Clinical Assessment, Pearson.
Psychol Serv. 2019 May;16(2):213-220. doi: 10.1037/ser0000295. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
The adaptation of individually administered psychological tests from paper to app-based administration formats can present unique threats to the construct and raw-score equivalence of the paper and digital formats. We discuss these potential threats and describe a study evaluating the equivalence of paper and digital versions of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, fifth edition (WISC-V), which has been adapted to an app-based testing platform called Q-interactive. The present study (N = 350) used an equivalent-groups design to assess the raw-score equivalence of 18 WISC-V subtests that were designed with the intent of minimizing format effect. Effect sizes in standard deviation units were small, ranging from -0.20 to 0.20 (mean absolute value = 0.09), and format effects were unrelated to ability level, age, sex, or parent education. These results suggest that when tests are designed or adapted with digital-paper equivalence as a goal, digital-paper raw-score equivalence can be achieved across a variety of construct domains. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
从纸质版到基于应用程序的管理格式的个体管理心理测试的改编可能会对纸质版和数字格式的结构和原始分数等效性产生独特的威胁。我们讨论了这些潜在的威胁,并描述了一项评估韦氏儿童智力量表第五版(WISC-V)的纸质版和数字版等效性的研究,该研究已被改编为名为 Q-interactive 的基于应用程序的测试平台。本研究(N=350)采用等效组设计来评估 18 项 WISC-V 子测验的原始分数等效性,这些子测验的设计意图是最小化格式效应。标准差单位的效应大小较小,范围为-0.20 至 0.20(平均绝对值=0.09),并且格式效应与能力水平、年龄、性别或父母教育无关。这些结果表明,当测试的设计或改编以数字-纸质等效性为目标时,可以在各种结构领域实现数字-纸质原始分数等效性。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。