Suppr超能文献

高强度机器人辅助手部训练对多发性硬化症患者上肢恢复及肌肉活动的影响:一项随机、对照、单盲试验

Effects of High-intensity Robot-assisted Hand Training on Upper Limb Recovery and Muscle Activity in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blinded Trial.

作者信息

Gandolfi Marialuisa, Valè Nicola, Dimitrova Eleonora Kirilova, Mazzoleni Stefano, Battini Elena, Benedetti Maria Donata, Gajofatto Alberto, Ferraro Francesco, Castelli Matteo, Camin Maruo, Filippetti Mirko, De Paoli Carola, Chemello Elena, Picelli Alessandro, Corradi Jessica, Waldner Andreas, Saltuari Leopold, Smania Nicola

机构信息

Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant' Anna, Polo Sant' Anna Valdera, Pontedera, Italy.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2018 Oct 24;9:905. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00905. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Integration of robotics and upper limb rehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) has rarely been investigated. To compare the effects of robot-assisted hand training against non-robotic hand training on upper limb activity in PwMS. To compare the training effects on hand dexterity, muscle activity, and upper limb dysfunction as measured with the International Classification of Functioning. This single-blind, randomized, controlled trial involved 44 PwMS (Expanded Disability Status Scale:1.5-8) and hand dexterity deficits. The experimental group ( = 23) received robot-assisted hand training; the control group ( = 21) received non-robotic hand training. Training protocols lasted for 5 weeks (50 min/session, 2 sessions/week). Before (T0), after (T1), and at 1 month follow-up (T2), a blinded rater evaluated patients using a comprehensive test battery. Primary outcome: Action Research Arm Test. Secondary outcomes: Nine Holes Peg Test; Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale-upper extremity section; Motricity Index; Motor Activity Log; Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Quality of Life-54; Life Habits assessment-general short form and surface electromyography. There were no significant between-group differences in primary and secondary outcomes. Electromyography showed relevant changes providing evidence increased activity in the extensor carpi at T1 and T2. The training effects on upper limb activity and function were comparable between the two groups. However, robot-assisted training demonstrated remarkable effects on upper limb use and muscle activity. https://clinicaltrials.gov NCT03561155.

摘要

机器人技术与多发性硬化症患者(PwMS)上肢康复的整合鲜有研究。比较机器人辅助手部训练与非机器人手部训练对PwMS上肢活动的影响。比较训练对用国际功能分类法测量的手部灵活性、肌肉活动和上肢功能障碍的影响。这项单盲、随机、对照试验纳入了44例PwMS患者(扩展残疾状态量表:1.5 - 8)且存在手部灵活性缺陷。实验组(n = 23)接受机器人辅助手部训练;对照组(n = 21)接受非机器人手部训练。训练方案持续5周(每次50分钟,每周2次)。在训练前(T0)、训练后(T1)以及1个月随访时(T2),由一位盲法评估者使用综合测试组对患者进行评估。主要结局指标:动作研究臂测试。次要结局指标:九孔插板测试;Fugl - Meyer评估量表上肢部分;运动指数;运动活动日志;多发性硬化症(MS)生活质量量表 - 54项;生活习惯评估 - 一般简表以及表面肌电图。在主要和次要结局指标方面,两组之间无显著差异。肌电图显示了相关变化,证明在T1和T2时腕伸肌的活动增加。两组在上肢活动和功能方面的训练效果相当。然而,机器人辅助训练在上肢使用和肌肉活动方面显示出显著效果。https://clinicaltrials.gov NCT03561155

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d124/6207593/eb8ff52f1892/fneur-09-00905-g0001.jpg

相似文献

9
Robot-Assisted Training as Self-Training for Upper-Limb Hemiplegia in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Stroke. 2022 Jul;53(7):2182-2191. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037260. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
10
Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Feb;88(2):142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.032.

引用本文的文献

4
Overview of the role of robots in upper limb disabilities rehabilitation: a scoping review.
Arch Public Health. 2023 May 8;81(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01100-8.
6
THE EFFECTS OF EXERCISE TRAINING ON UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION FOR PERSONS WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.
J Rehabil Med Clin Commun. 2022 Sep 29;5:2306. doi: 10.2340/jrmcc.v5.2306. eCollection 2022.
8
What the Tech? The Management of Neurological Dysfunction Through the Use of Digital Technology.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1317:131-145. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-61125-5_7.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of Life Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis: Different Perception between Patients and Neurologists.
Front Neurol. 2018 Jan 11;8:729. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00729. eCollection 2017.
2
3
The Nine-Hole Peg Test as a manual dexterity performance measure for multiple sclerosis.
Mult Scler. 2017 Apr;23(5):711-720. doi: 10.1177/1352458517690824. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
4
Upper Limb Rehabilitation in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Sep;30(8):773-93. doi: 10.1177/1545968315624785. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
5
Analysis of upper limb movement in Multiple Sclerosis subjects during common daily actions.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:6967-70. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319995.
8
How Do Fugl-Meyer Arm Motor Scores Relate to Dexterity According to the Action Research Arm Test at 6 Months Poststroke?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Oct;96(10):1845-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
9
Home-based training to improve manual dexterity in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial.
Mult Scler. 2015 Oct;21(12):1546-56. doi: 10.1177/1352458514565959. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
10
Upper limb assessment in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of outcome measures and their psychometric properties.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jun;95(6):1184-200. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.02.023. Epub 2014 Mar 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验