• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

类别聚类和形态学学习。

Category Clustering and Morphological Learning.

机构信息

School of Languages and Linguistics, University of Melbourne.

Department of Comparative Language Science, University of Zurich.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2022 Feb;46(2):e13107. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13107.

DOI:10.1111/cogs.13107
PMID:35166378
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9285891/
Abstract

Inflectional affixes expressing the same grammatical category (e.g., subject agreement) tend to appear in the same morphological position in the word. We hypothesize that this cross-linguistic tendency toward category clustering is at least partly the result of a learning bias, which facilitates the transmission of morphology from one generation to the next if each inflectional category has a consistent morphological position. We test this in an online artificial language experiment, teaching adult English speakers a miniature language consisting of noun stems representing shapes and suffixes representing the color and number features of each shape. In one experimental condition, each suffix category has a fixed position, with color in the first position and number in the second position. In a second condition, each specific combination of suffixes has a fixed order, but some combinations have color in the first position, and some have number in the first position. In a third condition, suffixes are randomly ordered on each presentation. While the language in the first condition is consistent with the category clustering principle, those in the other conditions are not. Our results indicate that category clustering of inflectional affixes facilitates morphological learning, at least in adult English speakers. Moreover, we found that languages that violate category clustering but still follow fixed affix ordering patterns are more learnable than languages with random ordering. Altogether, our results provide evidence for individual biases toward category clustering; we suggest that this bias may play a causal role in shaping the typological regularities in affix order we find in natural language.

摘要

表达同一语法范畴的屈折词缀(例如,主语一致)往往出现在单词的相同形态位置。我们假设这种跨语言的范畴聚类趋势至少部分是学习偏差的结果,如果每个屈折范畴都有一个一致的形态位置,那么这种偏差有助于形态从一代传递到下一代。我们在一个在线人工语言实验中对此进行了测试,向成年英语使用者教授一种由表示形状的名词词干和表示每种形状颜色和数量特征的后缀组成的微型语言。在一个实验条件下,每个后缀类别都有一个固定的位置,颜色在第一位,数量在第二位。在第二个条件下,每个特定的后缀组合都有一个固定的顺序,但有些组合的颜色在第一位,有些组合的数量在第一位。在第三个条件下,后缀在每次呈现时都是随机排序的。虽然第一种条件下的语言与范畴聚类原则一致,但其他条件下的语言则不一致。我们的结果表明,屈折词缀的范畴聚类有助于形态学习,至少在成年英语使用者中是这样。此外,我们发现,违反范畴聚类但仍遵循固定词缀顺序模式的语言比具有随机顺序的语言更易于学习。总之,我们的结果为个体对范畴聚类的偏见提供了证据;我们认为,这种偏见可能在塑造自然语言中我们发现的词缀顺序的类型学规律方面发挥了因果作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e53/9285891/309b55c4f46d/COGS-46-0-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e53/9285891/0a6fc565a8e0/COGS-46-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e53/9285891/4333cb144ec2/COGS-46-0-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e53/9285891/ed02806bef0a/COGS-46-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e53/9285891/de98cd32ca44/COGS-46-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e53/9285891/486d54241611/COGS-46-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e53/9285891/309b55c4f46d/COGS-46-0-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e53/9285891/0a6fc565a8e0/COGS-46-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e53/9285891/4333cb144ec2/COGS-46-0-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e53/9285891/ed02806bef0a/COGS-46-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e53/9285891/de98cd32ca44/COGS-46-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e53/9285891/486d54241611/COGS-46-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e53/9285891/309b55c4f46d/COGS-46-0-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Category Clustering and Morphological Learning.类别聚类和形态学学习。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Feb;46(2):e13107. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13107.
2
A learning bias for word order harmony: Evidence from speakers of non-harmonic languages.对语序和谐的学习偏好:来自非和谐语言使用者的证据。
Cognition. 2020 Nov;204:104392. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104392. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
3
Order Matters! Influences of Linear Order on Linguistic Category Learning.语序很重要!线性语序对语言范畴学习的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Nov;44(11):e12910. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12910.
4
Production of noun suffixes by Turkish-speaking children with developmental language disorder and their typically developing peers.土耳其语发展性语言障碍儿童与正常发展儿童对名词后缀的产出。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 May;55(3):387-400. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12525. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
5
Cognitive and linguistic biases in morphology learning.形态学学习中的认知和语言偏差
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2018 Sep;9(5):e1467. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1467. Epub 2018 May 30.
6
Learning biases predict a word order universal.学习偏见预测了一种语序普遍性。
Cognition. 2012 Mar;122(3):306-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.017. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
7
Balancing Effort and Information Transmission During Language Acquisition: Evidence From Word Order and Case Marking.语言习得过程中努力与信息传递的平衡:来自词序和格标记的证据。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Mar;41(2):416-446. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12346. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
8
A Universal Cognitive Bias in Word Order: Evidence From Speakers Whose Language Goes Against It.语序的普遍认知偏差:来自语言违背这一规则的说话者的证据。
Psychol Sci. 2024 Mar;35(3):304-311. doi: 10.1177/09567976231222836. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
9
A cross-linguistic examination of the noun-category bias: its existence and specificity in French- and Spanish-speaking preschool-aged children.名词类别偏差的跨语言研究:其在说法语和西班牙语的学龄前儿童中的存在及特殊性
Cogn Psychol. 1997 Apr;32(3):183-218. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0650.
10
Caregivers' suffix frequencies and suffix acquisition by language impaired, late talking, and typically developing children.照顾者的后缀频率和语言障碍、说话晚和正常发展的儿童的后缀习得。
J Child Lang. 2012 Nov;39(5):1017-42. doi: 10.1017/S0305000911000390. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A Simple Explanation for Harmonic Word Order.关于和谐词序的一个简单解释。
Cogn Sci. 2025 Apr;49(4):e70056. doi: 10.1111/cogs.70056.

本文引用的文献

1
How individuals change language.个体如何改变语言。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 2;16(6):e0252582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252582. eCollection 2021.
2
What makes a language easy to learn? A preregistered study on how systematic structure and community size affect language learnability.什么样的语言更容易学?一项关于系统性结构和社群规模如何影响语言可学度的预先注册研究。
Cognition. 2021 May;210:104620. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104620. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
3
Revisiting the Suffixing Preference: Native-Language Affixation Patterns Influence Perception of Sequences.
重新审视后缀偏好:本族语的词缀模式影响对序列的感知。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Sep;31(9):1107-1116. doi: 10.1177/0956797620931108. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
4
A learning bias for word order harmony: Evidence from speakers of non-harmonic languages.对语序和谐的学习偏好:来自非和谐语言使用者的证据。
Cognition. 2020 Nov;204:104392. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104392. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
5
Linguistic Convergence to Observed Versus Expected Behavior in an Alien-Language Map Task.语言趋同对陌生语言地图任务中观察到的与预期行为的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;44(4):e12829. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12829.
6
Mechanical Turk data collection in addiction research: utility, concerns and best practices.在成瘾研究中使用 Mechanical Turk 进行数据收集:效用、关注点和最佳实践。
Addiction. 2020 Oct;115(10):1960-1968. doi: 10.1111/add.15032. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
7
Larger communities create more systematic languages.较大的社区创造出更系统的语言。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jul 24;286(1907):20191262. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1262. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
8
Innovation of Word Order Harmony Across Development.跨发展的词序和谐创新。
Open Mind (Camb). 2017 Spring;1(2):91-100. doi: 10.1162/OPMI_a_00010.
9
Acquiring variation in an artificial language: Children and adults are sensitive to socially conditioned linguistic variation.在人造语言中习得语言变体:儿童和成人对社会条件制约下的语言变体很敏感。
Cogn Psychol. 2017 May;94:85-114. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
10
Language learning, language use and the evolution of linguistic variation.语言学习、语言使用与语言变异的演变
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Jan 5;372(1711). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0051.