Suppr超能文献

脊髓刺激治疗疼痛的机制:50 年后仍未明。

Mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of pain: Still in the dark after 50 years.

机构信息

Sobell Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Pain. 2019 Apr;23(4):652-659. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1336. Epub 2018 Dec 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Despite the value of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in treating some patients with focal neuropathic pain, technological advances in stimulator design and treatment protocols have not correlated with significant improvements in clinical outcomes. This may be because incomplete understanding of the mechanisms underlying SCS precludes improvement in clinical efficacy. In this brief review, we (a) review phenomenological effects of SCS, (b) review the literature on proposed spinal sites of action of SCS and (c) propose a novel hypothesis of mechanism of action.

RESULTS

Dorsal columns, dorsal roots and dorsal horns have each been proposed as spinal sites of action of SCS. We suggest that evidence in favour of the dorsal columns or dorsal roots as the primary mediators of SCS is weak and propose that the dorsal horn is the crucial site of action. Furthermore, we hypothesize that, based on their location, and neurochemical and morphological properties, dorsal horn islet cells may mediate the effects of SCS.

CONCLUSIONS

The precise spinal mechanisms of action of SCS are still unknown. Dorsal horn islet cells have properties that position them to play a key role in analgesic effects of electrical stimulation. Understanding the mechanisms responsible for positive SCS effects are needed for successful translation into clinical dividends.

SIGNIFICANCE

We review possible spinal mechanisms of action of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain, proposing that direct modulation of dorsal horn neurons is crucial. We suggest that mechanistic insights are needed for translation into more favourable clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景与目的

尽管脊髓刺激(SCS)在治疗某些局灶性神经性疼痛患者方面具有价值,但刺激器设计和治疗方案的技术进步并未与临床结果的显著改善相关。这可能是因为对 SCS 潜在机制的理解不完整,从而无法提高临床疗效。在这篇简短的综述中,我们(a)回顾 SCS 的现象学效应,(b)综述 SCS 拟议的脊髓作用部位的文献,以及(c)提出一种新的作用机制假说。

结果

背柱、背根和背角均被提议为 SCS 的脊髓作用部位。我们认为支持 SCS 的主要介导者为背柱或背根的证据薄弱,并提出背角是关键作用部位。此外,我们假设,基于其位置、神经化学和形态学特性,背角胰岛细胞可能介导 SCS 的作用。

结论

SCS 的精确脊髓作用机制仍不清楚。背角胰岛细胞具有使其在电刺激镇痛作用中发挥关键作用的特性。了解导致 SCS 积极效果的机制对于成功转化为临床红利是必要的。

意义

我们综述了脊髓刺激治疗神经性疼痛的可能脊髓作用机制,提出直接调制背角神经元是至关重要的。我们建议需要深入了解机制,以实现更有利的临床结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验