Suppr超能文献

肥胖老年患者 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术的安全性和有效性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Obese Elder Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

The Center of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong university / The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, NO.82 Qinglong Road, Chengdu, 610031, Sichuan Province, China.

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong university / The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, NO.82 Qinglong Road, Chengdu, 610031, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2020 Sep;30(9):3408-3416. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04577-2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in patients aged 60 years old or older.

METHODS

The available literature was searched for eligible studies up to November 2019. The meta-analysis was performed by the RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis involved nineteen studies. The rates of early and late complications in RYGB were much higher than those in SG. More specifically, within 30 days after surgeries, leak, urinary tract infection, obstruction, and death occurred more often in the RYGB group. The above differences may lead to higher rates of hospital readmission and return to the operating room. RYGB was superior to SG in terms of remission of hypertension and the 1-year follow-up weight loss outcome, while there were no differences in terms of remission of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) as well as weight loss outcomes during 2- and 3-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

SG was the preferable option to RYGB for patients aged 60 years old or older, as SG has been shown not inferior to RYGB in terms of effectiveness, while being safer than RYGB.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较 60 岁及以上患者行 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)和袖状胃切除术(SG)的安全性和有效性。

方法

检索截至 2019 年 11 月的相关文献,采用 RevMan 5.3 软件进行荟萃分析。

结果

本荟萃分析共纳入 19 项研究。RYGB 的早期和晚期并发症发生率明显高于 SG。更具体地说,手术后 30 天内,RYGB 组更易发生漏、尿路感染、梗阻和死亡。这些差异可能导致更高的住院再入院率和重返手术室率。RYGB 在高血压缓解和 1 年随访减重效果方面优于 SG,而在 2 年和 3 年随访的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)缓解以及减重效果方面无差异。

结论

对于 60 岁及以上的患者,SG 是比 RYGB 更好的选择,因为 SG 在有效性方面不逊于 RYGB,且安全性优于 RYGB。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验