• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更精细的动物福利衡量标准:一项关于西班牙学生性别差异的研究。

A more fine-grained measure towards animal welfare: a study with regards to gender differences in Spanish students.

机构信息

Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

Departamento de Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales, University of Zaragoza, C/ Pedro Cerbuna, 12, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(1):844-854. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3537-2. Epub 2018 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-018-3537-2
PMID:30415367
Abstract

The environmental issue is nowadays taking more importance in the environmental awareness all around the world, and in this field, animal consideration is more and more spread. A highlighted part in globalisation is the animal welfare awareness. This article presents a study comparing attitudes towards animals among secondary and university students in reference to gender. It was carried out on 1394 Spanish participants from 11 to 26 years. The instrument used in the study is the reviewed version of the Animal Welfare Attitude Scale which was renamed as "Animal Welfare Attitude-Revised Scale" (AWA-R Scale), with a Cronbach α reliability value of 0.85. It is subdivided into four components namely C1: animal abuse for pleasure or due to ignorance; C2: leisure with animals; C3: farm animals; and C4: animal abandonment. These components have been deeply detailed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), which highly contributes to define the position of participants for the different dimensions of animal welfare. It is concluded that significant differences exist between males' and females' attitudes in all components of the AWA-R Scale. It is also suggested that two social characteristics-people's attitudes towards animals and towards environmental protection-are, at the very least, coexistent and may indeed be interdependent. These differences between gender in matters of socialisation could thus be reflected in environmental attitudes, and also in others related to them, i.e. animal welfare attitudes.

摘要

当今世界,环境问题在全球环境意识中变得越来越重要,而在这个领域,动物福利的考虑也越来越受到关注。全球化的一个突出特点是动物福利意识的提高。本文比较了中学生和大学生在性别方面对动物的态度,研究对象为 1394 名 11 至 26 岁的西班牙参与者。研究中使用的工具是经过修订的动物福利态度量表,该量表更名为“动物福利态度修订量表”(AWA-R 量表),信度系数为 0.85。它分为四个组成部分,即 C1:为娱乐或由于无知而虐待动物;C2:与动物一起休闲;C3:农场动物;C4:动物遗弃。通过验证性因素分析(CFA)对这些组成部分进行了深入的详细分析,这对确定参与者在动物福利的不同维度上的立场有很大的帮助。研究结果表明,AWA-R 量表的所有组成部分中,男性和女性的态度存在显著差异。此外,人们对动物和环境保护的态度至少是并存的,实际上可能是相互依存的。因此,在社会化方面的性别差异可能会反映在环境态度上,以及与环境态度相关的其他态度上,例如动物福利态度。

相似文献

1
A more fine-grained measure towards animal welfare: a study with regards to gender differences in Spanish students.更精细的动物福利衡量标准:一项关于西班牙学生性别差异的研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(1):844-854. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3537-2. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
2
Willingness to pay and moral stance: The case of farm animal welfare in Germany.支付意愿与道德立场:以德国的动物福利为例。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 14;13(8):e0202193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202193. eCollection 2018.
3
Assessing attitudes toward farm animal welfare: a national survey of animal science faculty members.评估对农场动物福利的态度:对动物科学教员的全国性调查。
J Anim Sci. 2004 Sep;82(9):2806-14. doi: 10.2527/2004.8292806x.
4
Animal Welfare Attitudes: Effects of Gender and Diet in University Samples from 22 Countries.动物福利态度:22个国家大学样本中性别与饮食的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jun 25;11(7):1893. doi: 10.3390/ani11071893.
5
Understanding the consumer-citizen gap in Chinese public attitudes toward farm animal welfare.理解中国公众对农场动物福利态度中消费者-公民差距。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 18;14(1):6426. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57280-y.
6
Attitudes of veterinary students at one US college toward factors relating to farm animal welfare.美国一所大学的兽医专业学生对与农场动物福利相关因素的态度。
J Vet Med Educ. 2005 Winter;32(4):481-90. doi: 10.3138/jvme.32.4.481.
7
Development of a Canine Care and Welfare Knowledge Scale: Implications for Welfare and Preventing Dogfighting.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2017 Oct-Dec;20(4):344-356. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2017.1330154. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
8
Chinese university students' attitudes toward the ethical treatment and welfare of animals.中国大学生对动物伦理对待和福利的态度。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2006;9(4):289-97. doi: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0904_4.
9
Results of a national survey of US veterinary college faculty regarding attitudes toward farm animal welfare.一项关于美国兽医学院教员对农场动物福利态度的全国性调查结果。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005 May 1;226(9):1538-46. doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.226.1538.
10
Work ethics and general work attitudes in adolescents are related to quality of life, sense of coherence and subjective health - a Swedish questionnaire study.青少年的职业道德和一般工作态度与生活质量、连贯感和主观健康相关——一项瑞典问卷调查研究
BMC Public Health. 2005 Oct 7;5:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-103.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the consumer-citizen gap in Chinese public attitudes toward farm animal welfare.理解中国公众对农场动物福利态度中消费者-公民差距。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 18;14(1):6426. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57280-y.
2
Factors influencing Chinese public attitudes toward farm animal welfare.影响中国公众对农场动物福利态度的因素。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 9;14:1049530. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1049530. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
An International Comparison of Female and Male Students' Attitudes to the Use of Animals.国际比较视角下的女学生和男学生对使用动物的态度。
Animals (Basel). 2010 Dec 9;1(1):7-26. doi: 10.3390/ani1010007.
2
Assessing attitudes toward farm animal welfare: a national survey of animal science faculty members.评估对农场动物福利的态度:对动物科学教员的全国性调查。
J Anim Sci. 2004 Sep;82(9):2806-14. doi: 10.2527/2004.8292806x.
3
Public attitudes toward animal research: some international comparisons.公众对动物研究的态度:一些国际比较。
Soc Anim. 1994;2(2):95-113. doi: 10.1163/156853094x00126.
4
Young people's attitudes to experimentation on animals.年轻人对动物实验的态度。
Psychologist. 1990 Oct;10:444-8.
5
Farm animal welfare: the five freedoms and the free market.农场动物福利:五项自由与自由市场
Vet J. 2001 May;161(3):229-37. doi: 10.1053/tvjl.2000.0563.