Suppr超能文献

医学教育技术标准的领先实践和未来方向。

Leading Practices and Future Directions for Technical Standards in Medical Education.

机构信息

L.B. Kezar is professor, Departments of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Medical Education, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama. K.L. Kirschner is clinical professor, Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois College of Medicine, adjunct professor of disability and human development, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, and attending physician, Schwab Rehabilitation Hospital, Chicago, Illinois. D.M. Clinchot is vice dean for education, associate vice president for health sciences, professor of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio. E. Laird-Metke is director, Disability Resource Center, Samuel Merritt University, Oakland, California. P. Zazove is George A. Dean, M.D. Chair and professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan. R.H. Curry is senior associate dean for educational affairs, University of Illinois College of Medicine, and professor of medicine and medical education, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2019 Apr;94(4):520-527. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002517.

Abstract

The medical profession first addressed the need for technical standards (TS), defining the nonacademic requirements deemed essential for participation in an educational program, in guidelines published by the Association of American Medical Colleges in 1979. Despite many changes in the practice of medicine and legal, cultural, and technological advances that afford greater opportunities for people with disabilities, the profession's approach to TS largely has not changed over the ensuing four decades. Although physicians with disabilities bring unique perspectives to medicine and contribute to a diverse physician workforce of culturally competent practitioners, they remain underrepresented in the profession.As part of an initiative sponsored by the Association of Academic Physiatrists, the authors describe the need for an updated TS framework, outlining interval changes in the legal and regulatory climate, medical practice, and medical education since the initial TS guidelines were put forth. They conclude by offering eight recommendations and two functional approaches to TS that are consistent with now-prevalent competency-based medical education constructs.The profession's commitment to diversity and inclusion should extend explicitly to people with disabilities, and this stance should be clearly communicated through medical schools' TS and procedures for requesting accommodations. To this end, schools should consider the principles of universal design to create policies and assessments that work for all learners, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for after-the-fact accommodations. A thoughtful and concerted effort along these lines is long overdue in medical education.

摘要

医学界首次提出技术标准(TS)的需求,在 1979 年由美国医学协会(Association of American Medical Colleges)发布的指南中定义了被认为是参与教育项目所必需的非学术要求。尽管医学实践发生了许多变化,法律、文化和技术也取得了进步,为残疾人提供了更多的机会,但在随后的四十年里,该行业对 TS 的方法基本上没有改变。尽管残疾医生为医学带来了独特的视角,并为具有文化能力的多元化医生队伍做出了贡献,但他们在该行业的代表性仍然不足。

作为学术物理治疗师协会(Association of Academic Physiatrists)发起的一项倡议的一部分,作者描述了更新 TS 框架的必要性,概述了自最初的 TS 指南发布以来,法律和监管环境、医学实践和医学教育的间隔变化。他们最后提出了八项建议和两种符合当前流行的基于能力的医学教育结构的 TS 功能方法。该行业对多样性和包容性的承诺应明确扩展到残疾人,这一立场应通过医学院的 TS 和提出住宿要求的程序明确传达。为此,学校应考虑通用设计原则,以尽可能广泛地为所有学习者创建政策和评估,而无需事后的住宿。在医学教育中,沿着这些原则进行深思熟虑和协调一致的努力早已是当务之急。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验