Kridin Khalaf, Bergman Reuven
Department of Dermatology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Oct 17;5:266. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00266. eCollection 2018.
The specificity and the predictive values of indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) in real-life settings is yet to be firmly established. The natural history of patients with false-positive results has not been sufficiently elucidated. The primary aim of the current study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of IIF analysis on monkey esophagus in pemphigus, utilizing a large cohort arising from the real-life experience of a tertiary referral center. The secondary endpoint was to determine the clinical outcomes of patients with false-positive results. This was a retrospective cohort study including all patients who were tested for the presence of intercellular autoantibodies by IIF on monkey esophagus between 2000 and 2017. Overall, 770 sera from different individuals were tested by IIF microscopy. Of those, 176 patients had been diagnosed with pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and 29 patients with pemphigus foliaceus (PF). The sensitivity of this immunoassay was significantly higher for the diagnosis of PV (87.4%; 95% CI, 81.5-91.9%) as compared to PF (69.0%; 95% CI, 49.2-84.7%; = 0.018). The specificity for the diagnosis of pemphigus was 93.5% (95% CI, 91.1-95.4%). Patients with false-positive results ( = 37) were followed for a median duration of 5.3 years contributing 280.8 person-years. Thirty patients (81.1%) were eventually diagnosed clinically and immunopathologically with subepidermal autoimmune bullous diseases, whereas the remaining patients (18.9%) were diagnosed clinically and histologically with other inflammatory dermatoses, but none of them developed pemphigus during the follow-up duration. Of note, 7.0% ( = 23) of all patients diagnosed with bullous pemphigoid (BP) in the same period ( = 328) were tested positive for IgG intercellular antibodies. Histopathological review of the biopsy specimens of these patients did not reveal acantholysis. In conclusion, the predictive value of negative test in IIF on monkey esophagus is particularly reliable to exclude a diagnosis of pemphigus. Individuals tested positive for intercellular antibodies without an initial overt pemphigus did not show an increased risk for developing pemphigus subsequently. A sizable fraction of patients with BP showed circulating intercellular autoantibodies by IIF, without a histopathological evidence for acantholysis.
间接免疫荧光法(IIF)在实际应用中的特异性和预测价值尚未得到确切证实。假阳性结果患者的自然病史尚未得到充分阐明。本研究的主要目的是利用来自三级转诊中心实际经验的大量队列,评估IIF分析猴食管在天疱疮诊断中的价值。次要终点是确定假阳性结果患者的临床结局。这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2000年至2017年间所有通过IIF检测猴食管细胞间自身抗体的患者。总体而言,通过IIF显微镜检测了来自不同个体的770份血清。其中,176例患者被诊断为寻常型天疱疮(PV),29例患者被诊断为落叶型天疱疮(PF)。与PF(69.0%;95%可信区间,49.2 - 84.7%;P = 0.018)相比,该免疫测定对PV诊断的敏感性显著更高(87.4%;95%可信区间,81.5 - 91.9%)。天疱疮诊断的特异性为93.5%(95%可信区间,91.1 - 95.4%)。对假阳性结果患者(n = 37)进行了中位时长为5.3年的随访,累计280.8人年。30例患者(81.1%)最终经临床和免疫病理诊断为表皮下自身免疫性大疱性疾病,而其余患者(18.9%)经临床和组织学诊断为其他炎症性皮肤病,但在随访期间均未发生天疱疮。值得注意的是,同期诊断为大疱性类天疱疮(BP)的所有患者(n = 328)中有7.0%(n = 23)的IgG细胞间抗体检测呈阳性。对这些患者活检标本的组织病理学检查未发现棘层松解。总之,IIF检测猴食管结果为阴性的预测价值在排除天疱疮诊断方面特别可靠。细胞间抗体检测呈阳性但最初无明显天疱疮表现的个体随后发生天疱疮的风险并未增加。相当一部分BP患者通过IIF显示循环细胞间自身抗体,但无棘层松解的组织病理学证据。