• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Knowledge, motivations, expectations, and traits of an African, African-American, and Afro-Caribbean sequencing cohort and comparisons to the original ClinSeq cohort.非洲人、非裔美国人和非裔加勒比测序队列的知识、动机、期望和特征,以及与原始 ClinSeq 队列的比较。
Genet Med. 2019 Jun;21(6):1355-1362. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0341-9. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
2
How acceptable is it for HIV positive African, Caribbean and Black women to provide breast milk/fluid samples for research purposes?对于感染艾滋病毒的非洲、加勒比和黑人女性来说,提供母乳/体液样本用于研究目的的可接受程度如何?
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jan 3;10(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2326-6.
3
Characterizing Participants in the ClinSeq Genome Sequencing Cohort as Early Adopters of a New Health Technology.将ClinSeq基因组测序队列中的参与者表征为一种新健康技术的早期采用者。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 17;10(7):e0132690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132690. eCollection 2015.
4
Knowledge, group-based medical mistrust, future expectations, and perceived disadvantages of medical genetic testing: perspectives of Black African immigrants/refugees.知识、基于群体的医疗不信任、未来期望以及医学基因检测的感知劣势:非洲黑人移民/难民的观点
Public Health Genomics. 2014;17(1):33-42. doi: 10.1159/000356013. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
5
Voluntary participation and informed consent to international genetic research.国际基因研究中的自愿参与和知情同意
Am J Public Health. 2006 Nov;96(11):1989-95. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.076232. Epub 2006 Oct 3.
6
HIV-related stigma among African, Caribbean, and Black youth in Windsor, Ontario.安大略省温莎市非洲、加勒比和黑人青年中与艾滋病病毒相关的耻辱感。
AIDS Care. 2016;28(6):758-63. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1158397. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
7
Genetic Testing and Other Healthcare Use by Black and White Individuals in a Genomic Sequencing Study.在一项基因组测序研究中,黑人和白人个体的基因检测和其他医疗保健使用情况。
Public Health Genomics. 2023;26(1):90-102. doi: 10.1159/000533356. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
8
Ethical and legal implications of whole genome and whole exome sequencing in African populations.全基因组和全外显子组测序在非裔人群中的伦理和法律影响。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 May 28;14:21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-21.
9
Engagement and return of results preferences among a primarily African American genomic sequencing research cohort.主要由非裔美国人组成的基因组测序研究队列中对参与和结果回报的偏好。
Am J Hum Genet. 2021 May 6;108(5):894-902. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
10
Effects of informed consent for individual genome sequencing on relevant knowledge.个体基因组测序知情同意对相关知识的影响。
Clin Genet. 2012 Nov;82(5):408-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01909.x. Epub 2012 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Determinants of Genetics Referral and Completion Rates Among Pediatric Neurology Patients.儿科神经科患者基因转诊及完成率的社会决定因素
Pediatr Neurol. 2025 Apr;165:78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2025.01.018. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
2
Publics' knowledge of, attitude to and motivation towards health-related genomics: a scoping review.公众对健康相关基因组学的知识、态度和动机:范围综述。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jul;32(7):747-758. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01547-5. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
3
Derived myeloid lineage induced pluripotent stem as a platform to study human C-C chemokine receptor type 5Δ32 homozygotes.衍生髓系谱系诱导多能干细胞作为研究人类C-C趋化因子受体5型Δ32纯合子的平台。
iScience. 2023 Oct 28;26(11):108331. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108331. eCollection 2023 Nov 17.
4
Return of Results in Genomic Research Using Large-Scale or Whole Genome Sequencing: Toward a New Normal.使用大规模或全基因组测序进行基因组研究的结果回报:迈向新常态。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2023 Aug 25;24:393-414. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-101122-103209. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
5
Attitudes and beliefs regarding race-targeted genetic testing of Black people: A systematic review.关于针对黑人的种族靶向基因检测的态度和信念:系统评价。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Apr;32(2):435-461. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1653. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
6
Assessing patient-level knowledge of precision medicine in a community health center setting.在社区卫生中心环境中评估患者层面的精准医学知识。
J Community Genet. 2023 Apr;14(2):197-210. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00632-4. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
7
Future-oriented Emotions and Decisions to Receive Genomic Testing Results Among U.S. Adults of African Ancestry.美国非洲裔成年人的未来导向情绪与接受基因组检测结果的决策。
Ann Behav Med. 2023 Apr 22;57(5):418-423. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaac069.
8
Perspectives of diverse Spanish- and English-speaking patients on the clinical use of polygenic risk scores.西班牙语和英语患者对多基因风险评分临床应用的看法。
Genet Med. 2022 Jun;24(6):1217-1226. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
9
Motivations and concerns of patients considering participation in an implementation study of a hereditary cancer risk assessment program in diverse primary care settings.考虑参与在不同初级保健环境中实施遗传性癌症风险评估计划的患者的动机和关注点。
Genet Med. 2022 Mar;24(3):610-621. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.017. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
10
The ACMG SF v3.0 gene list increases returnable variant detection by 22% when compared with v2.0 in the ClinSeq cohort.与 ACMG SF v2.0 相比,ClinSeq 队列中 ACMG SF v3.0 基因列表使可检出变异的比例提高了 22%。
Genet Med. 2022 Mar;24(3):736-743. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.012. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient understanding of, satisfaction with, and perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing: findings from the MedSeq Project.患者对全基因组测序的理解、满意度和感知效用:MedSeq 项目的研究结果。
Genet Med. 2018 Sep;20(9):1069-1076. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.223. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
2
The NextGen Study: patient motivation for participation in genome sequencing for carrier status.下一代研究:患者参与携带者状态基因测序的动机
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2017 Jul 2;5(5):508-515. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.306. eCollection 2017 Sep.
3
Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review.医疗保健专业人员中的隐性偏见:一项系统综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 1;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8.
4
Sickle Cell Disease - A History of Progress and Peril.镰状细胞病——进步与危机的历史
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 2;376(9):805-807. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1700101.
5
Genomics is failing on diversity.基因组学在多样性方面表现不佳。
Nature. 2016 Oct 13;538(7624):161-164. doi: 10.1038/538161a.
6
Conducting Precision Medicine Research with African Americans.开展针对非裔美国人的精准医学研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0154850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154850. eCollection 2016.
7
Oncologists' and cancer patients' views on whole-exome sequencing and incidental findings: results from the CanSeq study.肿瘤学家和癌症患者对全外显子组测序及偶然发现的看法:CanSeq研究结果
Genet Med. 2016 Oct;18(10):1011-9. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.207. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
8
"Watching time tick by…": Decision making for Duchenne muscular dystrophy trials.“看着时间流逝……”:杜氏肌营养不良症试验的决策制定
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Jan;46:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
9
A global reference for human genetic variation.人类遗传变异的全球参考。
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):68-74. doi: 10.1038/nature15393.
10
Genetic Knowledge Among Participants in the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative.科里尔个性化医疗协作项目参与者的遗传知识
J Genet Couns. 2016 Apr;25(2):385-94. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9883-z. Epub 2015 Aug 27.

非洲人、非裔美国人和非裔加勒比测序队列的知识、动机、期望和特征,以及与原始 ClinSeq 队列的比较。

Knowledge, motivations, expectations, and traits of an African, African-American, and Afro-Caribbean sequencing cohort and comparisons to the original ClinSeq cohort.

机构信息

National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, Portland, ME, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2019 Jun;21(6):1355-1362. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0341-9. Epub 2018 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1038/s41436-018-0341-9
PMID:30382154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7721818/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Racial minority populations are underrepresented in genomics research. This study enrolled African-descended individuals in a sequencing study and reported their characteristics.

METHODS

We purposively recruited 467 individuals self-identified as African, African American, or Afro-Caribbean to the ClinSeq study and surveyed them about knowledge, motivations, expectations, and traits. Summary statistics were calculated and compared with data from the study's original cohort, which was primarily White and self-referred.

RESULTS

Recruitment took five years and 83% of enrollees completed the survey. Participants had modest knowledge about benefits and limitations of sequencing (x̅s = 5.1, ranges: 0-10), and less than the original cohort (x̅ = 7.5 and 7.7, respectively). Common motivations to enroll were learning information relevant to personal health (49%) or family members' health (33%), and most had realistic expectations of sequencing. Like the original cohort, they had high levels of optimism, openness, and resilience.

CONCLUSION

Early adopters may have relatively consistent personality traits irrespective of majority/minority status and recruitment methods, but high levels of genomics knowledge are not universal. Research should determine whether recruitment and consent procedures provide adequate education to promote informed choices and realistic expectations, which are vital to ethical research and increasing genomics research participation in underrepresented communities.

摘要

目的

少数族裔在基因组学研究中的代表性不足。本研究招募了非洲裔个体参与测序研究,并报告了他们的特征。

方法

我们有目的地招募了 467 名自认为是非洲人、非裔美国人或非裔加勒比人的个体参加 ClinSeq 研究,并对他们的知识、动机、期望和特征进行了调查。计算了汇总统计数据,并与该研究最初的主要为白人且自我推荐的队列数据进行了比较。

结果

招募工作耗时五年,83%的参与者完成了调查。参与者对测序的益处和局限性只有中等程度的了解(平均值为 5.1,范围为 0-10),低于原始队列(平均值分别为 7.5 和 7.7)。参与的常见动机是了解与个人健康(49%)或家庭成员健康(33%)相关的信息,并且大多数人对测序有现实的期望。与原始队列一样,他们具有高度的乐观、开放和适应力。

结论

早期采用者可能具有相对一致的个性特征,无论其多数/少数族裔地位和招募方法如何,但高水平的基因组学知识并非普遍存在。研究应确定招募和同意程序是否提供了足够的教育,以促进知情选择和现实期望,这对于伦理研究和增加代表性不足社区的基因组学研究参与至关重要。