Megan Coyer’s chapter engages with periodical print as a vehicle for an improving medical culture in Scotland, concentrating on the second series of the . Coyer demonstrates how the Scottish press often complemented improving civic initiatives like the Edinburgh Lunatic Asylum campaign. She focuses attention on the distinctive national dynamics associated with medical improvement efforts in early nineteenth-century Scotland, with the ‘providing a public forum for the expression of a national medical identity’. This identity, as Coyer shows, had an ideology of improvement at its core. This work recovers the cultural significance of the as ‘the third major player in popular periodical culture in Romantic-era Scotland’; a status overshadowed by the recent critical attention devoted to the second and in Scottish Romantic studies. Coyer also shows how the efforts of public health reformers highlight the complexity of improvement as both a material and moral process. She argues that print efforts dedicated to improving public health represent a ‘discursive strand in the magazine identifying a lack of cleanliness … as a moral and material blight on an otherwise improving Scottish society’. This bringing together of moral and practical aspects of improvement in the also finds expression in the magazine’s series of Scottish medical biographies, whose narratives, Coyer notes, provide ‘ideal exemplars of lives dedicated to a culture of improvement’.
梅根·科耶的章节探讨了期刊印刷作为改善苏格兰医学文化的一种媒介,重点关注《爱丁堡医学与外科杂志》的第二系列。科耶展示了苏格兰媒体如何经常补充诸如爱丁堡疯人院运动等改善公民状况的倡议。她将注意力集中在与19世纪早期苏格兰医学改善努力相关的独特的国家动态上,认为《爱丁堡医学与外科杂志》“为表达一种国家医学身份提供了一个公共论坛”。正如科耶所表明的,这种身份以一种改善的意识形态为核心。这项研究恢复了《爱丁堡医学与外科杂志》作为“浪漫主义时代苏格兰大众期刊文化中的第三个主要参与者”的文化意义;在苏格兰浪漫主义研究中,这一地位因最近对第二系列《爱丁堡评论》和《布莱克伍德杂志》的批判性关注而被掩盖。科耶还展示了公共卫生改革者的努力如何凸显了改善作为一个物质和道德过程的复杂性。她认为,致力于改善公共卫生的印刷工作代表了“该杂志话语中的一个脉络,将缺乏清洁认定为……对原本在进步的苏格兰社会的一种道德和物质上的破坏”。在《爱丁堡医学与外科杂志》中,改善的道德和实际方面的这种结合也体现在该杂志的一系列苏格兰医学传记中,科耶指出,这些传记的叙述提供了“致力于一种进步文化的生活的理想典范”。