Bose Montu, Dutta Arijita
Department of Business & Sustainability, TERI School of Advanced Studies, New Delhi, India.
Department of Economics, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 3;18(1):830. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3633-5.
To achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, Indian States have implemented different strategies to arrest high out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) and to increase equity into healthcare system. Tamil Nadu (TN) and Rajasthan have implemented free medicine scheme in all public hospitals and West Bengal (WB) has devised Fair Price Medicine Shop (FPMS) scheme, a public-private-partnership model in the state. In this background, the objectives of the paper are to - 1. Study the utilization pattern of public in-patient care facilities for the states, 2. Examine the effectiveness of the strategies adopted by the states to arrest high OOPE and 3. Analyze the extent of equity in public in-patient care services in the states.
National Sample Survey (71st and 60th round) data, Detailed Demand for Grants of the state governments and the National Rural/Urban Health Mission data have been used for the study. Exploratory data analysis and benefit incidence analysis have been applied to estimate the utilization, OOPE and extend of equity in the states.
The results show that overall utilization of public facilities in TN and Rajasthan has increased substantially; whereas, utilization of public facility has decreased in WB even among the poorest. In addition, OOPE for both medical and medicine is the highest in WB among three states for public sector hospitalizations. Surprisingly, OOPE on medicine is the highest for the poorest class of WB. Analysis showed that the mismatch between actual need and FPMS drug-list has led to high OOPE in the state. Overall, benefit incidence of public subsidy is the highest among the poorest class in all the states. However, geographical sector-wise inequity in public subsidy distribution persists in the states. Analysis of cost of inpatient care shows that TN provides the maximum subsidy for hospitalization and WB provides the minimum. An inverse relationship between utilization of inpatient care and public subsidy has been observed from the analysis.
In conclusion we could say that TN & Rajasthan have successfully implemented their health financing strategies to reduce the health expenditure burden. However, policy-level changes are required to improve the situation in WB.
为实现可持续发展目标,印度各邦实施了不同战略,以遏制高额自付费用(OOPE)并提高医疗体系的公平性。泰米尔纳德邦(TN)和拉贾斯坦邦已在所有公立医院实施免费药品计划,西孟加拉邦(WB)则设计了平价药店(FPMS)计划,这是该邦的一种公私合作模式。在此背景下,本文的目标是:1. 研究各邦公立住院护理设施的使用模式;2. 检验各邦为遏制高额自付费用所采取战略的有效性;3. 分析各邦公立住院护理服务的公平程度。
本研究使用了全国抽样调查(第71轮和第60轮)数据、邦政府的详细拨款需求数据以及国家农村/城市卫生使命数据。探索性数据分析和受益发生率分析已被用于估计各邦的使用情况、自付费用和公平程度。
结果表明,TN和拉贾斯坦邦公立设施的总体使用率大幅提高;而在WB,即使是最贫困人群中,公立设施的使用率也有所下降。此外,在这三个邦中,WB公立部门住院治疗的医疗和药品自付费用最高。令人惊讶的是,WB最贫困阶层的药品自付费用最高。分析表明,实际需求与FPMS药品清单之间的不匹配导致该邦自付费用高昂。总体而言,所有邦中最贫困阶层获得公共补贴的受益发生率最高。然而各邦在公共补贴分配方面仍存在地理区域层面的不公平现象。住院护理成本分析表明,TN为住院治疗提供的补贴最多,而WB提供的最少。分析发现住院护理使用率与公共补贴之间存在反比关系。
总之,我们可以说TN和拉贾斯坦邦已成功实施其卫生筹资战略,以减轻卫生支出负担。然而,需要在政策层面进行变革,以改善WB的状况。