Li Yebei, Tao Hongbin, Zhang Bingchao, Huang Shoubing, Wang Pu
College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Oct 22;9:1326. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01326. eCollection 2018.
The kernel setting of maize varies greatly because of the timing and intensity of water deficits. This variation can limit leaf productivity (source), the translocation of assimilated sugars (flow), and yield formation (sink). To explain the decline in kernel setting of maize under water deficits from the perspective of source-flow-sink, a 3-year experiment was conducted under a rain shelter. Five water regimes were studied. One regime included well-irrigated (CK) treatment. Four regimes involved water deficits: irrigation was withheld during the 6- to 8-leaf stage (V), the 9- to 12-leaf stage (V), the 13-leaf stage to tasseling stage (V), and the silking stage to blister stage (R). Water deficit effects on kernel setting began when the water deficit occurred at V and became more significant with time. Kernel weight was reduced by 12 and 11% when there were water deficits during V and V, respectively. This was the result of reduced leaf area (limited source) and an altered vascular bundle in the ear peduncles (limited assimilate flow). The reduced vascular bundle number, rather than the ear peduncle cross-sectional area, significantly affected the final kernel weight when exposed to a water deficit prior to the silking stage. The water deficits prior to and close to the flowering stage significantly reduced ear kernel number; that is, 14 and 19% less during V and R, respectively, compared with the kernel number during the CK treatment. This reflects a smaller sink under water deficit conditions. Additionally, ovary size was reduced the most in the V water deficit compared with other treatments. After rewatering, the water deficit before or during flowering stage continued to have residual effects on grain-filling in the late growth period. The grain-filling rate decreased under the V water deficit; the grain-filling duration shortened under the R water deficit; and both negative effects occurred under the V water deficit. This study clearly indicated that (1) the water deficit during the vegetative organ rapid growth period both limited leaf source development and assimilate flow and slowed down kernel development, and (2) the water deficit just before and during flowering reduced kernel sink. Deficits at both times could retard grain-filling and reduce maize yield. The results of the present study might guide irrigation practices in irrigated maize or inform the management of sowing time in rainfed maize, to desynchronize the water deficit and the plant's reactions to such deficits at different stages.
由于水分亏缺的时间和强度不同,玉米的籽粒结实情况差异很大。这种差异会限制叶片生产力(源)、同化糖分的转运(流)以及产量形成(库)。为了从源 - 流 - 库的角度解释水分亏缺条件下玉米籽粒结实率下降的原因,在防雨棚下进行了为期3年的试验。研究了五种水分处理方式。一种处理方式包括充分灌溉(CK)处理。另外四种处理方式涉及水分亏缺:在6 - 8叶期(V6 - 8)、9 - 12叶期(V9 - 12)、13叶期至抽雄期(V13 - T)以及吐丝期至乳熟期(R)停止灌溉。当在V6 - 8、V9 - 12、V13 - T和R期出现水分亏缺时,对籽粒结实的影响随即开始,且随着时间推移愈发显著。在V6 - 8和V9 - 12期出现水分亏缺时,粒重分别降低了12%和11%。这是叶面积减小(源受限)以及穗柄维管束改变(同化物流受限)的结果。在吐丝期之前遭受水分亏缺时,维管束数量减少而非穗柄横截面积减小对最终粒重有显著影响。在开花期之前及临近开花期的水分亏缺显著减少了穗粒数;也就是说,与CK处理相比,V6 - 8和R期的穗粒数分别减少了14%和19%。这反映了水分亏缺条件下库变小。此外,与其他处理相比,V6 - 8水分亏缺处理下子房大小减小最为明显。复水后,开花期之前或开花期的水分亏缺对生育后期的籽粒灌浆仍有残留影响。V6 - 8水分亏缺处理下灌浆速率降低;R水分亏缺处理下灌浆持续时间缩短;而V13 - T水分亏缺处理下两种负面影响都有。本研究清楚地表明:(1)营养器官快速生长期的水分亏缺既限制了叶片源的发育和同化物流,又减缓了籽粒发育;(2)开花期之前及开花期的水分亏缺减少了籽粒库。这两个时期的亏缺都会延缓籽粒灌浆并降低玉米产量。本研究结果可能为灌溉玉米的灌溉实践提供指导,或为雨养玉米的播种时间管理提供参考,以使水分亏缺与植株在不同阶段对这种亏缺的反应不同步。