Miyashita Mitsunori, Morita Tatsuya, Sato Kazuki, Tsuneto Satoru, Shima Yasuo
Department of Adult Nursing/Palliative Care Nursing, School of Health Sciences and Nursing Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan; Division of Palliative Nursing, Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Palliative Care Team and Seirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatahara Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Jul;50(1):38-47.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
End-of-life (EOL) cancer care in general hospitals and home care has not previously been evaluated in Japan.
This study aimed to evaluate EOL cancer care from the perspective of bereaved family members in nationwide designated cancer centers, inpatient palliative care units (PCUs), and home hospices in Japan.
We conducted a cross-sectional, anonymous, self-report questionnaire survey for bereaved family members of cancer patients in March 2008 for 56 designated cancer centers and in June 2007 for 100 PCUs and 14 home hospices. Outcomes were overall care satisfaction, structure and process of care (Care Evaluation Scale), and achievement of a good death (Good Death Inventory).
In designated cancer centers, PCUs, and home hospices, 2794 (response rate 59%), 5312 (response rate 69%), and 292 (response rate 67%) bereaved family members participated, respectively. Mean scores for overall care satisfaction were high for all places of death, at 4.3 ± 1.2 for designated cancer centers, 5.0 ± 1.2 for PCUs, and 5.0 ± 1.0 for home hospices. Designated cancer centers showed significantly lower ratings than PCUs and home hospices for structure and process of care and achievement of a good death (P = 0.0001 each). Home hospices were rated significantly higher than PCUs for achievement of a good death (P = 0.0001).
The main findings of this study were: (1) overall, bereaved family members were satisfied with end-of-life care in all three places of death; (2) designated cancer centers were inferior to PCUs and home hospices and had more room for improvement; and 3) home hospices were rated higher than PCUs for achieving a good death, although home hospices remain uncommon in Japan.
日本此前尚未对综合医院和家庭护理中的临终癌症护理进行评估。
本研究旨在从日本全国指定癌症中心、住院姑息治疗病房(PCU)和家庭临终关怀机构中失去亲人的家庭成员的角度评估临终癌症护理。
我们于2008年3月对56个指定癌症中心的癌症患者遗属进行了横断面、匿名、自填式问卷调查,并于2007年6月对100个PCU和14个家庭临终关怀机构进行了调查。结果指标包括总体护理满意度、护理结构和过程(护理评估量表)以及善终达成情况(善终量表)。
在指定癌症中心、PCU和家庭临终关怀机构中,分别有2794名(回复率59%)、5312名(回复率69%)和292名(回复率67%)失去亲人的家庭成员参与。所有死亡地点的总体护理满意度平均分都很高,指定癌症中心为4.3±1.2,PCU为5.0±1.2,家庭临终关怀机构为5.0±1.0。在护理结构和过程以及善终达成情况方面,指定癌症中心的评分显著低于PCU和家庭临终关怀机构(均P = 0.0001)。在善终达成情况方面,家庭临终关怀机构的评分显著高于PCU(P = 0.0001)。
本研究的主要发现为:(1)总体而言,失去亲人的家庭成员对所有三个死亡地点的临终护理感到满意;(2)指定癌症中心不如PCU和家庭临终关怀机构,有更大的改进空间;(3)尽管家庭临终关怀机构在日本仍不常见,但在善终达成情况方面的评分高于PCU。