• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童学习者中的调和偏差:支持语言普遍性

Harmonic biases in child learners: in support of language universals.

作者信息

Culbertson Jennifer, Newport Elissa L

机构信息

Linguistics and English Language, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AD, UK.

Center for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2015 Jun;139:71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.007
PMID:25800352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4397919/
Abstract

A fundamental question for cognitive science concerns the ways in which languages are shaped by the biases of language learners. Recent research using laboratory language learning paradigms, primarily with adults, has shown that structures or rules that are common in the languages of the world are learned or processed more easily than patterns that are rare or unattested. Here we target child learners, investigating a set of biases for word order learning in the noun phrase studied by Culbertson, Smolensky, and Legendre (2012) in college-age adults. We provide the first evidence that child learners exhibit a preference for typologically common harmonic word order patterns-those which preserve the order of the head with respect to its complements-validating the psychological reality of a principle formalized in many different linguistic theories. We also discuss important differences between child and adult learners in terms of both the strength and content of the biases at play during language learning. In particular, the bias favoring harmonic patterns is markedly stronger in children than adults, and children (unlike adults) acquire adjective ordering more readily than numeral ordering. The results point to the importance of investigating learning biases across development in order to understand how these biases may shape the history and structure of natural languages.

摘要

认知科学的一个基本问题涉及语言学习者的偏好塑造语言的方式。最近使用实验室语言学习范式(主要针对成年人)的研究表明,世界语言中常见的结构或规则比罕见或未被证实的模式更容易被学习或处理。在此,我们以儿童学习者为研究对象,调查库尔伯特森、斯莫伦斯基和勒让德(2012年)在大学生中研究的名词短语中词序学习的一组偏好。我们提供了首个证据,表明儿童学习者表现出对类型学上常见的和谐词序模式的偏好——即那些保持中心语相对于其补足语顺序的模式——从而证实了在许多不同语言理论中形式化的一个原则在心理层面的真实性。我们还讨论了儿童和成人学习者在语言学习过程中偏好的强度和内容方面的重要差异。特别是,儿童比成年人更明显地偏好和谐模式,并且儿童(与成年人不同)比数字顺序更容易习得形容词顺序。研究结果表明,研究不同发展阶段的学习偏好对于理解这些偏好如何塑造自然语言的历史和结构很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad38/4397919/fd8348cc6bf0/nihms670596f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad38/4397919/37062feabc7d/nihms670596f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad38/4397919/22092198f18d/nihms670596f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad38/4397919/2685a0a82653/nihms670596f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad38/4397919/fafca4664ec4/nihms670596f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad38/4397919/118cba496e08/nihms670596f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad38/4397919/fd8348cc6bf0/nihms670596f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad38/4397919/37062feabc7d/nihms670596f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad38/4397919/22092198f18d/nihms670596f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad38/4397919/2685a0a82653/nihms670596f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad38/4397919/fafca4664ec4/nihms670596f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad38/4397919/118cba496e08/nihms670596f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad38/4397919/fd8348cc6bf0/nihms670596f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Harmonic biases in child learners: in support of language universals.儿童学习者中的调和偏差:支持语言普遍性
Cognition. 2015 Jun;139:71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 Mar 22.
2
Cognitive biases, linguistic universals, and constraint-based grammar learning.认知偏差、语言共性与基于约束的语法学习。
Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;5(3):392-424. doi: 10.1111/tops.12027. Epub 2013 May 23.
3
Learning biases predict a word order universal.学习偏见预测了一种语序普遍性。
Cognition. 2012 Mar;122(3):306-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.017. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
4
A learning bias for word order harmony: Evidence from speakers of non-harmonic languages.对语序和谐的学习偏好:来自非和谐语言使用者的证据。
Cognition. 2020 Nov;204:104392. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104392. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
5
A Bayesian model of biases in artificial language learning: the case of a word-order universal.人工语言学习中的偏差的贝叶斯模型:词序普遍性的案例。
Cogn Sci. 2012 Nov-Dec;36(8):1468-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01264.x. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
6
Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across Development.跨发展的词序和谐创新。
Open Mind (Camb). 2017 Spring;1(2):91-100. doi: 10.1162/OPMI_a_00010.
7
Learning bias, cultural evolution of language, and the biological evolution of the language faculty.学习偏差、语言的文化演变与语言官能的生物进化。
Hum Biol. 2011 Apr;83(2):261-78. doi: 10.3378/027.083.0207.
8
Systematicity, but not compositionality: Examining the emergence of linguistic structure in children and adults using iterated learning.系统性而非构成性:使用迭代学习研究儿童和成人语言结构的出现。
Cognition. 2018 Dec;181:160-173. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
9
Substantive learning bias or an effect of familiarity? Comment on Culbertson, Smolensky, and Legendre (2012).实质性学习偏差还是熟悉度的影响?评论 Culbertson、Smolensky 和 Legendre(2012)。
Cognition. 2013 Jun;127(3):420-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.017. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
10
Language evolution can be shaped by the structure of the world.语言的演变会受到世界结构的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2014 May-Jun;38(4):775-93. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12102. Epub 2014 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A Simple Explanation for Harmonic Word Order.关于和谐词序的一个简单解释。
Cogn Sci. 2025 Apr;49(4):e70056. doi: 10.1111/cogs.70056.
2
Language structure reflects biases in pattern learning across domains and modalities.语言结构反映了跨领域和模态的模式学习中的偏差。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Jul;78(7):1303-1320. doi: 10.1177/17470218241282404. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
3
LANGUAGE EXPOSURE PREDICTS CHILDREN'S PHONETIC PATTERNING: EVIDENCE FROM LANGUAGE SHIFT.语言接触可预测儿童的语音模式:来自语言转换的证据。

本文引用的文献

1
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
2
Cognitive biases, linguistic universals, and constraint-based grammar learning.认知偏差、语言共性与基于约束的语法学习。
Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;5(3):392-424. doi: 10.1111/tops.12027. Epub 2013 May 23.
3
Substantive learning bias or an effect of familiarity? Comment on Culbertson, Smolensky, and Legendre (2012).实质性学习偏差还是熟悉度的影响?评论 Culbertson、Smolensky 和 Legendre(2012)。
Language (Baltim). 2022 Sep;98(3):461-509. doi: 10.1353/lan.0.0269.
4
Kindergarteners Use Cross-Situational Statistics to Infer the Meaning of Grammatical Elements.幼儿园儿童通过跨情境统计推断语法元素的意义。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Dec;51(6):1311-1333. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09898-0. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
5
Learning a language from inconsistent input: Regularization in child and adult learners.从不一致的输入中学习语言:儿童和成人学习者的正则化
Lang Learn Dev. 2022;18(3):249-277. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2021.1954927. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
6
Category Clustering and Morphological Learning.类别聚类和形态学学习。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Feb;46(2):e13107. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13107.
7
The Role of the Learner in the Cultural Evolution of Vocalizations.学习者在发声文化演变中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 13;12:667455. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.667455. eCollection 2021.
8
How Wide the Divide? - Theorizing 'Constructions' in Generative and Usage-Based Frameworks.分歧有多大?——在生成式框架和基于用法的框架中对“结构”进行理论化
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 26;12:601303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601303. eCollection 2021.
9
Is there a critical period for L1 but not L2?对于第一语言(L1)存在关键期而第二语言(L2)不存在吗?
Biling (Camb Engl). 2018 Nov;21(5):928-929. doi: 10.1017/S1366728918000305. Epub 2018 May 18.
10
The Developmental Origins of Syntactic Bootstrapping.句法启动的发展起源。
Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Jan;12(1):48-77. doi: 10.1111/tops.12447. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
Cognition. 2013 Jun;127(3):420-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.017. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
4
Language learners restructure their input to facilitate efficient communication.语言学习者会对输入的语言进行重组,以促进有效的交流。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 30;109(44):17897-902. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215776109. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
5
A Bayesian model of biases in artificial language learning: the case of a word-order universal.人工语言学习中的偏差的贝叶斯模型:词序普遍性的案例。
Cogn Sci. 2012 Nov-Dec;36(8):1468-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01264.x. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
6
Learning biases predict a word order universal.学习偏见预测了一种语序普遍性。
Cognition. 2012 Mar;122(3):306-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.017. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
7
Learning phonology with substantive bias: an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization.带有实质偏见的语音学习:关于软腭化的实验和计算研究。
Cogn Sci. 2006 Sep 10;30(5):945-82. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_89.
8
Relationships between language structure and language learning: the suffixing preference and grammatical categorization.语言结构与语言学习的关系:后缀偏好与语法分类。
Cogn Sci. 2009 Sep;33(7):1317-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01065.x.
9
Phonemic diversity supports a serial founder effect model of language expansion from Africa.音位多样性支持语言从非洲扩张的串行起源效应模型。
Science. 2011 Apr 15;332(6027):346-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1199295.
10
Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals.语言的进化结构显示了语序共性在谱系特异性方面的趋势。
Nature. 2011 May 5;473(7345):79-82. doi: 10.1038/nature09923. Epub 2011 Apr 13.