• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期疾病患者临终前三个月丧亲家庭成员对护理的满意度

Bereaved Family Members' Satisfaction with Care during the Last Three Months of Life for People with Advanced Illness.

作者信息

O'Sullivan Anna, Alvariza Anette, Öhlen Joakim, Håkanson Cecilia

机构信息

Department of Health Care Sciences, Palliative Research Centre, Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College, P.O. Box 11189, SE-100 61 Stockholm, Sweden.

Capio Palliative Care Unit, Dalen Hospital, Åstorpsringen 6, Enskededalen, SE-121 87 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2018 Nov 6;6(4):130. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6040130.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare6040130
PMID:30404147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6315663/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies evaluating the end-of-life care for longer periods of illness trajectories and in several care places are currently lacking. This study explored bereaved family members' satisfaction with care during the last three months of life for people with advanced illness, and associations between satisfaction with care and characteristics of the deceased individuals and their family members.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey design was used. The sample was 485 family members of individuals who died at four different hospitals in Sweden.

RESULTS

Of the participants, 78.7% rated the overall care as high. For hospice care, 87.1% reported being satisfied, 87% with the hospital care, 72.3% with district/county nurses, 65.4% with nursing homes, 62.1% with specialized home care, and 59.6% with general practitioners (GPs). Family members of deceased persons with cancer were more likely to have a higher satisfaction with the care. A lower satisfaction was more likely if the deceased person had a higher educational attainment and a length of illness before death of one year or longer.

CONCLUSION

The type of care, diagnoses, length of illness, educational attainment, and the relationship between the deceased person and the family member influences the satisfaction with care.

摘要

背景

目前缺乏针对较长病程轨迹以及在多个护理场所的临终关怀的研究。本研究探讨了丧亲家庭成员对晚期疾病患者生命最后三个月护理的满意度,以及护理满意度与逝者及其家庭成员特征之间的关联。

方法

采用横断面调查设计。样本为在瑞典四家不同医院去世的患者的485名家庭成员。

结果

在参与者中,78.7%对整体护理评价较高。对于临终关怀,87.1%表示满意,医院护理为87%,地区/县护士护理为72.3%,养老院护理为65.4%,专业家庭护理为62.1%,全科医生(GP)护理为59.6%。癌症逝者的家庭成员对护理的满意度更高。如果逝者教育程度较高且死前患病时长为一年或更长时间,则满意度较低。

结论

护理类型、诊断、病程长度、教育程度以及逝者与家庭成员之间的关系会影响护理满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d88/6315663/22c94d5ba0bf/healthcare-06-00130-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d88/6315663/22c94d5ba0bf/healthcare-06-00130-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d88/6315663/22c94d5ba0bf/healthcare-06-00130-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Bereaved Family Members' Satisfaction with Care during the Last Three Months of Life for People with Advanced Illness.晚期疾病患者临终前三个月丧亲家庭成员对护理的满意度
Healthcare (Basel). 2018 Nov 6;6(4):130. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6040130.
2
The influence of care place and diagnosis on care communication at the end of life: bereaved family members' perspective.临终关怀场所及诊断对临终关怀沟通的影响:丧亲家庭成员的视角
Palliat Support Care. 2021 Dec;19(6):664-671. doi: 10.1017/S147895152100016X.
3
Adaptation and validation of the VOICES (SF) questionnaire - for evaluation of end-of-life care in Sweden.VOICES(SF)问卷的改编与验证——用于瑞典临终关怀评估
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Sep;32(3):1254-1260. doi: 10.1111/scs.12542. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
4
Place of care and death preferences among recently bereaved family members: a cross-sectional survey.近期丧亲家庭成员的护理地点与死亡偏好:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 19;14(e3):e2904-e2913. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004697.
5
Family Perspectives on Aggressive Cancer Care Near the End of Life.家庭对临终前积极癌症治疗的看法。
JAMA. 2016 Jan 19;315(3):284-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18604.
6
A Nationwide Survey of Quality of End-of-Life Cancer Care in Designated Cancer Centers, Inpatient Palliative Care Units, and Home Hospices in Japan: The J-HOPE Study.日本指定癌症中心、住院姑息治疗病房及居家临终关怀机构中终末期癌症护理质量的全国性调查:J-HOPE研究
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Jul;50(1):38-47.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
7
Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care.家属对临终关怀最后场所的看法。
JAMA. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):88-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.1.88.
8
Home care in the last year of life: family member perceptions of unmet need associated with last place of care.生命终末期的家庭护理:与最后照护场所相关的家庭照护者对未满足需求的认知。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010 Jan;11(1):21-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.07.011. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
9
[Factors related to bereaved family's satisfaction with end-of-life care at geriatric health services facilities].[老年保健服务机构中与丧亲家庭对临终关怀满意度相关的因素]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2020;67(6):390-398. doi: 10.11236/jph.67.6_390.
10
Support received by family members before, at and after an ill person's death.患者去世前、去世时和去世后家属所获得的支持。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jun 24;20(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00800-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of care in the last year of life: adaptation and validation of the German "Views of Informal Carers' Evaluation of Services - Last Year of Life - Cologne".生命终末期的医疗质量:德国“非正式照顾者对服务的看法-生命终末期-科隆”的适应和验证。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 28;22(1):1433. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08700-0.
2
Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey.通过建立实用的基于证据的计划-执行-研究-行动循环来改善生命终末期的区域护理:一项横断面调查的结果。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 24;10(11):e035988. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035988.

本文引用的文献

1
Adaptation and validation of the VOICES (SF) questionnaire - for evaluation of end-of-life care in Sweden.VOICES(SF)问卷的改编与验证——用于瑞典临终关怀评估
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Sep;32(3):1254-1260. doi: 10.1111/scs.12542. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
2
Measuring the quality of end-of-life care: Development, testing, and cultural validation of the Danish version of Views of Informal Carers' Evaluation of Services-Short Form.测量终末期关怀的质量:丹麦版非正式照护者服务评价观点-简短形式的开发、测试和文化验证。
Palliat Med. 2018 Apr;32(4):804-814. doi: 10.1177/0269216317740274. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
3
Relatives' perceived quality of palliative care: comparisons between care settings in which patients die.
临终关怀的亲属感知质量:不同临终关怀环境的比较。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Aug 16;16(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0224-x.
4
Family Satisfaction With End-of-Life Care in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review of the Literature.家庭对重症监护病房临终关怀的满意度:文献系统综述
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017 Sep/Oct;36(5):278-283. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000262.
5
Barriers to palliative care in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in home care: A qualitative study of the perspective of professional caregivers.居家慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者姑息治疗的障碍:专业护理人员视角的定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(3-4):650-660. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13973. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
6
Palliative care during the final week of life of older people in nursing homes: A register-based study.养老院老年人生命最后一周的姑息治疗:一项基于登记册的研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2017 Aug;15(4):417-424. doi: 10.1017/S1478951516000948. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
7
Estimating the need for palliative care at the population level: A cross-national study in 12 countries.在人群层面评估姑息治疗需求:一项在12个国家开展的跨国研究。
Palliat Med. 2017 Jun;31(6):526-536. doi: 10.1177/0269216316671280. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
A retrospective population based cohort study of access to specialist palliative care in the last year of life: who is still missing out a decade on?一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究:关于生命最后一年获得专科姑息治疗的情况——十年过去了,谁仍未得到治疗?
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 May 10;15:46. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0119-2.
9
Discussing end-of-life issues in nursing homes: a nationwide study in France.法国养老院临终问题探讨:一项全国性研究
Age Ageing. 2016 May;45(3):395-402. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw046. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
10
End-of-life care in residential care homes: a retrospective study of the perspectives of family members using the VOICES questionnaire.养老院中的临终关怀:一项使用VOICES问卷对家庭成员观点的回顾性研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2017 Mar;31(1):72-84. doi: 10.1111/scs.12317. Epub 2016 Mar 14.