Jacobsson Lars, Lexell Jan
Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sunderby Hospital, Luleå, Sweden.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jan 15;14:10. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0405-y.
An optimal life satisfaction (LS) is considered an important long-term outcome after a traumatic brain injury (TBI). It is, however, not clear to what extent a single instrument captures all aspects of LS, and different instruments may be needed to comprehensively describe LS. The aim of this study was to compare self-ratings of life satisfaction after a TBI with two commonly used instruments.
Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LiSat-11), comprising eleven items and Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), comprising five items, were administered to 67 individuals (51 men and 16 women). Secondary analysis of data collected as part of a survey of individuals with TBI 6 to 15 years post TBI.
Item 1 in LiSat-11 ('Life as a whole') and the total SWLS score was strongly correlated (Spearman's rho = 0.66; p < 0.001). The total score in SWLS had the strongest correlation with items in LiSat-11. All items in LiSat-11, except 'Family life' and 'Partner relationship', were moderately to strongly correlated with items in SWLS. The item 'Partner relationship' in LiSat-11 did not correlate with any of the items in SWLS or the total score. The item 'If I could live my life over, I would change nothing' in SWLS had the weakest correlations with items in LiSat-11. Items 'Vocation' and 'Leisure' in LISat-11 were most strongly correlated with items in SWLS, whereas the item 'ADL' in LiSat-11 was more weakly correlated with items in SWLS.
The strength of the relationships implies that the two instruments assess similar but not identical aspects of LS and therefore complement each other when it is rated.
最佳生活满意度(LS)被认为是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的一项重要长期结果。然而,目前尚不清楚单一工具能在多大程度上涵盖生活满意度的所有方面,可能需要不同的工具来全面描述生活满意度。本研究的目的是比较使用两种常用工具对创伤性脑损伤后生活满意度的自评情况。
对67名个体(51名男性和16名女性)进行了包含11个条目的生活满意度问卷(LiSat - 11)和包含5个条目的生活满意度量表(SWLS)的测评。对作为创伤性脑损伤后6至15年个体调查一部分收集的数据进行二次分析。
LiSat - 11中的条目1(“总体生活”)与生活满意度量表总分高度相关(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数=0.66;p<0.001)。生活满意度量表总分与LiSat - 11中的条目相关性最强。LiSat - 11中除“家庭生活”和“伴侣关系”外的所有条目与生活满意度量表中的条目呈中度至高度相关。LiSat - 11中的“伴侣关系”条目与生活满意度量表中的任何条目或总分均无相关性。生活满意度量表中“如果我能重新活一次,我不会改变任何事情”这一条目与LiSat - 11中的条目相关性最弱。LiSat - 11中的“职业”和“休闲”条目与生活满意度量表中的条目相关性最强,而LiSat - 11中的“日常生活活动”条目与生活满意度量表中的条目相关性较弱。
这些关系的强度表明,这两种工具评估的是生活满意度相似但不完全相同的方面,因此在进行评分时相互补充。