• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估研究伙伴关系网络的影响:一项纵向多案例研究方案。

Evaluating the impact of a network of research partnerships: a longitudinal multiple case study protocol.

机构信息

School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.

International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 12;16(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0377-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-018-0377-y
PMID:30419902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6233573/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conducting and/or disseminating research together with community stakeholders (e.g. policy-makers, practitioners, community organisations, patients) is a promising approach to generating relevant and impactful research. However, creating strong and successful partnerships between researchers and stakeholders is complex. Thus far, an in-depth understanding of how, when and why these research partnerships are successful is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate and explain the outcomes and impacts of a national network of researchers and community stakeholders over time in order to gain a better understanding of how, when and why research partnerships are successful (or not).

METHODS

This longitudinal multiple case study will use data from the Canadian Disability Participation Project, a large national network of researchers and community stakeholders working together to enhance community participation among people with physical disabilities. To maximise the impact of research conducted within the Canadian Disability Participation Project network, researchers are supported in developing and implementing knowledge translation plans. The components of the RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance) will guide this study. Data will be collected from different perspectives (researchers, stakeholders) using different methods (logs, surveys, timeline interviews) at different time points during the years 2018-2021. A combination of data analysis methods, including network analysis and cluster analysis, will be used to study the RE-AIM components. Qualitative data will be used to supplement the findings and further understand the variation in the RE-AIM components over time and across groups.

DISCUSSION

The outcomes, impacts and processes of conducting and disseminating research together with community stakeholders will be extensively studied. The longitudinal design of this study will provide a unique opportunity to examine research partnerships over time and understand the underlying processes using a variety of innovative research methods (e.g. network analyses, timeline interviews). This study will contribute to opening the 'black box' of doing successful and impactful health research in partnership with community stakeholders.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/kj5xa/ .

摘要

背景

与社区利益相关者(如政策制定者、从业者、社区组织、患者)共同开展和/或传播研究是生成相关且有影响力的研究的一种有前景的方法。然而,研究人员和利益相关者之间建立强大而成功的伙伴关系是复杂的。迄今为止,人们对这些研究伙伴关系何时、为何以及如何成功缺乏深入了解。本研究旨在评估和解释一个国家范围内的研究人员和社区利益相关者网络随着时间的推移的结果和影响,以便更好地了解研究伙伴关系何时、为何以及如何成功(或失败)。

方法

本纵向多案例研究将使用加拿大残疾参与项目的数据,该项目是一个由研究人员和社区利益相关者组成的大型国家网络,旨在增强身体残疾者的社区参与度。为了最大限度地提高加拿大残疾参与项目网络内开展的研究的影响力,研究人员得到支持以制定和实施知识转化计划。RE-AIM 框架(覆盖范围、效果、采用、实施和维持)的组成部分将指导本研究。将从不同的角度(研究人员、利益相关者)使用不同的方法(日志、调查、时间线访谈)在 2018-2021 年期间的不同时间点收集数据。将使用多种数据分析方法(包括网络分析和聚类分析)来研究 RE-AIM 组成部分。定性数据将用于补充研究结果,并进一步了解随时间和跨群体的 RE-AIM 组成部分的变化。

讨论

将广泛研究与社区利益相关者共同开展和传播研究的结果、影响和过程。本研究的纵向设计将提供一个独特的机会,随着时间的推移检查研究伙伴关系,并使用各种创新的研究方法(例如网络分析、时间线访谈)了解潜在过程。这项研究将有助于揭开与社区利益相关者合作开展成功且有影响力的健康研究的“黑箱”。

试验注册

开放科学框架:https://osf.io/kj5xa/ 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f28c/6233573/735f937e0493/12961_2018_377_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f28c/6233573/45a600298e5a/12961_2018_377_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f28c/6233573/735f937e0493/12961_2018_377_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f28c/6233573/45a600298e5a/12961_2018_377_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f28c/6233573/735f937e0493/12961_2018_377_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the impact of a network of research partnerships: a longitudinal multiple case study protocol.评估研究伙伴关系网络的影响:一项纵向多案例研究方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 12;16(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0377-y.
2
A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.对研究伙伴关系方法的原则、策略、结果和影响的综述:综合研究伙伴关系文献的第一步。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 25;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0544-9.
3
Lessons learned in measuring patient engagement in a Canada-wide childhood disability network.在加拿大全国性儿童残疾网络中衡量患者参与度所汲取的经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 7;10(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00551-9.
4
Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programmes and policy: protocol for a research programme on integrated knowledge translation.将知识转化为行动,以实现更有效的实践、项目和政策:综合知识转化研究计划方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 2;13(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0700-y.
5
A review protocol on research partnerships: a Coordinated Multicenter Team approach.研究伙伴关系综述:一种协调的多中心团队方法。
Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 30;7(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0879-2.
6
Application of the i-PARIHS framework for enhancing understanding of interactive dissemination to achieve wide-scale improvement in Indigenous primary healthcare.应用 i-PARIHS 框架增强对互动传播的理解,以实现原住民初级医疗的广泛改善。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 29;16(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0392-z.
7
Stakeholders' engagement in co-producing policy-relevant knowledge to facilitate employment for persons with developmental disabilities.利益相关者参与共同制定与政策相关的知识,以促进发展性残疾人士的就业。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Apr 17;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00548-2.
8
Experiences with rehabilitation and impact on community participation among adults with physical disability in Colombia: perspectives from stakeholders using a community based research approach.哥伦比亚身体残疾成年人康复经历及其对社区参与的影响:基于社区的研究方法中利益相关者的观点。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 3;18(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0923-4.
9
Embracing complexity and uncertainty to create impact: exploring the processes and transformative potential of co-produced research through development of a social impact model.拥抱复杂性和不确定性以产生影响:通过开发社会影响模型探索共同产生的研究的过程和变革潜力。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Dec 11;16(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0375-0.
10
Evaluation of the promising neighbourhoods community program to reduce health inequalities in youth: a protocol of a mixed-methods study.评价“有前途的邻里社区”项目减少青年健康不平等状况的效果:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 14;19(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6901-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The co-development and evaluation of an e-learning course on spinal cord injury physical activity counselling: a randomized controlled trial.一项关于脊髓损伤身体活动咨询的电子学习课程的共同开发和评估:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 6;24(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05141-7.
2
Developing, implementing, and monitoring tailored strategies for integrated knowledge translation in five sub-Saharan African countries.在五个撒哈拉以南非洲国家制定、实施和监测有针对性的综合知识转化策略。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Sep 4;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01038-x.
3
Introducing the Practice Dive Approach: an extension of co-creation in physical activity promotion and health promotion.

本文引用的文献

1
Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher's experiences from 20 projects.合作和伙伴关系研究以改善卫生和社会服务:研究人员从 20 个项目中获得的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 May 30;16(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0322-0.
2
Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programmes and policy: protocol for a research programme on integrated knowledge translation.将知识转化为行动,以实现更有效的实践、项目和政策:综合知识转化研究计划方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 2;13(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0700-y.
3
Systematic Review of Community-Engaged Research in Ophthalmology.
引入实践潜水方法:在身体活动促进和健康促进中的共同创造的延伸。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_2):ii53-ii64. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab160.
4
Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach.共同创建身体活动干预措施:一种混合方法评估途径。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Mar 15;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00699-w.
5
Logic model framework for considering the inputs, processes and outcomes of a healthcare organisation-research partnership.用于考虑医疗保健组织-研究伙伴关系的投入、过程和结果的逻辑模型框架。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):746-755. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010059. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
6
Move the north: evaluation of a regional stakeholder engagement initiative to support the development of a community-partnered physical activity research agenda.向北推进:评估一项区域利益相关者参与倡议,以支持制定社区合作的体育活动研究议程。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Nov 27;5:37. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0167-x. eCollection 2019.
7
Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering With University-Based Researchers in Canada - A Call to "Re-imagine" Research.在加拿大与大学研究人员合作方面的健康领导力经验——呼吁“重新构想”研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Dec 1;8(12):684-699. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.66.
眼科社区参与研究的系统评价
Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2017;12(3):233-241. doi: 10.1080/17469899.2017.1311787. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
4
Defining Integrated Knowledge Translation and Moving Forward: A Response to Recent Commentaries.定义整合性知识转化并向前迈进:对近期评论的回应
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):299-300. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.15.
5
Barriers, facilitators, strategies and outcomes to engaging policymakers, healthcare managers and policy analysts in knowledge synthesis: a scoping review protocol.让政策制定者、医疗保健管理者和政策分析师参与知识综合的障碍、促进因素、策略及成果:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 23;6(12):e013929. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013929.
6
Research agenda for integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in healthcare: what we know and do not yet know.医疗保健领域综合知识转化(IKT)的研究议程:我们已知与未知的内容。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Feb;71(2):105-106. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207743. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
7
Achieving Research Impact Through Co-creation in Community-Based Health Services: Literature Review and Case Study.通过社区卫生服务中的共同创造实现研究影响力:文献综述与案例研究
Milbank Q. 2016 Jun;94(2):392-429. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12197.
8
Broadening the Conceptualization of Participation of Persons With Physical Disabilities: A Configurative Review and Recommendations.拓宽身体残疾者参与的概念化:一项构型综述与建议
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Feb;98(2):395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 May 20.
9
Opening the Black Box: Conceptualizing Community Engagement From 109 Community-Academic Partnership Programs.打开黑匣子:从109个社区-学术合作项目中构建社区参与的概念
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016 Spring;10(1):51-61. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0019.
10
Community-Academic Partnerships: A Systematic Review of the State of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research.社区-学术伙伴关系:文献现状的系统综述及对未来研究的建议
Milbank Q. 2016 Mar;94(1):163-214. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12184.