Suppr超能文献

大地理距离与小 DNA 条码分歧:来自欧洲与南西伯利亚鳞翅目比较的启示。

Large geographic distance versus small DNA barcode divergence: Insights from a comparison of European to South Siberian Lepidoptera.

机构信息

Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen, Tiroler Landesmuseen Betriebsges.m.b.H., Innsbruck, Austria.

Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 2;13(11):e0206668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206668. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Spanning nearly 13,000 km, the Palearctic region provides an opportunity to examine the level of geographic coverage required for a DNA barcode reference library to be effective in identifying species with broad ranges. This study examines barcode divergences between populations of 102 species of Lepidoptera from Europe and South Siberia, sites roughly 6,000 km apart. While three-quarters of these species showed divergence between their Asian and European populations, these divergence values ranged between 0-1%, distinctly less than the distance to the Nearest-Neighbor species in all but a few cases. Our results suggest that further taxonomic studies may be required for 16 species that showed either extremely low interspecific or high intraspecific variation. For example, seven species pairs showed low or no barcode divergence, but four of these cases are likely to reflect taxonomic over-splitting while the others involve species pairs that are either young or show evidence for introgression. Conversely, some of the nine species with deep intraspecific divergence at varied spatial levels may include overlooked species. Although these 16 cases require further investigation, our overall results indicate that barcode reference libraries based on records from one locality can be very effective in identifying specimens across an extensive geographic area.

摘要

横跨近 13000 公里,古北区为研究 DNA 条码参考图书馆在识别具有广泛分布范围的物种时所需的地理覆盖水平提供了机会。本研究调查了来自欧洲和南西伯利亚的 102 种鳞翅目物种的种群之间的条码分歧,这两个地点相距约 6000 公里。尽管这些物种中有四分之三的亚洲和欧洲种群之间存在分歧,但这些分歧值在除了少数情况之外的所有情况下都在 0-1%之间,明显小于最近邻种之间的距离。我们的结果表明,对于表现出极低种间或高度种内变异的 16 个物种,可能需要进一步的分类学研究。例如,有 7 个种对表现出低或无条码分歧,但其中 4 个可能反映了分类过度分裂,而其他的则涉及年轻或存在基因渗入的种对。相反,在不同空间水平上具有深刻种内分歧的 9 个物种中,可能包括被忽视的物种。尽管这 16 个案例需要进一步调查,但我们的总体结果表明,基于一个地点记录的条码参考图书馆可以非常有效地识别广泛地理区域内的标本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b37/6214556/1ea953c9ed98/pone.0206668.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验