Division of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Cheeloo College of Medicine of Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Dec;14(12):1822-1831. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.08.027. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are the most commonly performed bariatric procedures globally. However, it remains controversial which procedure provides better glycemic control. To identify predictors of glycemic control after SG versus RYGB, a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted up to January 2017 for comparative studies with both SG and RYGB arms for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). A meta-analysis and systematic review was performed to evaluate glycemic control after SG versus RYGB with both short- and long-term follow-up. A meta-regression was performed to evaluate impacts of clinical indicators on glycemic control after SG versus RYGB. A total of 17 comparative studies involving 1160 patients were included. SG and RYGB achieved similar diabetic remission rates with both short- and long-term follow-up. However, SG provided lower endpoint glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) after 1-year follow-up (mean deviation = .17, 95% confidence interval .03-.31, P = .02). When adjusted by baseline A1C, SG and RYGB provided similar percent delta A1C with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up. The baseline body mass index, duration of T2D, preoperative fasting plasma glucose, and preoperative A1C had predictive value for glycemic control after SG, but only duration of T2D and preoperative A1C were correlated with that after RYGB. These findings showed that the choice of procedure between SG and RYGB predicts no better glycemic control. However, more factors should be considered when SG is recommended to a given patient with diabetes.
袖状胃切除术(SG)和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)是全球最常施行的减重手术。然而,哪种手术能更好地控制血糖仍然存在争议。为了明确 SG 与 RYGB 术后血糖控制的预测因素,我们系统检索了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆,检索时限截至 2017 年 1 月,以获取比较 SG 和 RYGB 治疗 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的双臂研究。我们进行了荟萃分析和系统综述,以评估 SG 与 RYGB 在短期和长期随访后的血糖控制情况。我们还进行了一项荟萃回归分析,以评估临床指标对 SG 与 RYGB 术后血糖控制的影响。共有 17 项比较研究纳入了 1160 例患者。SG 和 RYGB 在短期和长期随访后均具有相似的糖尿病缓解率。然而,SG 在 1 年随访后糖化血红蛋白(A1C)终点值较低(平均差异=0.17,95%置信区间 0.03-0.31,P=0.02)。在调整基线 A1C 后,SG 和 RYGB 在 1、2、3 和 5 年随访时的 A1C 百分比变化差异相似。基线体重指数、T2D 病程、术前空腹血糖和术前 A1C 对 SG 术后血糖控制有预测价值,但只有 T2D 病程和术前 A1C 与 RYGB 术后血糖控制相关。这些发现表明,SG 与 RYGB 之间的手术选择并不能更好地预测血糖控制。然而,当推荐 SG 给特定的糖尿病患者时,应考虑更多的因素。