1 Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
2 Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Feb;33(2):262-276. doi: 10.1177/0269215518809791. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
: To compare five-year outcomes and changes over time of a client-centred activities of daily living (ADL) intervention versus usual ADL interventions for people with stroke and their significant others.
: Five-year follow-up of a cluster-randomized controlled trial where a client-centred ADL intervention ( n = 129) or usual ADL interventions ( n = 151) were delivered to people with stroke.
: Multicentre study including 16 inpatient or home-based rehabilitation units.
: People with stroke and significant others.
: The client-centred ADL intervention aimed at enabling agency in daily activities and participation in everyday life and at reducing caregiver burden.
: For people with stroke, perceived participation (Stroke Impact Scale), independence in ADL, life satisfaction, and use of formal/informal care were measured. For significant others, caregiver burden, life satisfaction, and mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) were assessed.
: Five years post-intervention, data were collected from 145 people with stroke (intervention group: n = 71/control group: n = 74) and 75 significant others (intervention group: n = 36/control group: n = 39). For those with stroke, the Participation domain of the Stroke Impact Scale showed no group differences at year five (68.9 vs 75.4, P = 0.062) or in changes over time. At year five, the control group had better outcomes regarding Other help/supervision. Significant others in the control group were more likely to show signs of depression at year five (odds ratio = 22.3; P < 0.001).
: The client-centred ADL intervention appears to render similar long-term effects as usual ADL interventions for people with stroke, but for significant others signs of depression might be reduced.
比较以患者为中心的日常生活活动(ADL)干预与常规 ADL 干预对脑卒中患者及其主要照顾者的五年结局和随时间变化。
对一项以患者为中心的 ADL 干预(n=129)与常规 ADL 干预(n=151)分别用于脑卒中患者的集群随机对照试验进行五年随访。
包括 16 个住院或家庭为基础的康复单位的多中心研究。
脑卒中患者及其主要照顾者。
以患者为中心的 ADL 干预旨在使患者能够在日常生活中自主活动和参与,并减轻照顾者的负担。
对于脑卒中患者,测量其感知参与(脑卒中影响量表)、ADL 独立性、生活满意度和正式/非正式护理的使用情况。对于主要照顾者,评估照顾者负担、生活满意度和情绪(医院焦虑和抑郁量表)。
干预五年后,从 145 名脑卒中患者(干预组:n=71/对照组:n=74)和 75 名主要照顾者(干预组:n=36/对照组:n=39)中收集了数据。对于脑卒中患者,脑卒中影响量表的参与领域在五年时没有组间差异(68.9 与 75.4,P=0.062)或随时间的变化。在五年时,对照组在其他帮助/监督方面的结果更好。对照组的主要照顾者在五年时更有可能出现抑郁迹象(优势比=22.3;P<0.001)。
以患者为中心的 ADL 干预似乎对脑卒中患者产生与常规 ADL 干预相似的长期效果,但对主要照顾者而言,抑郁迹象可能会减少。