• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度公立和私立医疗中心剖宫产的自费支出及相关因素。

Out-of-pocket expenditure and correlates of caesarean births in public and private health centres in India.

机构信息

Department of Fertility Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.

International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2019 Mar;224:45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.048. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.048
PMID:30738236
Abstract

Increasing caesarean births is a global trend and of recent origin in India. Besides its utility and disutility, increasing caesarean births exert higher economic burden on households and the nation. Using 148,746 births from the National Family Health Survey, 2015-16, this paper examines the correlates and provides comparable estimates of out of pocket expenditure (OOPE) on caesarean births in public and private health centres in India. The monthly state specific rural-urban consumer price index and the OOPE on births over seven years are used to derive comparable OOPE estimate at 2016 prices. A composite variable combining type of birth and place of delivery is computed and classified as private and caesarean, public and caesarean, private and non-caesarean, public and non-caesarean. Descriptive statistics, logistic and tobit regression model were used to understand the differentials and determinants of OOPE on caesarean births. Caesarean births were significantly higher among mothers belonging to higher socioeconomic status, first order births, mothers with high BMI, pregnancy complications, repeat caesarean and in private health centres confirming that both maternal demand and institutional factors are leading to the increasing in caesarean rates in India. The mean OOPE of caesarean births in public health centres of poorer states was higher than that in the richer states of India (US$107 in low performing states compared to US$88 in high performing states) while such differentials across private health centres are small. The marginal effect of a caesarean birth in private health centres in low performing states was US$296 dollar higher than that of non-caesarean births. Improving the public health centres for conducting caesarean births, developing standard guideline for clinical practices in conducting caesarean births and creating awareness on comprehensive pregnancy care can reduce the caesarean rates and OOPE on caesarean birth in India.

摘要

剖宫产分娩的增加是一个全球性趋势,在印度是最近才出现的现象。除了其效用和弊端之外,剖宫产分娩的增加也给家庭和国家带来了更高的经济负担。本文利用 2015-16 年全国家庭健康调查中的 148746 例分娩数据,研究了剖宫产分娩的相关因素,并提供了在印度公立和私立医疗中心进行剖宫产分娩的自费支出(OOP)的可比估计。使用特定于州的每月农村-城市消费价格指数和七年期间的分娩 OOPE,将其换算为 2016 年价格的可比 OOPE 估计值。本文计算了一个结合分娩类型和分娩地点的综合变量,并将其分类为私立和剖宫产、公立和剖宫产、私立和非剖宫产、公立和非剖宫产。本文使用描述性统计、逻辑和 Tobit 回归模型来了解剖宫产自费支出的差异和决定因素。结果显示,社会经济地位较高、初产妇、BMI 较高、妊娠并发症、重复剖宫产以及在私立医疗中心分娩的母亲,剖宫产分娩的比例明显更高,这表明产妇需求和医疗机构因素都导致了印度剖宫产率的上升。较贫穷州的公立医院剖宫产自费支出的平均值高于印度较富裕州(表现较差的州为 107 美元,表现较好的州为 88 美元),而私立医疗中心之间的差异较小。在表现较差的州,私立医疗中心的剖宫产分娩的边际效应比非剖宫产分娩高出 296 美元。改善公立医院进行剖宫产的条件、制定剖宫产临床实践标准并提高全面妊娠护理意识,可以降低印度的剖宫产率和剖宫产自费支出。

相似文献

1
Out-of-pocket expenditure and correlates of caesarean births in public and private health centres in India.印度公立和私立医疗中心剖宫产的自费支出及相关因素。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Mar;224:45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.048. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
2
Out of pocket expenditure and distress financing on cesarean delivery in India: evidence from NFHS-5.印度剖宫产的自费支出和困境融资:来自 NFHS-5 的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 7;23(1):966. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09980-w.
3
Out-of-pocket expenditure and distress financing on institutional delivery in India.印度机构分娩的自付支出和困境融资。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 25;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1001-7.
4
Out-of-pocket expenditure and catastrophic health spending on maternal care in public and private health centres in India: a comparative study of pre and post national health mission period.印度公立和私立医疗中心孕产妇保健的自付费用和灾难性医疗支出:国家卫生使命前后时期的比较研究
Health Econ Rev. 2017 Sep 18;7(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13561-017-0167-1.
5
High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities- analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India.私营部门医疗机构剖宫产率较高——印度第四次地区层面家庭调查(DLHS-4)分析。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 10;18(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5533-3.
6
Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in private and public health facilities in underserved South Asian communities: cross-sectional analysis of data from Bangladesh, India and Nepal.南亚贫困社区私立和公立医疗机构剖宫产的患病率及影响因素:对孟加拉国、印度和尼泊尔数据的横断面分析
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 30;4(12):e005982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005982.
7
Assessment of Variation in Cesarean Delivery Rates Between Public and Private Health Facilities in India From 2005 to 2016.评估 2005 年至 2016 年期间印度公立和私立医疗机构之间剖宫产率的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2015022. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15022.
8
Out-of-pocket expenditure on prenatal and natal care post Janani Suraksha Yojana: a case from Rajasthan, India.贾纳尼·苏拉克莎·尤佳娜(Janani Suraksha Yojana)实施后产前和产后护理的自付费用:来自印度拉贾斯坦邦的案例
J Health Popul Nutr. 2016 May 20;35:15. doi: 10.1186/s41043-016-0051-3.
9
Health financing strategies to reduce out-of-pocket burden in India: a comparative study of three states.印度减轻自付负担的卫生筹资策略:三个邦的比较研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 3;18(1):830. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3633-5.
10
Out-of-pocket expenditure and its correlates for institutional deliveries in private and public healthcare sectors in India: findings from NFHS 5.印度私人和公共医疗保健部门机构分娩的自费支出及其相关因素:来自 NFHS 5 的调查结果。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 2;23(1):1474. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16352-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding out-of-pocket expenditure in India: a systematic review.了解印度的自付费用:一项系统综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 9;13:1594542. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1594542. eCollection 2025.
2
Preventing the preventable: Assessing the burden of incessant caesarean deliveries in select Indian states using NFHS-5.预防可预防之事:利用第五轮全国家庭健康调查评估印度部分邦持续剖宫产的负担。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 23;20(4):e0320041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320041. eCollection 2025.
3
Out of pocket expenditure and distress financing on cesarean delivery in India: evidence from NFHS-5.
印度剖宫产的自费支出和困境融资:来自 NFHS-5 的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 7;23(1):966. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09980-w.
4
Out-of-pocket expenditure and its correlates for institutional deliveries in private and public healthcare sectors in India: findings from NFHS 5.印度私人和公共医疗保健部门机构分娩的自费支出及其相关因素:来自 NFHS 5 的调查结果。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 2;23(1):1474. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16352-w.
5
Prevalence and correlates of low birth weight in India: findings from national family health survey 5.印度低出生体重的流行情况及其相关因素:全国家庭健康调查 5 的结果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jun 20;23(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05726-y.
6
Sterilization incentives and associated regret among ever married women in India, NFHS, 2015-16.印度已婚女性的绝育激励措施及其相关遗憾,NFHS,2015-16 年。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 19;22(1):1063. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08401-8.
7
Are cesarean deliveries equitable in India: assessment using benefit incidence analysis.印度的剖宫产是否公平:使用受益归属分析进行评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 18;22(1):670. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07984-6.
8
Accessing Maternal Health Care in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study in Two Districts of Assam, India.在新冠疫情期间获取孕产妇保健服务:印度阿萨姆邦两个地区的研究
Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Mar 31;3:750520. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.750520. eCollection 2022.
9
Geographical variability and factors associated with caesarean section delivery in India: a comparative assessment of Bihar and Tamil Nadu.印度剖宫产率的地域差异及其影响因素:比哈尔邦和泰米尔纳德邦的比较评估。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 21;21(1):1715. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11750-4.
10
Addressing data and methodological limitations in estimating catastrophic health spending and impoverishment in India, 2004-18.解决印度 2004-18 年估算灾难性卫生支出和贫困的数据分析和方法学局限性。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 20;20(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01421-6.