• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尼日内六个月以下婴儿使用阿奇霉素的安全性:一项社区随机试验。

Safety of azithromycin in infants under six months of age in Niger: A community randomized trial.

机构信息

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Nov 12;12(11):e0006950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006950. eCollection 2018 Nov.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0006950
PMID:30419040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6258425/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mass azithromycin distribution reduces under-5 child mortality. Trachoma control programs currently treat infants aged 6 months and older. Here, we report findings from an infant adverse event survey in 1-5 month olds who received azithromycin as part of a large community-randomized trial in Niger.

METHODS AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Active surveillance of infants aged 1-5 months at the time of treatment was conducted in 30 randomly selected communities from within a large cluster randomized trial of biannual mass azithromycin distribution compared to placebo to assess the potential impact on child mortality. We compared the distribution of adverse events reported after treatment among azithromycin-treated versus placebo-treated infants. From January 2015 to February 2018, the caregivers of 1,712 infants were surveyed. Approximately one-third of caregivers reported at least one adverse event (azithromycin: 29.6%, placebo: 34.3%, risk ratio [RR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68 to 1.10, P = 0.23). The most commonly reported adverse events included diarrhea (azithromycin: 19.3%, placebo: 28.1%, RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.96, P = 0.03), vomiting (azithromycin: 15.9%, placebo: 21.0%, RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.02, P = 0.07), and skin rash (azithromycin: 12.3%, placebo: 13.6%, RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.37, P = 0.63). No cases of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Azithromycin given to infants aged 1-5 months appeared to be safe. Inclusion of younger infants in larger azithromycin-based child mortality or trachoma control programs could be considered if deemed effective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02048007.

摘要

背景

大规模使用阿奇霉素可以降低五岁以下儿童的死亡率。目前,沙眼控制项目针对的是 6 个月及以上的婴儿。在这里,我们报告了在尼日尔进行的一项大规模社区随机试验中,对 1-5 个月大的婴儿使用阿奇霉素进行治疗的不良反应调查结果。

方法和主要发现

在这项针对 1-5 个月大婴儿的治疗期间进行了主动监测,该监测是在大规模的两年一次大规模阿奇霉素分发与安慰剂对照的随机临床试验中,在 30 个随机选定的社区内进行的,以评估其对儿童死亡率的潜在影响。我们比较了接受阿奇霉素治疗和接受安慰剂治疗的婴儿报告的不良反应分布情况。从 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 2 月,对 1712 名婴儿的照顾者进行了调查。约有三分之一的照顾者报告了至少一种不良反应(阿奇霉素组:29.6%,安慰剂组:34.3%,风险比 [RR]0.86,95%置信区间 [CI]0.68 至 1.10,P=0.23)。最常见的不良反应包括腹泻(阿奇霉素组:19.3%,安慰剂组:28.1%,RR0.68,95%置信区间 [CI]0.49 至 0.96,P=0.03)、呕吐(阿奇霉素组:15.9%,安慰剂组:21.0%,RR0.76,95%置信区间 [CI]0.56 至 1.02,P=0.07)和皮疹(阿奇霉素组:12.3%,安慰剂组:13.6%,RR0.90,95%置信区间 [CI]0.59 至 1.37,P=0.63)。没有报告婴儿肥厚性幽门狭窄的病例。

结论

给 1-5 个月大的婴儿使用阿奇霉素似乎是安全的。如果认为有效,可以考虑将年龄更小的婴儿纳入更大规模的基于阿奇霉素的儿童死亡率或沙眼控制项目中。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02048007。

相似文献

1
Safety of azithromycin in infants under six months of age in Niger: A community randomized trial.尼日内六个月以下婴儿使用阿奇霉素的安全性:一项社区随机试验。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Nov 12;12(11):e0006950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006950. eCollection 2018 Nov.
2
Effect of Biannual Mass Azithromycin Distributions to Preschool-Aged Children on Trachoma Prevalence in Niger: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.尼日尔开展学前儿童隔年阿奇霉素群体服药预防沙眼效果的随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2228244. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28244.
3
Biannual mass azithromycin distributions and malaria parasitemia in pre-school children in Niger: A cluster-randomized, placebo-controlled trial.尼日尔学龄前儿童隔年大剂量阿奇霉素分发与疟疾寄生虫感染:一项整群随机、安慰剂对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2019 Jun 25;16(6):e1002835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002835. eCollection 2019 Jun.
4
Childhood Mortality After Mass Distribution of Azithromycin: A Secondary Analysis of the PRET Cluster-randomized Trial in Niger.大规模发放阿奇霉素后儿童死亡率:尼日尔 PRET 集群随机试验的二次分析。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018 Nov;37(11):1082-1086. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001992.
5
A Cluster-Randomized Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Targeting Trachoma Treatment to Children.一项评估针对沙眼患儿治疗效果的整群随机试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 15;64(6):743-750. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw810.
6
Mass azithromycin distribution for hyperendemic trachoma following a cluster-randomized trial: A continuation study of randomly reassigned subclusters (TANA II).大规模阿奇霉素分发用于流行地区沙眼的随机对照试验后:重新随机分组的亚组的延续研究(TANA II)。
PLoS Med. 2018 Aug 14;15(8):e1002633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002633. eCollection 2018 Aug.
7
Community-level chlamydial serology for assessing trachoma elimination in trachoma-endemic Niger.社区层面的衣原体血清学在评估尼日尔流行地区沙眼消除中的应用。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Jan 28;13(1):e0007127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007127. eCollection 2019 Jan.
8
Comparison of Mass Azithromycin Coverage Targets of Children in Niger: A Cluster-Randomized Trachoma Trial.尼日尔儿童大规模阿奇霉素覆盖目标比较:一项基于群组的随机沙眼试验
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Feb;98(2):389-395. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0501. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
9
Antibiotics for trachoma.用于沙眼的抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16(3):CD001860. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001860.pub3.
10
Community risk factors for ocular Chlamydia infection in Niger: pre-treatment results from a cluster-randomized trachoma trial.尼日尔眼部衣原体感染的社区危险因素:一项随机分组沙眼试验的治疗前结果。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(4):e1586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001586. Epub 2012 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of one prophylactic dose of azithromycin on Bifidobacterium infantis colonization in infants from the Mumta trial.来自Mumta试验的预防性一剂阿奇霉素对婴儿双歧杆菌定植的影响。
Int J Infect Dis. 2025 Apr;153:107794. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107794. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
2
Feasibility and acceptability of integrating mass distribution of azithromycin to children 1-11 months into a trachoma mass drug administration campaign to reduce child mortality in Côte d'Ivoire.在科特迪瓦的沙眼群体药物管理运动中纳入对1至11个月儿童进行阿奇霉素群体给药以降低儿童死亡率的可行性和可接受性。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jul 10;4(7):e0003426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003426. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Azithromycin to Reduce Childhood Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa.阿奇霉素降低撒哈拉以南非洲儿童死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 26;378(17):1583-1592. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1715474.
2
Childhood Mortality After Mass Distribution of Azithromycin: A Secondary Analysis of the PRET Cluster-randomized Trial in Niger.大规模发放阿奇霉素后儿童死亡率:尼日尔 PRET 集群随机试验的二次分析。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018 Nov;37(11):1082-1086. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001992.
3
Spatial clustering of high load ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection in trachoma: a cross-sectional population-based study.
Cost and community acceptability of enhanced antibiotic distribution approaches for trachoma in the Republic of South Sudan: enhancing the A in SAFE (ETAS) study protocol.
在南苏丹共和国,增强型抗生素分发方法治疗沙眼的成本和社区可接受性:增强 SAFE(ETAS)研究方案中的 A 部分。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02783-x.
4
Simplified dosing of oral azithromycin for children 1-11 months old in child survival programmes: age-based and height-based dosing protocols.儿童生存规划中 1-11 个月龄儿童口服阿奇霉素的简化剂量:基于年龄和身高的剂量方案。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Oct;7(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009801.
5
Effect of Biannual Mass Azithromycin Distributions to Preschool-Aged Children on Trachoma Prevalence in Niger: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.尼日尔开展学前儿童隔年阿奇霉素群体服药预防沙眼效果的随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2228244. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28244.
6
Secondary Effects from Mass Azithromycin Administration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.大剂量阿奇霉素使用的次要效应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 Aug 15;107(4):904-911. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0134. Print 2022 Oct 12.
7
Mass drug administration of antibacterials: weighing the evidence regarding benefits and risks.抗菌药物的群体给药:权衡利弊证据
Infect Dis Poverty. 2022 Jun 30;11(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-00998-6.
8
Neonatal azithromycin administration for prevention of infant mortality.新生儿使用阿奇霉素预防婴儿死亡。
NEJM Evid. 2022 Apr;1(4):EVIDoa2100054. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2100054. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
9
Trachoma.沙眼。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022 May 26;8(1):32. doi: 10.1038/s41572-022-00359-5.
10
Malaria positivity following a single oral dose of azithromycin among children in Burkina Faso: a randomized controlled trial.在布基纳法索,单次口服阿奇霉素后儿童疟疾阳性率:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 25;22(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07296-4.
沙眼衣原体高负荷眼部感染在沙眼中的空间聚集性:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Pathog Dis. 2017 Jul 31;75(5). doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftx050.
4
Progress and projections in the program to eliminate trachoma.沙眼消除计划的进展与预测
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Apr 20;11(4):e0005402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005402. eCollection 2017 Apr.
5
Perinatal risk factors for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: A meta-analysis.婴儿肥厚性幽门狭窄的围产期危险因素:一项荟萃分析。
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Sep;52(9):1389-1397. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
6
Azithromycin in Labor Lowers Clinical Infections in Mothers and Newborns: A Double-Blind Trial.分娩时使用阿奇霉素可降低母亲和新生儿的临床感染:一项双盲试验
Pediatrics. 2017 Feb;139(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2281.
7
A Cluster-Randomized Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Targeting Trachoma Treatment to Children.一项评估针对沙眼患儿治疗效果的整群随机试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 15;64(6):743-750. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw810.
8
Global, regional, national, and selected subnational levels of stillbirths, neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1980 - 2015年全球、区域、国家及部分国家以下各级死产、新生儿、婴儿及5岁以下儿童死亡率:全球疾病负担研究2015的系统分析
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1725-1774. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31575-6.
9
Post-natal erythromycin exposure and risk of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.产后红霉素暴露与婴儿肥厚性幽门狭窄风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Pediatr Surg Int. 2016 Dec;32(12):1147-1152. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-3971-5. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
10
Formula-feeding and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: is there an association? A case-control study.配方奶喂养与肥厚性幽门狭窄:存在关联吗?一项病例对照研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 May;51(5):779-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.021. Epub 2016 Feb 12.