• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项基因组测序研究中,黑人和白人个体的基因检测和其他医疗保健使用情况。

Genetic Testing and Other Healthcare Use by Black and White Individuals in a Genomic Sequencing Study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Genomics. 2023;26(1):90-102. doi: 10.1159/000533356. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1159/000533356
PMID:37544304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10614486/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Early adopters play a critical role in the diffusion of medical innovations by spreading awareness, increasing acceptability, and driving demand. Understanding the role of race in the context of other characteristics of potential early adopters can shed light on disparities seen in the early implementation of genomic medicine. We aimed to understand the association between self-identified race and individual experience with genetic testing outside of the research context.

METHODS

We assessed factors associated with the odds of having ever received genetic testing prior to enrollment in a genomic sequencing study among 674 self-identified white and 407 self-identified African, African American, or Afro-Caribbean ("Black") individuals.

RESULTS

Controlling for individual determinants of healthcare use (demographics, personality traits, knowledge and attitudes, and health status), identifying as Black was associated with lower odds of prior genetic testing (OR = 0.43, 95% CI [0.27-0.68], p < 0.001). In contrast, self-identified race was not associated with the use of non-genetic clinical screening tests (e.g., echocardiogram, colonoscopy). Black and white individuals were similar on self-reported personality traits tied to early adoption but differed by sociodemographic and resource facilitators of early adoption.

CONCLUSION

Persistent racial disparities among early adopters may represent especially-entrenched disparities in access to and knowledge of genomic technologies in clinical settings.

摘要

简介

早期采用者在医疗创新的传播中起着至关重要的作用,他们可以提高意识、增加可接受性并推动需求。了解种族在其他潜在早期采用者特征背景下的作用,可以揭示在基因组医学早期实施方面存在的差异。我们旨在了解在参与基因组测序研究之前,自我认同的种族与个体在研究背景之外进行基因检测的经历之间的关联。

方法

我们评估了在 674 名自我认定为白人的个体和 407 名自我认定为非裔、非裔美国人或 Afro-Caribbean(“黑人”)的个体中,与参加基因组测序研究之前接受过基因检测的几率相关的因素。

结果

在控制个体医疗保健使用的决定因素(人口统计学、人格特质、知识和态度以及健康状况)后,自我认同为黑人与接受基因检测的几率较低相关(OR=0.43,95%CI[0.27-0.68],p < 0.001)。相比之下,自我认定的种族与非基因临床筛查测试(例如,超声心动图、结肠镜检查)的使用无关。在与早期采用相关的自我报告人格特质方面,黑人个体和白人个体相似,但在早期采用的社会人口统计学和资源促进因素方面存在差异。

结论

早期采用者中持续存在的种族差异可能反映了在临床环境中获得和了解基因组技术方面存在的特别根深蒂固的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07a6/10614486/eddbf45820b3/phg-2023-0026-0001-533356_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07a6/10614486/5800285f5306/phg-2023-0026-0001-533356_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07a6/10614486/eddbf45820b3/phg-2023-0026-0001-533356_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07a6/10614486/5800285f5306/phg-2023-0026-0001-533356_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07a6/10614486/eddbf45820b3/phg-2023-0026-0001-533356_F02.jpg

相似文献

1
Genetic Testing and Other Healthcare Use by Black and White Individuals in a Genomic Sequencing Study.在一项基因组测序研究中,黑人和白人个体的基因检测和其他医疗保健使用情况。
Public Health Genomics. 2023;26(1):90-102. doi: 10.1159/000533356. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
2
The role of race and ethnicity in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in four states: are there baseline disparities, and what do they mean for SCHIP?种族和族裔在四个州的儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)中的作用:是否存在基线差异,以及这些差异对儿童健康保险计划意味着什么?
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e521.
3
Racial-ethnic disparities in stroke care: the American experience: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.种族和民族差异在卒中护理中的表现:美国经验:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会向医疗保健专业人员的声明。
Stroke. 2011 Jul;42(7):2091-116. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182213e24. Epub 2011 May 26.
4
Knowledge, motivations, expectations, and traits of an African, African-American, and Afro-Caribbean sequencing cohort and comparisons to the original ClinSeq cohort.非洲人、非裔美国人和非裔加勒比测序队列的知识、动机、期望和特征,以及与原始 ClinSeq 队列的比较。
Genet Med. 2019 Jun;21(6):1355-1362. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0341-9. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
5
Toward representative genomic research: the children's rare disease cohorts experience.迈向具有代表性的基因组研究:儿童罕见病队列研究经验
Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2023 Aug 22;4:26330040231181406. doi: 10.1177/26330040231181406. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
6
Disparities in the utilization of genetic testing for non-acquired infantile epileptic spasms syndrome in a single healthcare center in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州一家医疗中心非获得性婴儿痉挛综合征基因检测利用情况的差异
Epilepsia Open. 2025 Apr;10(2):477-486. doi: 10.1002/epi4.13140. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
7
Attitudes and beliefs regarding race-targeted genetic testing of Black people: A systematic review.关于针对黑人的种族靶向基因检测的态度和信念:系统评价。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Apr;32(2):435-461. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1653. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
8
Attitudes Toward Genomic Testing and Prostate Cancer Research Among Black Men.黑人男性对基因检测和前列腺癌研究的态度。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5 Suppl 1):S103-S111. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.028.
9
Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer.有乳腺癌或卵巢癌家族史的女性在BRCA1/2检测使用方面的种族差异。
JAMA. 2005 Apr 13;293(14):1729-36. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.14.1729.
10
Racial and ethnic disparities in genomic testing among lung cancer patients: a systematic review.肺癌患者基因组检测中的种族和民族差异:系统评价。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Jun 7;116(6):812-828. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae026.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision public health in the era of genomics and big data.基因组学和大数据时代的精准公共卫生
Nat Med. 2024 Jul;30(7):1865-1873. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03098-0. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
2
Rates and Classification of Variants of Uncertain Significance in Hereditary Disease Genetic Testing.遗传性疾病基因检测中不确定意义变异的发生率和分类。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2339571. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39571.