled Intestinal Parasites Commonly Observed in Humans and Mostly Referred to as 'Non-Pathogenic'.人类常见且大多被称为“非致病性”的单细胞肠道寄生虫的遗传多样性、宿主特异性及公共卫生意义
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70036. doi: 10.1111/apm.70036.

本文引用的文献

1
Workplace genetic testing: which employees are likely to participate, what are their concerns with employer sponsorship, and which design features could reduce barriers and increase participation?职场基因检测:哪些员工可能会参与,他们对雇主赞助有哪些担忧,以及哪些设计特点可以减少障碍并提高参与度?
Front Genet. 2024 Dec 4;15:1496900. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1496900. eCollection 2024.
2
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act and workplace genetic testing: Knowledge and perceptions of employed adults in the United States.《遗传信息非歧视法案》与职场基因检测:美国在职成年人的知识与认知
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1945. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1945. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
3
Racial Differences in Perceptions of Genetic Wellness Programs.种族差异对基因健康计划的看法。
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Sep;37(7):940-952. doi: 10.1177/08901171231184360. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
4
Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora's box?职场自愿性基因检测:健康福利还是潘多拉魔盒?
NPJ Genom Med. 2022 Jan 20;7(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41525-021-00276-8.
5
Increasing trust in health care.增进对医疗保健的信任。
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Dec;27(12):520-522. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88790.
6
The persistent lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) more than a decade after passage.超过十年来,人们对《遗传信息非歧视法案》(GINA)一直缺乏了解和误解。
Genet Med. 2021 Dec;23(12):2324-2334. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01268-w. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
7
Return on Investment of Workplace Wellness Programs for Chronic Disease Prevention: A Systematic Review.工作场所健康计划预防慢性病的投资回报:系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Aug;61(2):256-266. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 May 5.
8
Employees' Views and Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Assessment of Voluntary Workplace Genomic Testing.员工对工作场所自愿进行基因检测的看法以及伦理、法律和社会影响评估
Front Genet. 2021 Mar 17;12:643304. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.643304. eCollection 2021.
9
A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States.一项关于美国个体对隐私和遗传信息看法的系统性文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0204417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204417. eCollection 2018.
10
Stigma of Sickle Cell Disease: A Systematic Review.镰状细胞病的耻辱感:一项系统综述。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Aug;39(8):675-686. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2018.1443530. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

员工对职场基因检测的看法:一项全国性调查的结果。

Employee perspectives on genetic testing in the workplace: Results from a national survey.

作者信息

Roberts J Scott, Uhlmann Wendy R, Blasco Drew, Prince Anya E R, McCain Sarah, Pal Subhamoy, Sanghavi Kunal, Charnysh Elizabeth, Lee Charles

出版信息

Public Health Genomics. 2025 Aug 22:1-15. doi: 10.1159/000548116.

DOI:10.1159/000548116
PMID:40931502
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12431634/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Genetic testing for health-related purposes is now offered in some workplace wellness programs, with notable ethical, legal, and social implications. However, little is known about employee perspectives on workplace genetic testing (wGT).

METHODS

We surveyed a large, diverse national sample of 2,000 employed adults (mean age=43 years; 51% female). Survey measures assessed respondents' wGT beliefs, perceptions of employer motivations for offering wGT, and privacy concerns.

RESULTS

Most respondents (57.4%) agreed that wGT would improve employees' health, and 46.7% agreed it could aid recruitment and retention of employees. Many respondents attributed legally prohibited motivations to employers offering wGT, including charging employees higher insurance premiums based on wGT results (28.8% rated as very important to employers). Overall, 37% of respondents were not at all comfortable with their employer collecting their genetic information; in addition, most (83.6%) were somewhat or very concerned their employer would fail to protect the privacy of their genetic information or would share such information without permission (79.2%). Heightened privacy concerns were positively associated with employee characteristics including age > 55 years, self-identified Black or Asian race and ethnicity, and family history of common diseases, and inversely associated with prior genetic testing experience and employer trust.

CONCLUSIONS

Employees perceive potential health benefits of wGT but harbor substantial privacy concerns and show limited awareness of legal protections against employer misuse of wGT results. Findings suggest a need for robust employee education and informed consent in wGT, along with safeguarding of sensitive personal genetic information.

摘要

引言

目前,一些职场健康项目提供与健康相关的基因检测服务,这带来了显著的伦理、法律和社会影响。然而,对于员工对职场基因检测(wGT)的看法,我们知之甚少。

方法

我们对2000名在职成年人进行了一项大规模、多样化的全国性抽样调查(平均年龄 = 43岁;51%为女性)。调查措施评估了受访者对wGT的看法、对雇主提供wGT动机的认知以及隐私担忧。

结果

大多数受访者(57.4%)认为wGT会改善员工健康,46.7%的受访者认为它有助于招聘和留住员工。许多受访者将法律禁止的动机归因于提供wGT的雇主,包括根据wGT结果向员工收取更高的保险费(28.8%的受访者认为这对雇主非常重要)。总体而言,37%的受访者对雇主收集他们的基因信息一点也不舒服;此外,大多数人(83.6%)有点或非常担心雇主会未能保护他们基因信息的隐私,或者会未经许可分享此类信息(79.2%)。隐私担忧加剧与员工特征呈正相关,包括年龄 > 55岁、自我认定为黑人或亚洲种族以及有常见疾病家族史,与先前的基因检测经验和雇主信任呈负相关。

结论

员工认识到wGT可能带来的健康益处,但对隐私问题深感担忧,并且对防止雇主滥用wGT结果的法律保护意识有限。研究结果表明,需要对wGT进行有力的员工教育和知情同意,同时保护敏感的个人基因信息。