Food Engineering Department , Ordu University , Ordu 52200 , Turkey.
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Nov 28;66(47):12580-12593. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03469. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
Although in vitro studies to identify interactions between food components and the colonic microbiota employ distinct methods to mimic upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract digestion, the effects of differences in protocols on fermentation have not been rigorously addressed. Here, we compared two widely used upper GI tract digestion methods on four different cereal brans in fermentations by fecal microbiota to test the hypotheses that (1) different methods are varyingly efficient in removing accessible starches and proteins from dietary components and (2) these result in cereal-specific differences in fermentation by fecal microbiota. Our results supported both hypotheses, in that the methods differed significantly in bran starch and protein retention and that the effects were cereal-specific. Furthermore, these differences impacted fermentation by the fecal microbiota of healthy donors, altering both short-chain fatty acid production and microbial community composition. These data suggest that digestion methods should be standardized across laboratories for in vitro fiber fermentation studies.
尽管体外研究采用不同的方法来模拟上消化道(GI)消化,以鉴定食物成分与结肠微生物群之间的相互作用,但尚未严格解决方案差异对发酵的影响。在这里,我们比较了两种广泛使用的上消化道消化方法在四种不同谷物麸皮发酵中的效果,以验证以下两个假设:(1)不同的方法从饮食成分中去除可利用的淀粉和蛋白质的效率不同;(2)这会导致粪便微生物群发酵的谷物特异性差异。我们的结果支持了这两个假设,因为方法在麸皮淀粉和蛋白质保留方面存在显著差异,并且这种差异具有谷物特异性。此外,这些差异影响了健康供体粪便微生物群的发酵,改变了短链脂肪酸的产生和微生物群落组成。这些数据表明,在体外纤维发酵研究中,应在实验室之间标准化消化方法。