Oza Sandra K, van Schaik Sandrijn, Boscardin Christy K, Pierce Read, Miao Edna, Lockspeiser Tai, Tad-Y Darlene, Aagaard Eva, Kuo Anda K
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Oct;10(5):573-582. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00113.1.
While leadership training is increasingly incorporated into residency education, existing assessment tools to provide feedback on leadership skills are only applicable in limited contexts.
We developed an instrument, the Leadership Observation and Feedback Tool (LOFT), for assessing clinical leadership.
We used an iterative process to develop the tool, beginning with adapting the Leadership Practices Inventory to create an open-ended survey for identification of clinical leadership behaviors. We presented these to leadership experts who defined essential behaviors through a modified Delphi approach. In May 2014 we tested the resulting 29-item tool among residents in the internal medicine and pediatrics departments at 2 academic medical centers. We analyzed instrument performance using Cronbach's alpha, interrater reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and item performance using linear-by-linear test comparisons of responses by postgraduate year, site, and specialty.
A total of 377 (of 526, 72%) team members completed the LOFT for 95 (of 519, 18%) residents. Overall ratings were high-only 14% scored at the novice level. Cronbach's alpha was 0.79, and the ICC ranged from 0.20 to 0.79. Linear-by-linear test comparisons revealed significant differences between postgraduate year groups for some items, but no significant differences by site or specialty. Acceptability and usefulness ratings by respondents were high.
Despite a rigorous approach to instrument design, we were unable to collect convincing validity evidence for our instrument. The tool may still have some usefulness for providing formative feedback to residents on their clinical leadership skills.
虽然领导力培训越来越多地纳入住院医师教育,但现有的用于提供领导力技能反馈的评估工具仅适用于有限的情境。
我们开发了一种工具,即领导力观察与反馈工具(LOFT),用于评估临床领导力。
我们采用迭代过程来开发该工具,首先改编领导力实践清单以创建一份开放式调查问卷,用于识别临床领导行为。我们将这些内容呈现给领导力专家,他们通过改良的德尔菲法确定了关键行为。2014年5月,我们在2个学术医疗中心的内科和儿科住院医师中测试了最终得到的包含29个条目的工具。我们使用克朗巴哈系数分析工具性能,使用组内相关系数(ICC)分析评分者间信度,使用线性-by-线性检验比较研究生年级、地点和专业的回答来分析条目性能。
共有377名(共526名,72%)团队成员为95名(共519名,18%)住院医师完成了LOFT。总体评分较高,只有14%的人处于新手水平。克朗巴哈系数为0.79,ICC范围为0.20至0.79。线性-by-线性检验比较显示,某些条目在研究生年级组之间存在显著差异,但在地点或专业方面没有显著差异。受访者对该工具的可接受性和有用性评分较高。
尽管在工具设计上采取了严谨的方法,但我们未能为我们的工具收集到令人信服的效度证据。该工具可能仍对向住院医师提供有关其临床领导力技能的形成性反馈有一定用处。