• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A qualitative study of stakeholder and researcher perspectives of community engagement practices for HIV vaccine clinical trials in South Africa.南非艾滋病毒疫苗临床试验中社区参与实践的利益相关者和研究人员观点的定性研究。
J Community Psychol. 2023 Apr;51(3):998-1015. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22951. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
2
Experiences from a community advisory Board in the Implementation of early access to ART for all in Eswatini: a qualitative study.在斯威士兰实施全民早期获得抗逆转录病毒治疗的社区咨询委员会经验:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jul 16;20(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0384-8.
3
Participants' characteristics and motivations to screen for HIV vaccine and monoclonal antibody trials in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省参与者参与 HIV 疫苗和单克隆抗体试验筛查的特征和动机。
Trials. 2021 Dec 11;22(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05792-7.
4
Exploring a community's understanding of HIV vaccine‑induced seropositivity in a South African research setting.探索南非研究环境中社区对 HIV 疫苗诱导血清阳性的理解。
S Afr Med J. 2022 Dec 20;113(1):36-41. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2023.v113i1.16670.
5
Rules of engagement: perspectives on stakeholder engagement for genomic biobanking research in South Africa.参与规则:南非基因组生物样本库研究中利益相关者参与的视角
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Feb 27;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0252-y.
6
"Why Don't You Go Into Suburbs? Why Are You Targeting Us?": Trust and Mistrust in HIV Vaccine Trials in South Africa.“你们为什么不进入郊区?为什么把目标对准我们?”:南非HIV疫苗试验中的信任与不信任
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Dec;13(5):525-536. doi: 10.1177/1556264618804740.
7
Standardized metrics can reveal region-specific opportunities in community engagement to aid recruitment in HIV prevention trials.标准化指标可以揭示社区参与方面的特定区域机会,以帮助在艾滋病毒预防试验中招募参与者。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0239276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239276. eCollection 2020.
8
Regulation of community advisory boards during conduct of clinical trials in Uganda: a qualitative study involving stakeholders.乌干达开展临床试验期间社区咨询委员会的监管:一项涉及利益攸关方的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09136-w.
9
HIV cure research in South Africa: a preliminary exploration of stakeholder perspectives.南非的艾滋病治愈研究:利益相关者观点的初步探索
AIDS Care. 2016;28(4):524-7. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2015.1112351. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
10
Forming and implementing community advisory boards in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.在中低收入国家组建和实施社区咨询委员会:范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 17;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0409-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Bibliometric analysis of publications that cited the CIOMS 2016 "International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans".对引用国际医学科学组织委员会(CIOMS)2016年《涉及人类的健康相关研究国际伦理准则》的出版物的文献计量分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 30;10(17):e36833. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36833. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
2
An unclosed loop: Perspectives of community engagement in infectious disease clinical trials in sub-Saharan Africa.未封闭的循环:撒哈拉以南非洲传染病临床试验中社区参与的观点。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 2;19(8):e0308128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308128. eCollection 2024.
3
From Ports2Arms: reimagining demand creation for the African context.源自“港口到武器”组织:重新构想非洲背景下的需求创造。
Front Health Serv. 2023 Dec 19;3:1257990. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1257990. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Is There Risk Compensation among HIV Infected Youth and Adults 15 Years and Older on Antiretroviral Treatment in South Africa? Findings from the 2017 National HIV Prevalence, Incidence, Behaviour and Communication Survey.南非接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的 15 岁及以上艾滋病毒感染者和成人中是否存在风险补偿?2017 年全国艾滋病毒流行率、发病率、行为和传播调查的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 18;19(10):6156. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106156.
2
Increasing Black, Indigenous and People of Color participation in clinical trials through community engagement and recruitment goal establishment.通过社区参与和设定招募目标来增加黑人和原住民以及有色人种参与临床试验的比例。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 19;16(10):e0258858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258858. eCollection 2021.
3
The readability of informed consent forms for research studies conducted in South Africa.南非开展的研究性医学临床试验知情同意书的可读性。
S Afr Med J. 2021 Feb 1;111(2):180-183. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i2.14752.
4
Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy in BIPOC Communities - Toward Trustworthiness, Partnership, and Reciprocity.解决有色人种社区的疫苗犹豫问题——迈向可信度、伙伴关系和互惠互利。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 8;385(2):97-100. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2103104. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
5
Online community engagement in response to COVID-19 pandemic.应对新冠疫情的在线社区参与
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):728-730. doi: 10.1111/hex.13194. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
6
Reflections on the Importance of Community-Partnered Research Strategies for Health Equity in the Era of COVID-19.关于在 COVID-19 时代实现健康公平的社区伙伴关系研究策略的重要性的思考。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2020;31(4):1515-1519. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2020.0112.
7
Standardized metrics can reveal region-specific opportunities in community engagement to aid recruitment in HIV prevention trials.标准化指标可以揭示社区参与方面的特定区域机会,以帮助在艾滋病毒预防试验中招募参与者。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0239276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239276. eCollection 2020.
8
Engagement of community stakeholders to develop a framework to guide research dissemination to communities.让社区利益攸关方参与进来,制定一个框架,以指导向社区传播研究成果。
Health Expect. 2020 Aug;23(4):958-968. doi: 10.1111/hex.13076. Epub 2020 May 25.
9
Stigma, Implicit Bias, and Long-Lasting Prevention Interventions to End the Domestic HIV/AIDS Epidemic.消除国内艾滋病毒/艾滋病流行的污名、隐性偏见和长期预防干预措施。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Jan;110(1):67-68. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305454.
10
"Why Don't You Go Into Suburbs? Why Are You Targeting Us?": Trust and Mistrust in HIV Vaccine Trials in South Africa.“你们为什么不进入郊区?为什么把目标对准我们?”:南非HIV疫苗试验中的信任与不信任
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Dec;13(5):525-536. doi: 10.1177/1556264618804740.

南非艾滋病毒疫苗临床试验中社区参与实践的利益相关者和研究人员观点的定性研究。

A qualitative study of stakeholder and researcher perspectives of community engagement practices for HIV vaccine clinical trials in South Africa.

机构信息

Perinatal HIV Research Unit (PHRU), School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

J Community Psychol. 2023 Apr;51(3):998-1015. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22951. Epub 2022 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1002/jcop.22951
PMID:36342974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10613584/
Abstract

Community engagement increases community trust of research and improves trial participation. However, there is limited documented appraisal of community engagement practices. Several HIV vaccine efficacy trials have been conducted in South Africa, the country most affected by HIV, predominantly in collaboration with the HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN). We explored stakeholder and researcher perspectives of the HVTN community engagement practices used in the Gauteng province of South Africa. In 2017, we conducted a qualitative study. Using semi-structured interview guides, we facilitated two group discussions with Community Advisory Board (CAB) members (n = 13), and 14 in-depth interviews with HVTN-affiliated employees (n = 8 in South Africa and n = 6 in the USA). Group discussions and in-depth interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated into English, and coded using NVIVO 12 Plus software for thematic data analysis. Overall, median age of study participants was 22 (interquartile range 32-54) years, and 74% (n = 20) were female. Three main themes about community engagement emerged: (i) community engagement as an ongoing iterative relationship between researchers and community; (ii) methods of community engagement, encompassing community education by linking with external stakeholders and through awareness campaigns by pamphlet distribution and mass events, working with communities to develop recruitment messages, and working with CAB as a link to communities; and (iii) strategies to improve community engagement, for example, using simple language, linking with religious leaders and traditional healers, and communicating via conventional (newspapers, television, and radio) and social (videos and listicles) media. Our data indicate ways for researchers to improve relationships with community by understanding local needs, strengthening collaborations, and tailoring communication strategies. In this regard, CABs signify critical linkages between researchers and communities. CABs can relay relevant health research needs, advise on the creation of suitable materials, and link researchers more effectively with community leaders and media.

摘要

社区参与可以提高社区对研究的信任度,并促进试验参与。然而,目前对社区参与实践的评估记录有限。几项艾滋病毒疫苗功效试验已在南非进行,南非是受艾滋病毒影响最严重的国家,主要与艾滋病毒疫苗试验网络(HVTN)合作。我们探讨了利益相关者和研究人员对 HVTN 在南非豪登省使用的社区参与实践的看法。2017 年,我们进行了一项定性研究。使用半结构化访谈指南,我们与社区咨询委员会(CAB)成员(n=13)共同主持了两次小组讨论,并与 HVTN 附属员工(n=8 在南非,n=6 在美国)进行了 14 次深入访谈。小组讨论和深入访谈均进行了录音,逐字记录,并翻译成英文,使用 NVIVO 12 Plus 软件对主题数据进行分析。总体而言,研究参与者的中位年龄为 22 岁(四分位距 32-54 岁),74%(n=20)为女性。社区参与出现了三个主要主题:(i)社区参与是研究人员和社区之间持续的迭代关系;(ii)社区参与方法,包括通过与外部利益相关者联系以及通过宣传册分发和大型活动进行社区教育,与社区合作制定招募信息,以及将 CAB 作为与社区联系的纽带;(iii)改善社区参与的策略,例如使用简单的语言,与宗教领袖和传统治疗师联系,以及通过传统(报纸、电视和广播)和社会(视频和清单)媒体进行沟通。我们的数据表明,研究人员可以通过了解当地需求、加强合作和调整沟通策略来改善与社区的关系。在这方面,CAB 是研究人员与社区之间的重要联系纽带。CAB 可以转达相关的健康研究需求,就合适材料的制作提供建议,并更有效地将研究人员与社区领导和媒体联系起来。