• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Challenges optimizing the after visit summary.优化就诊后总结所面临的挑战。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Dec;120:14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
2
Assessing the Quality of the After-Visit Summary (AVS) in a Primary-Care Clinic.评估初级保健诊所的就诊后总结(AVS)质量。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jan-Feb;32(1):65-68. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.01.180055.
3
Evaluation of a patient-centered after visit summary in primary care.患者为中心的初级保健就诊后总结评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Aug;101(8):1483-1489. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
4
Electronic Health Record Challenges, Workarounds, and Solutions Observed in Practices Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care.在整合行为健康与初级保健的实践中观察到的电子健康记录挑战、变通方法及解决方案
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S63-72. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150133.
5
Towards a person-centered after-visit summary to facilitate improved heart failure care (HF-AVS): A scoping review and call to action.
Am Heart J. 2025 May;283:53-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.01.015. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
6
Association of patient recall, satisfaction, and adherence to content of an electronic health record (EHR)-generated after visit summary: a randomized clinical trial.患者对电子健康记录(EHR)生成的就诊后总结内容的回忆、满意度和依从性的关联:一项随机临床试验。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;27(2):209-18. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.02.130137.
7
Patient and clinician perspectives on the outpatient after-visit summary: a qualitative study to inform improvements in visit summary design.患者与临床医生对门诊复诊总结的看法:一项旨在为改进复诊总结设计提供信息的定性研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e61-e68. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw106.
8
Implementation of an outpatient electronic health record and emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and office visits among patients with diabetes.实施门诊电子健康记录,并观察糖尿病患者的急诊就诊、住院和门诊就诊情况。
JAMA. 2013 Sep 11;310(10):1060-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.276733.
9
Measuring Primary Care Exam Length Using Electronic Health Record Data.利用电子健康记录数据测量初级保健检查时长。
Med Care. 2021 Jan;59(1):62-66. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001450.
10
Physician Perceptions and Beliefs about Generating and Providing a Clinical Summary of the Office Visit.医生对生成和提供门诊临床总结的认知与信念。
Appl Clin Inform. 2015 Sep 16;6(3):577-90. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-04-RA-0043. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Barriers and Design Opportunities to Improve Healthcare and QOL for Older Adults through Voice Assistants.通过语音助手理解改善老年人医疗保健和生活质量的障碍与设计机会。
ASSETS. 2021 Oct;2021. doi: 10.1145/3441852.3471218. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
2
The Feasibility and Acceptability of Sharing Video Recordings of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Clinical Encounters With Patients and Their Caregivers: Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.与肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者及其护理人员分享临床会诊视频记录的可行性和可接受性:试点随机临床试验
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 26;8:e57519. doi: 10.2196/57519.
3
Impacts of an Acute Care Telenursing Program on Discharge, Patient Experience, and Nursing Experience: Retrospective Cohort Comparison Study.急性护理远程医疗计划对出院、患者体验和护理体验的影响:回顾性队列比较研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 4;26:e54330. doi: 10.2196/54330.
4
Clinician-initiated written communication for families of patients at a long-term acute care hospital.长期急性病医院针对患者家属的临床医生发起的书面沟通。
PEC Innov. 2023 Jun 14;3:100179. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100179. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
5
Use of Epic Electronic Health Record System for Health Care Research: Scoping Review.利用 Epic 电子健康记录系统进行医疗保健研究:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 15;25:e51003. doi: 10.2196/51003.
6
Learnings in Digital Health Design: Insights From a Pilot Web App for Structured Note-Taking for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.数字健康设计中的经验教训:来自类风湿性关节炎患者结构化笔记记录试点网络应用程序的见解
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 28;7:e49358. doi: 10.2196/49358.
7
Evaluating the Usability of an Emergency Department After Visit Summary: Staged Heuristic Evaluation.评估急诊科就诊后总结的可用性:分阶段启发式评估
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Mar 9;10:e43729. doi: 10.2196/43729.
8
Evaluating Providers' Prescription Opioid Instructions to Pediatric Patients.评估医疗服务提供者对儿科患者的阿片类药物处方说明
Children (Basel). 2022 May 11;9(5):707. doi: 10.3390/children9050707.
9
Digital Health Interventions to Enhance Prevention in Primary Care: Scoping Review.数字健康干预措施加强初级保健中的预防工作:范围审查
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jan 21;10(1):e33518. doi: 10.2196/33518.
10
Supporting communication of visit information to informal caregivers: A systematic review.支持向非专业照护者传递就诊信息:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0254896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254896. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics of outpatient clinical summaries in the United States.美国门诊临床总结的特点。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
2
A Patient-Centered Prescription Drug Label to Promote Appropriate Medication Use and Adherence.一份以患者为中心的处方药标签,以促进合理用药和依从性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Dec;31(12):1482-1489. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3816-x. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
3
Patient and clinician perspectives on the outpatient after-visit summary: a qualitative study to inform improvements in visit summary design.患者与临床医生对门诊复诊总结的看法:一项旨在为改进复诊总结设计提供信息的定性研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e61-e68. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw106.
4
Opportunities to improve clinical summaries for patients at hospital discharge.改善患者出院时临床总结的机会。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):372-380. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-005201. Epub 2016 May 6.
5
Awareness and Use of the After-Visit Summary Through a Patient Portal: Evaluation of Patient Characteristics and an Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior.通过患者门户网站对就诊后总结的知晓与使用情况:患者特征评估及计划行为理论的应用
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 13;18(4):e77. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5207.
6
Rising drug allergy alert overrides in electronic health records: an observational retrospective study of a decade of experience.电子健康记录中不断增加的药物过敏警报覆盖:一项十年经验的观察性回顾研究
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 May;23(3):601-8. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv143. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
7
A content analysis of the Meaningful Use clinical summary: do clinical summaries promote patient engagement?对有意义使用临床摘要的内容分析:临床摘要能否促进患者参与?
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016 May;17(3):238-51. doi: 10.1017/S1463423615000353. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
8
True "meaningful use": technology meets both patient and provider needs.真正的“有意义的使用”:技术满足患者和医疗服务提供者双方的需求。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 May 1;21(5):e329-37.
9
Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information.患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)的开发:一种针对印刷和视听患者信息的可理解性和可操作性的新测量方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
10
The CDC Clear Communication Index is a new evidence-based tool to prepare and review health information.美国疾病控制与预防中心清晰沟通指数是一种基于证据的新工具,用于编写和审核健康信息。
Health Promot Pract. 2014 Sep;15(5):629-37. doi: 10.1177/1524839914538969. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

优化就诊后总结所面临的挑战。

Challenges optimizing the after visit summary.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Family Medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2018 Dec;120:14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.09.009
PMID:30409339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6326571/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The after visit summary (AVS) is a paper or electronic document given to patients after a medical appointment, which is intended to summarize patients' health and guide future care, including self-management tasks.

OBJECTIVE

To describe experiences of health systems implementing a redesigned outpatient AVS in commercially available electronic health record (EHR) systems to inform future optimization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with information technology and clinical leaders at 12 hospital and community-based healthcare institutions across the continental United States focusing on the process of AVS redesign and implementation. We also report our experience implementing a redesigned AVS in the Epic EHR at the Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City, NY.

RESULTS

Health systems experienced many challenges implementing the redesigned AVS. While many IT leaders noted that the redesigned AVS is easier to understand and the document is better organized, they claim the effort is time-consuming, Epic system upgrades render AVS modifications non-functional, and primary care and specialty practices have different needs in regards to content and formatting. Our team was able to modify the document by changing the order of print groups, modifying the font size, bolding section headers, and inserting page breaks. Similar to other health systems, our team found that it is difficult to achieve some desired features due to limitations in the EHR platform.

CONCLUSION

Health IT leaders view the AVS as a valuable source of information for patients. However, limitations to AVS modifications in EHR systems present challenges to optimizing the tool. EHR vendors should incorporate learning from healthcare systems innovation efforts and consider building more flexibility into their product development.

摘要

背景

就诊后总结(AVS)是在就诊后提供给患者的纸质或电子文档,旨在总结患者的健康状况并指导未来的护理,包括自我管理任务。

目的

描述卫生系统在商业电子健康记录(EHR)系统中实施重新设计的门诊 AVS 的经验,以为未来的优化提供信息。

材料和方法

我们对美国大陆的 12 家医院和社区医疗机构的信息技术和临床负责人进行了半结构化访谈,重点关注 AVS 重新设计和实施的过程。我们还报告了在纽约市西奈山医院的 Epic EHR 中实施重新设计的 AVS 的经验。

结果

卫生系统在实施重新设计的 AVS 方面遇到了许多挑战。虽然许多 IT 领导人指出重新设计的 AVS 更容易理解,文档也更有条理,但他们声称这是一项耗时的工作,Epic 系统升级使 AVS 更改变得不可用,并且初级保健和专科实践在内容和格式方面有不同的需求。我们的团队能够通过更改打印组的顺序、修改字体大小、加粗部分标题以及插入分页符来修改文档。与其他卫生系统一样,我们的团队发现由于 EHR 平台的限制,很难实现一些期望的功能。

结论

卫生信息技术领导人认为 AVS 是患者信息的有价值来源。然而,EHR 系统中对 AVS 更改的限制对优化该工具带来了挑战。EHR 供应商应从医疗保健系统的创新努力中吸取经验教训,并考虑在其产品开发中增加更多的灵活性。