• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在成人保护服务样本中对筛查量表进行交叉验证。

Cross-validation of the screening scale in an adult protective services sample.

机构信息

a Institute of Gerontology and Department of Psychology , Wayne State University , Detroit , MI , USA.

b Institute of Gerontology , Wayne State University , Detroit , MI , USA.

出版信息

J Elder Abuse Negl. 2019 Jan-Feb;31(1):25-37. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2018.1531098. Epub 2018 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1080/08946566.2018.1531098
PMID:30406729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6424609/
Abstract

Adult Protective Services (APS) professionals are often called on to assess decision-making capacity when investigating financial exploitation. Previous research found that in consecutive APS cases, a decision-making screening scale (LFDSS) also detected financial exploitation. The purpose of this study was to apply the clinical cutoff scores derived from the previous study to a new sample of APS cases. Using a sample of 105 participants, from APS workers across 5 counties this study investigated the clinical utility of the LFDSS to detect financial exploitation based on ratings by APS professionals using the scale. Results demonstrate that the LFDSS has excellent internal consistency and clinical utility properties. This paper provides support for use of the LFDSS as a reliable and valid instrument. Instructions for use of the LFDSS are included in the article, along with information about online support tools.

摘要

成人保护服务(APS)专业人员在调查金融剥削时,经常被要求评估决策能力。先前的研究发现,在连续的 APS 案例中,决策筛选量表(LFDSS)也能检测到金融剥削。本研究的目的是将先前研究中得出的临床临界分数应用于 APS 案例的新样本。本研究使用来自 5 个县的 APS 工作人员的 105 名参与者样本,调查了 LFDSS 根据 APS 专业人员使用该量表的评分来检测金融剥削的临床实用性。结果表明,LFDSS 具有极好的内部一致性和临床实用性。本文为使用 LFDSS 作为可靠和有效的工具提供了支持。文章中包含了 LFDSS 的使用说明,以及有关在线支持工具的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b54/6424609/5b3ceabb31a9/nihms-1520355-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b54/6424609/5b3ceabb31a9/nihms-1520355-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b54/6424609/5b3ceabb31a9/nihms-1520355-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cross-validation of the screening scale in an adult protective services sample.在成人保护服务样本中对筛查量表进行交叉验证。
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2019 Jan-Feb;31(1):25-37. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2018.1531098. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
2
Reliability and Validity of the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale.利希滕贝格财务决策筛选量表的信度和效度
Innov Aging. 2017 Mar 1;1(1). doi: 10.1093/geroni/igx003. Epub 2017 Mar 26.
3
The Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale (LFDSS): A new tool for assessing financial decision making and preventing financial exploitation.利希滕贝格金融决策筛选量表(LFDSS):一种评估金融决策和预防金融剥削的新工具。
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2016 Jun-Jul;28(3):134-51. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2016.1168333. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
4
Item response theory analysis of the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale.利希滕贝格财务决策筛选量表的项目反应理论分析
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2017 Aug-Oct;29(4):213-228. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2017.1338170. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
5
Quantifying Risk of Financial Incapacity and Financial Exploitation in Community-dwelling Older Adults: Utility of a Scoring System for the Lichtenberg Financial Decision-making Rating Scale.量化社区居住老年人的财务能力丧失和财务剥削风险:利希滕贝格财务决策评分量表评分系统的效用。
Clin Gerontol. 2020 May-Jun;43(3):266-280. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2018.1485812. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
6
Assessing elder mistreatment: instrument development and implications for adult protective services.评估老年人虐待:工具开发及其对成人保护服务的影响。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2009 Nov;52(8):815-36. doi: 10.1080/01634370902918597.
7
Implementation of financial decision making scales into statewide APS practice: the Michigan experience.将财务决策量表应用于全州 APS 实践:密歇根州的经验。
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2021 Jan-Feb;33(1):33-46. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2020.1864697. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
8
A Novel Intervention to Identify and Report Suspected Abuse in Older, Primary Care Patients.一种识别和报告老年初级保健患者疑似虐待的新干预措施。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1748-1754. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16433. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
9
A Short Form of the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale.利希滕贝格财务决策评分量表的简式版。
Clin Gerontol. 2020 May-Jun;43(3):256-265. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2018.1527424. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
10
Risk factors associated with elder abuse: the importance of differentiating by type of elder maltreatment.与虐待老年人相关的风险因素:区分虐待老年人类型的重要性。
Violence Vict. 2011;26(6):738-57. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.26.6.738.

引用本文的文献

1
The WALLET Study: Examining Early Memory Loss and Personal Finance.WALLET研究:探究早期记忆丧失与个人财务状况
Innov Aging. 2022 May 26;6(5):igac038. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac038. eCollection 2022.
2
Which Items of the Financial Decision Tracker Differentiate Those with Decision-making Deficits from Those with No Deficits? Data from the Michigan APS Implementation Project.财务决策追踪器的哪些项目能够区分有决策缺陷的人和没有缺陷的人?密歇根 APS 实施项目的数据。
Clin Gerontol. 2021 Oct-Dec;44(5):577-584. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2021.1901167. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
3
Implementation of financial decision making scales into statewide APS practice: the Michigan experience.将财务决策量表应用于全州 APS 实践:密歇根州的经验。
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2021 Jan-Feb;33(1):33-46. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2020.1864697. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
4
Context Matters: Financial, Psychological, and Relationship Insecurity Around Personal Finance Is Associated With Financial Exploitation.情境很重要:个人金融方面的财务、心理和关系不安全感与金融剥削有关。
Gerontologist. 2020 Aug 14;60(6):1040-1049. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa020.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale.利希滕贝格财务决策筛选量表的信度和效度
Innov Aging. 2017 Mar 1;1(1). doi: 10.1093/geroni/igx003. Epub 2017 Mar 26.
2
Item response theory analysis of the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale.利希滕贝格财务决策筛选量表的项目反应理论分析
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2017 Aug-Oct;29(4):213-228. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2017.1338170. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
3
Conceptual Models and Guidelines for Clinical Assessment of Financial Capacity.财务能力临床评估的概念模型与指南
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 Sep;31(6):541-53. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acw052. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
4
The Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale (LFDSS): A new tool for assessing financial decision making and preventing financial exploitation.利希滕贝格金融决策筛选量表(LFDSS):一种评估金融决策和预防金融剥削的新工具。
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2016 Jun-Jul;28(3):134-51. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2016.1168333. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
5
Incidence of Dementia over Three Decades in the Framingham Heart Study.弗雷明汉心脏研究中三个十年间痴呆症的发病率。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 11;374(6):523-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504327.
6
A Person-Centered Approach to Financial Capacity Assessment: Preliminary Development of a New Rating Scale.一种以个人为中心的财务能力评估方法:一种新评级量表的初步开发。
Clin Gerontol. 2015 Jan 1;38(1):49-67. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2014.970318.
7
Dementia Risk and Financial Decision Making by Older Households: The Impact of Information.老年家庭的痴呆风险与财务决策:信息的影响
J Hum Cap. 2013 Apr 1;2013:45. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2339225.
8
Cognitive decline impairs financial and health literacy among community-based older persons without dementia.认知能力下降会损害无痴呆的社区老年人的金融和健康素养。
Psychol Aging. 2013 Sep;28(3):614-24. doi: 10.1037/a0033103. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
9
Poor decision making is a consequence of cognitive decline among older persons without Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment.认知能力下降是阿尔茨海默病或轻度认知障碍老年人决策能力下降的后果。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043647. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
10
The impact of health and financial literacy on decision making in community-based older adults.社区老年人健康与金融知识对决策的影响。
Gerontology. 2012;58(6):531-9. doi: 10.1159/000339094. Epub 2012 Jun 22.