Suppr超能文献

作为可靠死亡标志的不可逆性脑功能丧失的相关性。

The Relevance of Irreversible Loss of Brain Function as a Reliable Sign of Death.

机构信息

*on behalf of the working group "The relevance of irreversible loss of brain function as a reliable sign of death" of the Scientific Advisory Board within the German Medical Association; for a detailed list of collaborators see Box 3 at the end of this article; Department of Neurology With Experimental Neurology, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich.

*on behalf of the working group "The relevance of irreversible loss of brain function as a reliable sign of death" of the Scientific Advisory Board within the German Medical Association; for a detailed list of collaborators see Box 3 at the end of this article; Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich.

出版信息

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Oct 12;115(41):675-681. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0675.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing need for clear explanation of the diagnostic entity called "irreversible loss of brain function" (ILBF), as the absolute reliability of this diagnosis and its significance continue to be widely misunderstood. The determination of death as an objective medical-scientific matter is often not clearly distinguished from various other aspects of death, such as its metaphysical and cultural aspects and the ways in which the living deal with the dead.

METHODS

This review is based on articles retrieved by a selective literature search in the PubMed database and on guidelines and standardized diagnostic protocols from Germany and abroad.

RESULTS

ILBF can be caused by brain ischemia or anoxia or by any other type of brain disease or injury leading to an elevation of the intracranial pressure above the blood pressure and thereby to an arrest of the cerebral circulation. All situations in which brain function is merely reduced but not abolished, or only temporarily but not permanently abolished, can be clearly differentiated from ILBF through the use of standard diagnostic procedures as recommended in the relevant guidelines. Biological features that are common to all human beings underlie the medical criteria for the determination of death. The most important elements of the determination of death are irreversibility of the loss of brain function, loss of integration of bodily functions into a single living being, and loss of ability for any self-reflection or any independent interaction with the environment.

CONCLUSION

ILBF is a reliable sign that a human being is dead. There has never been even one known case of incorrect determination of ILBF after proper application of the standardized diagnostic procedures that are set down in the guideline according to §16 of the German Transplantation Law.

摘要

背景

需要清楚解释被称为“不可逆转的脑功能丧失”(ILBF)的诊断实体,因为该诊断的绝对可靠性及其意义仍被广泛误解。作为客观的医学科学问题的死亡的确定通常与死亡的其他方面(如形而上学和文化方面以及生者处理死者的方式)没有明确区分。

方法

本综述基于在 PubMed 数据库中进行的选择性文献搜索以及德国和国外的指南和标准化诊断方案中检索到的文章。

结果

ILBF 可由脑缺血或缺氧或任何其他类型的脑疾病或损伤引起,导致颅内压升高超过血压,从而导致脑循环停止。通过使用相关指南中推荐的标准诊断程序,可以清楚地区分所有脑功能仅是降低但未完全丧失,或仅是暂时丧失但未永久丧失的情况与 ILBF。所有人类共有的生物学特征是确定死亡的医学标准的基础。确定死亡的最重要要素是脑功能丧失的不可逆性、身体功能整体丧失和自我反思或与环境独立交互的能力丧失。

结论

ILBF 是人类死亡的可靠标志。根据德国移植法第 16 条规定的指南中规定的标准化诊断程序正确应用后,从未出现过一次不正确确定 ILBF 的情况。

相似文献

10
[Brain death criterion and organ donation: current neuroscientific perspective].[脑死亡标准与器官捐献:当前神经科学视角]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020 Dec;63(12):1519-1530. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03245-1. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

2
[Legal report].[法律报告]
Rechtsmedizin (Berl). 2022;32(4):299-307. doi: 10.1007/s00194-021-00540-2. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
3
Brain beats heart: a cross-cultural reflection.脑比心强:跨文化的反思。
Brain. 2021 Jul 28;144(6):1617-1620. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab080.
4
[Brain death criterion and organ donation: current neuroscientific perspective].[脑死亡标准与器官捐献:当前神经科学视角]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020 Dec;63(12):1519-1530. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03245-1. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
6
In Reply.作为回复。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Feb 8;116(6):99. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0099.
7
Pertinent Points Need to Be More Convincingly Stated.相关要点需要更有说服力地阐述。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Feb 8;116(6):98. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0098b.
9
Metaphysical and Cultural Aspects.形而上学与文化层面
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Feb 8;116(6):97. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0097b.
10
Spiritual Issues Should Be Considered.应考虑精神层面的问题。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Feb 8;116(6):97. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0097a.

本文引用的文献

2
Self-organization of the in vitro attached human embryo.体外附着人类胚胎的自组织。
Nature. 2016 May 12;533(7602):251-4. doi: 10.1038/nature17948. Epub 2016 May 4.
3
Brain death declaration: Practices and perceptions worldwide.脑死亡判定:全球范围内的实践与认知
Neurology. 2015 May 5;84(18):1870-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001540. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
5
History of brain death as death: 1968 to the present.脑死亡作为死亡判定标准的历史:1968年至今。
J Crit Care. 2014 Aug;29(4):673-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
7
Hypothalamic-Pituitary Function in Brain Death: A Review.脑死亡中的下丘脑 - 垂体功能:综述
J Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):41-50. doi: 10.1177/0885066614527410. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
8
Practice variability in brain death determination: a call to action.脑死亡判定中的实践变异性:行动呼吁。
Neurology. 2013 Dec 3;81(23):2009-14. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000436938.70528.4a. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
10
Brain death: time for an international consensus.脑死亡:达成国际共识的时刻。
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;108 Suppl 1:i6-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer355.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验