Health Works (Formerly HealthNet TPO), Lizzy Ansinghstraat 163, 1072 RG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
National Malaria and Leishmaniasis Control Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Darul Aman Road, Sanatoriam Street, Kabul, Afghanistan.
EBioMedicine. 2018 Nov;37:453-460. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.10.063. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
Kabul (Afghanistan) is a major focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) caused by Leishmania tropica. Microscopy remains the reference test for diagnosis despite its low performance. We evaluated whether Loopamp™ Leishmania Detection Kit (Loopamp) and CL Detect™ Rapid Test (CL Detect), detecting Leishmania DNA and antigen, respectively could improve CL diagnosis.
A diagnostic accuracy study with prospective inclusion was conducted in a leishmaniasis reference clinic in Kabul. Slit skin samples from CL suspects were analysed by microscopy. Samples taken with a dental broach were tested with CL Detect, Loopamp, and PCR. All samples were transferred to the Academic Medical Center (AMC, the Netherlands) for PCR and Loopamp analyses. The diagnostic performance of the tests was evaluated against a reference combining microscopy and PCR.
274 CL suspects were included in the study. In Kabul, CL Detect had a 65·4% sensitivity [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 59.2-71.2%] and a 100% specificity [95% CI: 80.5-100%], while these were 87.6% [95%CI: 82.9-91.3%] and 70.6% [95% CI: 44.0-89.7%] for Loopamp. At AMC the Loopamp's sensitivity (92.2% [95% CI: 88.2-95.2%]) and specificity (94.1% [95% CI: 71.3-99.8%]) were higher. An algorithm where CL Detect negative suspects would be tested by Loopamp yielded a 93.4% sensitivity [95% CI: 89.6-96.1%] and a 94.1% specificity [95% CI: 71.3-99.8%] when Loopamp's performance at AMC was used.
The high specificity of CL Detect and the performance of Loopamp allow their use in a diagnostic algorithm that would minimize the number of CL patients referred for confirmation. FUND: Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany.
喀布尔(阿富汗)是由热带利什曼原虫引起的皮肤利什曼病(CL)的主要焦点。尽管其性能较低,但显微镜检查仍然是参考测试。我们评估了分别检测利什曼原虫 DNA 和抗原的 Loopamp™利什曼检测试剂盒(Loopamp)和 CL Detect™快速检测试剂盒(CL Detect)是否可以改善 CL 诊断。
在喀布尔的一个利什曼病参考诊所进行了前瞻性纳入的诊断准确性研究。通过显微镜分析疑似 CL 的皮肤切片。用牙锉采集的样本用 CL Detect、Loopamp 和 PCR 进行检测。所有样本均转移至学术医学中心(荷兰 AMC)进行 PCR 和 Loopamp 分析。将这些测试的诊断性能与结合显微镜和 PCR 的参考标准进行了比较。
共纳入 274 例疑似 CL 患者。在喀布尔,CL Detect 的敏感性为 65.4%[95%置信区间(CI):59.2-71.2%],特异性为 100%[95%CI:80.5-100%],而 Loopamp 的敏感性为 87.6%[95%CI:82.9-91.3%],特异性为 70.6%[95% CI:44.0-89.7%]。在 AMC,Loopamp 的敏感性(92.2%[95% CI:88.2-95.2%])和特异性(94.1%[95% CI:71.3-99.8%])更高。如果使用 AMC 时 Loopamp 的性能,将 CL Detect 阴性疑似患者的检测结果用 Loopamp 进行检测的算法,其敏感性为 93.4%[95% CI:89.6-96.1%],特异性为 94.1%[95% CI:71.3-99.8%]。
CL Detect 的高特异性和 Loopamp 的性能允许将其用于诊断算法,从而最大限度地减少需要确认的 CL 患者数量。资金:德国联邦教育与研究部。