• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Motivations and concerns of patients considering participation in an implementation study of a hereditary cancer risk assessment program in diverse primary care settings.考虑参与在不同初级保健环境中实施遗传性癌症风险评估计划的患者的动机和关注点。
Genet Med. 2022 Mar;24(3):610-621. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.017. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
2
Critical decisions: A mixed-methods study of decision-making among diverse gynecologic cancer patients considering therapeutic clinical trial enrollment.关键决策:一项混合方法研究,探讨不同妇科癌症患者在考虑参加治疗性临床试验时的决策过程。
Gynecol Oncol. 2024 May;184:103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.031. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Motivations, enrollment decisions, and socio-demographic characteristics of healthy volunteers in phase 1 research.1 期研究中健康志愿者的入组动机、入组决策和社会人口学特征。
Clin Trials. 2017 Oct;14(5):526-536. doi: 10.1177/1740774517722130. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Motivations and concerns of patients with access to genetic testing for hereditary pancreatitis.可进行遗传性胰腺炎基因检测的患者的动机和担忧
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 May;96(5):1610-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03787.x.
6
Motivations and Decision Making Processes of Men With X-linked Retinoschisis Considering Participation in an Ocular Gene Therapy Trial.X 连锁性视网膜劈裂症男性参与眼部基因治疗试验的动机和决策过程。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug;204:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
7
Motivations for and against Participation in Neonatal Research: Insights from Interviews of Diverse Parents Approached for Neonatal Research in the United States.参与新生儿研究的动机和顾虑:对美国被邀请参与新生儿研究的不同父母的访谈洞察。
J Pediatr. 2024 Dec;275:113923. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.113923. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
8
[Factors Influencing Patient Decisions Regarding Cancer Clinical Trial Participation: A Systematic Review].[影响患者参与癌症临床试验决策的因素:一项系统评价]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2022 Feb;69(1):83-99. doi: 10.6224/JN.202202_69(1).11.
9
Extended Family Outreach in Hereditary Cancer Using Web-Based Genealogy, Direct-to-Consumer Ancestry Genetics, and Social Media: Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of the ConnectMyVariant Intervention.利用基于网络的家谱、直接面向消费者的祖先遗传学和社交媒体进行遗传性癌症的大家庭外展:ConnectMyVariant干预措施的混合方法过程评估
JMIR Cancer. 2023 Apr 20;9:e43126. doi: 10.2196/43126.
10
Motivations of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension to participate in randomized clinical trials.肺动脉高压患者参与随机临床试验的动机。
Clin Trials. 2012 Jun;9(3):348-57. doi: 10.1177/1740774512438981. Epub 2012 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Art and Science of Genetic Counseling in Nephrology.肾脏病学中遗传咨询的艺术与科学
Kidney360. 2025 Apr 23;6(7):1230-1244. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000825.
2
An Ethical Approach to Genomic Privacy Preserving Technology Development.一种关于基因组隐私保护技术开发的伦理方法。
Proc (IEEE Int Conf Healthc Inform). 2024 Jun;2024:638-641. doi: 10.1109/ichi61247.2024.00102. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
3
Facilitators and Barriers to Uptake of Genetic and Cascade Testing in Familial Hypercholesterolemia: a Systematic Review.家族性高胆固醇血症中基因检测及级联检测应用的促进因素与障碍:一项系统综述
Int J Behav Med. 2025 Apr 8. doi: 10.1007/s12529-025-10357-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining access to care in clinical genomic research and medicine: Experiences from the CSER Consortium.审视临床基因组研究与医学中的医疗服务可及性:CSER联盟的经验
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep 14;5(1):e193. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.855. eCollection 2021.
2
Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM): A clinical trial assessing a multimodal cancer genetics services delivery program and its impact on diverse populations.癌症健康评估惠及众人(CHARM):一项评估多种癌症遗传学服务提供模式及其对不同人群影响的临床试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jul;106:106432. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106432. Epub 2021 May 11.
3
DNA-based screening and population health: a points to consider statement for programs and sponsoring organizations from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).基于DNA的筛查与群体健康:美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)为项目及赞助组织提供的一份需考虑要点声明
Genet Med. 2021 Jun;23(6):989-995. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-01082-w. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
4
Participant Reactions to a Literacy-Focused, Web-Based Informed Consent Approach for a Genomic Implementation Study.参与者对基于网络的以读写能力为重点的基因组实施研究知情同意方法的反应。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1823907. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
5
The influence of patient-provider communication on cancer screenings differs among racial and ethnic groups.患者与医疗服务提供者之间的沟通对癌症筛查的影响在不同种族和族裔群体中存在差异。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Apr 2;18:101086. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101086. eCollection 2020 Jun.
6
Identifying Barriers and Facilitators to Breast Cancer Early Detection and Subsequent Treatment Engagement in Kenya: A Qualitative Approach.肯尼亚乳腺癌早期检测及后续治疗参与障碍与促进因素识别:定性研究方法
Oncologist. 2019 Dec;24(12):1549-1556. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0257. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
7
Barriers of colorectal cancer screening in rural USA: a systematic review.美国农村地区结直肠癌筛查的障碍:一项系统综述
Rural Remote Health. 2019 Aug;19(3):5181. doi: 10.22605/RRH5181. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
8
Motivations for Participation in Parkinson Disease Genetic Research Among Hispanics versus Non-Hispanics.西班牙裔与非西班牙裔参与帕金森病基因研究的动机
Front Genet. 2019 Jul 16;10:658. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00658. eCollection 2019.
9
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
10
When Is It Ethical for Physician-Investigators to Seek Consent From Their Own Patients?医生-研究者何时从自己的患者那里寻求同意是合乎道德的?
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Apr;19(4):11-18. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1572811.

考虑参与在不同初级保健环境中实施遗传性癌症风险评估计划的患者的动机和关注点。

Motivations and concerns of patients considering participation in an implementation study of a hereditary cancer risk assessment program in diverse primary care settings.

机构信息

Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA.

Palliative Care and Resilience Research Program, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2022 Mar;24(3):610-621. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.017. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.017
PMID:34906471
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8939763/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Understanding the motivations and concerns of patients from diverse populations regarding participation in implementation research provides the needed evidence about how to design and conduct studies for facilitating access to genetics services. Within a hereditary cancer screening study assessing a multifaceted intervention, we examined primary care patients' motivations and concerns about participation.

METHODS

We surveyed and interviewed study participants after they enrolled, surveyed those who did not complete enrollment, and used descriptive qualitative and quantitative methods to identify motivations and concerns regarding participation.

RESULTS

Survey respondents' most common motivations included a desire to learn about their future risk (81%), receiving information that may help family (58%), and a desire to advance research (34%). Interviews revealed 3 additional important factors: affordability of testing, convenience of participation, and clinical relationships supporting research decision-making. Survey data of those who declined enrollment showed that the reasons for declining included concerns about privacy (38%), burdens of the research (19%), and their fear of not being able to cope with the genetic information (19%).

CONCLUSION

Understanding the facilitating factors and concerns that contribute to decisions about research may reveal ways to improve equity in access to care and research that could lead to greater uptake of genomic medicine across diverse primary care patient populations.

摘要

目的

了解来自不同人群的患者参与实施研究的动机和关注点,为如何设计和开展研究以促进获得遗传服务提供必要的证据。在一项评估多方面干预措施的遗传性癌症筛查研究中,我们调查了初级保健患者参与研究的动机和关注点。

方法

我们在研究参与者入组后进行了调查和访谈,对未完成入组的参与者进行了调查,并使用描述性定性和定量方法来确定参与研究的动机和关注点。

结果

调查参与者最常见的动机包括了解未来风险的愿望(81%)、获得可能有助于家庭的信息(58%)和推进研究的愿望(34%)。访谈揭示了另外 3 个重要因素:检测的可负担性、参与的便利性以及支持研究决策的临床关系。未入组参与者的调查数据显示,拒绝入组的原因包括对隐私的担忧(38%)、对研究负担的担忧(19%)以及对无法应对遗传信息的恐惧(19%)。

结论

了解促进决策的因素和关注点可能揭示改善获得护理和研究机会公平性的方法,从而导致更多不同的初级保健患者群体接受基因组医学。