• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整合公众偏好以克服研究中的种族差异:一项关于增强对研究数据共享实践信任度的美国调查结果

Integrating public preferences to overcome racial disparities in research: findings from a US survey on enhancing trust in research data-sharing practices.

作者信息

Niño de Rivera Stephanie, Zhao Yihong, Omollo Shalom, Eslami Sarah, Benda Natalie, Sharma Yashika, Reading Turchioe Meghan, Sharko Marianne, Dugdale Lydia S, Masterson Creber Ruth

机构信息

Columbia University School of Nursing, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States.

Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10065, United States.

出版信息

JAMIA Open. 2025 May 2;8(3):ooaf031. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf031. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf031
PMID:40322632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12047078/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Data-sharing policies are rapidly evolving toward increased data sharing. However, participants' perspectives are not well understood and could have an adverse impact on participation in research. We evaluated participants' preferences for sharing specific types of data with specific groups, and strategies to enhance trust in data-sharing practices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In March 2023, we conducted a nationally representative online survey with 610 US adults and used logistic regression models to assess sociodemographic differences in their willingness to share different types of data.

RESULTS

Our findings highlight notable racial disparities in willingness to share research data with external entities, especially health policy and public health organizations. Black participants were significantly less likely to share most health data with public health organizations, including mental health (odds ratio [OR]: 0.543, 95% CI, 0.323-0.895) and sexual health/fertility information (OR: 0.404, 95% CI, 0.228-0.691), compared to White participants. Moreover, 63% of participants expressed that their trust in researchers would improve if given control over the data recipients.

DISCUSSION

Participants exhibit reluctance to share specific types of personal research data, emphasizing strong preferences regarding external data access. This highlights the need for a critical reassessment of current data-sharing policies to align with participant concerns.

CONCLUSION

It is imperative for data-sharing policies to integrate diverse patient viewpoints to mitigate risk of distrust and a potential unintended consequence of lower participation among racial and ethnic minority participants in research.

摘要

目的

数据共享政策正在迅速朝着增加数据共享的方向发展。然而,参与者的观点尚未得到充分理解,可能会对研究参与产生不利影响。我们评估了参与者对于与特定群体共享特定类型数据的偏好,以及增强对数据共享实践信任的策略。

材料与方法

2023年3月,我们对610名美国成年人进行了一项具有全国代表性的在线调查,并使用逻辑回归模型评估他们在共享不同类型数据意愿方面的社会人口统计学差异。

结果

我们的研究结果凸显了在与外部实体(尤其是卫生政策和公共卫生组织)共享研究数据意愿方面显著的种族差异。与白人参与者相比,黑人参与者向公共卫生组织共享大多数健康数据的可能性显著更低,包括心理健康数据(优势比[OR]:0.543,95%置信区间,0.323 - 0.895)和性健康/生育信息(OR:0.404,95%置信区间,0.228 - 0.691)。此外,63%的参与者表示,如果能对数据接收者进行控制,他们对研究人员的信任将会提高。

讨论

参与者表现出不愿共享特定类型的个人研究数据,强调了对外部数据访问的强烈偏好。这凸显了对当前数据共享政策进行批判性重新评估以符合参与者关切的必要性。

结论

数据共享政策必须整合不同患者的观点,以降低不信任风险以及种族和少数民族参与者在研究中参与度降低这一潜在意外后果的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d576/12047078/cafb9d87f67d/ooaf031f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d576/12047078/71c7d25e8976/ooaf031f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d576/12047078/27aa8789ac78/ooaf031f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d576/12047078/2574a5ed8f47/ooaf031f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d576/12047078/cafb9d87f67d/ooaf031f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d576/12047078/71c7d25e8976/ooaf031f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d576/12047078/27aa8789ac78/ooaf031f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d576/12047078/2574a5ed8f47/ooaf031f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d576/12047078/cafb9d87f67d/ooaf031f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Integrating public preferences to overcome racial disparities in research: findings from a US survey on enhancing trust in research data-sharing practices.整合公众偏好以克服研究中的种族差异:一项关于增强对研究数据共享实践信任度的美国调查结果
JAMIA Open. 2025 May 2;8(3):ooaf031. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf031. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Public perspectives on increased data sharing in health research in the context of the 2023 National Institutes of Health Data Sharing Policy.公众对 2023 年美国国立卫生研究院数据共享政策背景下增加健康研究数据共享的看法。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 28;19(8):e0309161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309161. eCollection 2024.
3
Sharing medical data for health research: the early personal health record experience.用于健康研究的医学数据共享:早期个人健康记录经验。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 May 25;12(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1356.
4
Privacy, Trust, and Data Sharing in Web-Based and Mobile Research: Participant Perspectives in a Large Nationwide Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States.基于网络和移动设备的研究中的隐私、信任与数据共享:美国全国范围内大量男男性行为者样本中的参与者观点
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 4;20(7):e233. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9019.
5
Understanding Public Attitudes and Willingness to Share Commercial Data for Health Research: Survey Study in the United Kingdom.理解公众对健康研究中商业数据共享的态度和意愿:英国的调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Mar 23;9:e40814. doi: 10.2196/40814.
6
Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.患者对使用数字系统进行动态同意和研究反馈来共享匿名个人健康数据的看法:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 15;18(4):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5011.
7
Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey.公众对数字健康研究知识库的态度:国际横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 29;23(10):e31294. doi: 10.2196/31294.
8
Heterogeneity in willingness to share personal health information: a nationwide cluster analysis of 20,000 adults in Japan.分享个人健康信息意愿的异质性:对日本20000名成年人的全国性聚类分析。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Apr 18;83(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01599-z.
9
Building trust in research through information and intent transparency with health information: representative cross-sectional survey of 502 US adults.通过健康信息的信息和意图透明度建立对研究的信任:对 502 名美国成年人的代表性横断面调查。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Aug 16;29(9):1535-1545. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac084.
10
Patients' and Publics' Preferences for Data-Intensive Health Research Governance: Survey Study.患者和公众对数据密集型健康研究治理的偏好:调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 7;9(3):e36797. doi: 10.2196/36797.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of communication transparency and organizational trust in publics' perceptions, attitudes and social distancing behaviour: A case study of the COVID-19 outbreak.沟通透明度和组织信任在公众认知、态度及社交距离行为中的作用:以新冠疫情为例的研究
J Conting Crisis Manag. 2021 Dec;29(4):368-384. doi: 10.1111/1468-5973.12354. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
2
Public perspectives on increased data sharing in health research in the context of the 2023 National Institutes of Health Data Sharing Policy.公众对 2023 年美国国立卫生研究院数据共享政策背景下增加健康研究数据共享的看法。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 28;19(8):e0309161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309161. eCollection 2024.
3
The end of Roe v. Wade: implications for Women's mental health and care.
罗诉韦德案的终结:对女性心理健康与护理的影响
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 5;14:1087045. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1087045. eCollection 2023.
4
Return of aggregate results to study participants: Facilitators, barriers, and recommendations.向研究参与者反馈总体结果:促进因素、障碍及建议。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Apr 14;33:101136. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101136. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Patient Perspectives and Preferences for Consent in the Digital Health Context: State-of-the-art Literature Review.患者在数字健康背景下对知情同意的观点和偏好:最新文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 10;25:e42507. doi: 10.2196/42507.
6
Returning study results to research participants: Data access, format, and sharing preferences.研究参与者的研究结果返还:数据访问、格式和共享偏好。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104955. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104955. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
7
A Review of the Evolving Landscape of Inclusive Research and Improved Clinical Trial Access.包容研究和改善临床试验可及性的发展态势综述
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Mar;113(3):518-527. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2832. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
8
The Mental and Physical Health Impacts of Overturning Roe v Wade.推翻罗诉韦德案对身心健康的影响
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2022 Dec 1;210(12):891-893. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001596.
9
Incorporating Dis/ability Studies and Critical Race Theory to combat systematic exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color in clinical neuroscience.融合残疾研究与批判种族理论,以对抗临床神经科学中对黑人、原住民和有色人种的系统性排斥。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Sep 8;16:988092. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.988092. eCollection 2022.
10
Repercussions of overturning Roe v. Wade for women across systems and beyond borders.罗诉韦德案被推翻对女性的跨系统和跨境影响。
Reprod Health. 2022 Aug 24;19(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01490-y.