Suppr超能文献

员工对职场基因检测的看法:一项全国性调查的结果。

Employee perspectives on genetic testing in the workplace: Results from a national survey.

作者信息

Roberts J Scott, Uhlmann Wendy R, Blasco Drew, Prince Anya E R, McCain Sarah, Pal Subhamoy, Sanghavi Kunal, Charnysh Elizabeth, Lee Charles

出版信息

Public Health Genomics. 2025 Aug 22:1-15. doi: 10.1159/000548116.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Genetic testing for health-related purposes is now offered in some workplace wellness programs, with notable ethical, legal, and social implications. However, little is known about employee perspectives on workplace genetic testing (wGT).

METHODS

We surveyed a large, diverse national sample of 2,000 employed adults (mean age=43 years; 51% female). Survey measures assessed respondents' wGT beliefs, perceptions of employer motivations for offering wGT, and privacy concerns.

RESULTS

Most respondents (57.4%) agreed that wGT would improve employees' health, and 46.7% agreed it could aid recruitment and retention of employees. Many respondents attributed legally prohibited motivations to employers offering wGT, including charging employees higher insurance premiums based on wGT results (28.8% rated as very important to employers). Overall, 37% of respondents were not at all comfortable with their employer collecting their genetic information; in addition, most (83.6%) were somewhat or very concerned their employer would fail to protect the privacy of their genetic information or would share such information without permission (79.2%). Heightened privacy concerns were positively associated with employee characteristics including age > 55 years, self-identified Black or Asian race and ethnicity, and family history of common diseases, and inversely associated with prior genetic testing experience and employer trust.

CONCLUSIONS

Employees perceive potential health benefits of wGT but harbor substantial privacy concerns and show limited awareness of legal protections against employer misuse of wGT results. Findings suggest a need for robust employee education and informed consent in wGT, along with safeguarding of sensitive personal genetic information.

摘要

引言

目前,一些职场健康项目提供与健康相关的基因检测服务,这带来了显著的伦理、法律和社会影响。然而,对于员工对职场基因检测(wGT)的看法,我们知之甚少。

方法

我们对2000名在职成年人进行了一项大规模、多样化的全国性抽样调查(平均年龄 = 43岁;51%为女性)。调查措施评估了受访者对wGT的看法、对雇主提供wGT动机的认知以及隐私担忧。

结果

大多数受访者(57.4%)认为wGT会改善员工健康,46.7%的受访者认为它有助于招聘和留住员工。许多受访者将法律禁止的动机归因于提供wGT的雇主,包括根据wGT结果向员工收取更高的保险费(28.8%的受访者认为这对雇主非常重要)。总体而言,37%的受访者对雇主收集他们的基因信息一点也不舒服;此外,大多数人(83.6%)有点或非常担心雇主会未能保护他们基因信息的隐私,或者会未经许可分享此类信息(79.2%)。隐私担忧加剧与员工特征呈正相关,包括年龄 > 55岁、自我认定为黑人或亚洲种族以及有常见疾病家族史,与先前的基因检测经验和雇主信任呈负相关。

结论

员工认识到wGT可能带来的健康益处,但对隐私问题深感担忧,并且对防止雇主滥用wGT结果的法律保护意识有限。研究结果表明,需要对wGT进行有力的员工教育和知情同意,同时保护敏感的个人基因信息。

相似文献

1
Employee perspectives on genetic testing in the workplace: Results from a national survey.
Public Health Genomics. 2025 Aug 22:1-15. doi: 10.1159/000548116.
5
Workplace Genomic Testing: What Do Company Websites Say about Federal Privacy and Anti-Discrimination Laws?
Public Health Genomics. 2025;28(1):190-195. doi: 10.1159/000546189. Epub 2025 May 3.
9
Multifaceted behavioral interventions to improve topical glaucoma therapy adherence in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 11;6(6):CD015788. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015788.pub2.

本文引用的文献

3
Racial Differences in Perceptions of Genetic Wellness Programs.
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Sep;37(7):940-952. doi: 10.1177/08901171231184360. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
4
Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora's box?
NPJ Genom Med. 2022 Jan 20;7(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41525-021-00276-8.
5
Increasing trust in health care.
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Dec;27(12):520-522. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88790.
7
Return on Investment of Workplace Wellness Programs for Chronic Disease Prevention: A Systematic Review.
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Aug;61(2):256-266. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 May 5.
8
Employees' Views and Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Assessment of Voluntary Workplace Genomic Testing.
Front Genet. 2021 Mar 17;12:643304. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.643304. eCollection 2021.
9
A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States.
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0204417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204417. eCollection 2018.
10
Stigma of Sickle Cell Disease: A Systematic Review.
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Aug;39(8):675-686. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2018.1443530. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验