Culbertson Jennifer, Newport Elissa L
School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh.
Department of Neurology, Georgetown University.
Open Mind (Camb). 2017 Spring;1(2):91-100. doi: 10.1162/OPMI_a_00010.
The tendency for languages to use word order patterns-orders that place heads in a consistent position with respect to modifiers or other dependents-has been noted since the 1960s. As with many other statistical typological tendencies, there has been debate regarding whether harmony reflects properties of human cognition or forces external to it. Recent research using laboratory language learning has shown that children and adults find harmonic patterns easier to learn than nonharmonic patterns (Culbertson & Newport, 2015; Culbertson, Smolensky, & Legendre, 2012). This supports a link between learning and typological frequency: if harmonic patterns are easier to learn, while nonharmonic patterns are more likely to be targets of change, then, all things equal, harmonic patterns will be more frequent in the world's languages. However, these previous studies relied on variation in the input as a mechanism for change in the lab; learners were exposed to variable word order, allowing them to shift the frequencies of different orders so that harmonic patterns became more frequent. Here we teach adult and child learners languages that are consistently nonharmonic, with no variation. While adults perfectly maintain these consistently nonharmonic patterns, young child learners innovate novel orders, changing nonharmonic patterns into harmonic ones.
自20世纪60年代以来,人们就已经注意到语言倾向于使用词序模式——即将中心词置于相对于修饰语或其他从属成分的一致位置的词序模式。与许多其他统计类型学倾向一样,关于和谐性是反映人类认知的属性还是外部力量,一直存在争议。最近使用实验室语言学习的研究表明,儿童和成人发现和谐模式比不和谐模式更容易学习(卡尔伯森和纽波特,2015年;卡尔伯森、斯莫伦斯基和勒让德,2012年)。这支持了学习与类型学频率之间的联系:如果和谐模式更容易学习,而不和谐模式更有可能成为变化的目标,那么,在其他条件相同的情况下,和谐模式在世界语言中将会更频繁。然而,这些先前的研究依赖于输入中的变化作为实验室中的变化机制;学习者接触到可变的词序,从而使他们能够改变不同词序的频率,以便和谐模式变得更加频繁。在这里,我们向成人和儿童学习者教授始终不和谐且没有变化的语言。虽然成年人完美地保持了这些始终不和谐的模式,但幼儿学习者却创新了新的词序,将不和谐模式转变为和谐模式。