Suppr超能文献

ASA 身体状况分级与麻醉医师经验相关:一项基于调查的全国性研究。

Assignment of ASA-physical status relates to anesthesiologists' experience: a survey-based national-study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine - DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Feb;72(1):53-59. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00224. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) is a grading system adopted worldwide by anesthesiologists to classify the overall health status of patients. Its importance is demonstrated not only by its routinely use in clinical practice, but also by its deployment in other healthcare-related environments. However, a weak/moderate inter-observer agreement for ASA-PS has been previously shown and, although definitions and clinical examples of each class were provided by ASA, doubts remain on the individual factors influencing the assignment to an ASA-PS class. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and how an anesthesiologist's experience conditions the classification into a specific ASA-PS class.

METHODS

An online survey presenting 8 fictitious patients was administered to a group of Italian anesthesiologists and residents of different experience. Respondents were asked to assign each one of the 8 patients to a specific ASA-PS class. For the comparisons, anesthesiologists were subdivided into 5 classes according to the experience as anesthesiologists.

RESULTS

Six hundred one surveys were correctly completed. The highest mean number of correct answers was obtained by residents, and this number decreased progressively with increasing work experience. The lowest value was recorded in the most experienced group (≥ 20 years of experience).

CONCLUSIONS

Low inter-reliability and experience-dependence of ASA-PS must be taken into account when evaluating a patient, particularly in settings where wide differences in experience are present.

摘要

背景

美国麻醉医师协会身体状况(ASA-PS)分级系统是一种被全球麻醉医师采用的分级系统,用于对患者的整体健康状况进行分类。它的重要性不仅体现在临床实践中的常规应用,还体现在其他与医疗保健相关的环境中的应用。然而,之前已经证明 ASA-PS 的观察者间一致性较弱/中等,尽管 ASA 提供了每个类别的定义和临床示例,但对于影响 ASA-PS 类别的个体因素仍存在疑问。本研究旨在调查麻醉医师的经验是否以及如何影响特定 ASA-PS 类别的分类。

方法

向一组意大利麻醉医师和不同经验水平的住院医师在线调查了 8 名虚构患者。要求受访者将每一位患者分配到特定的 ASA-PS 类别。为了进行比较,根据作为麻醉医师的经验,将麻醉医师分为 5 个类别。

结果

共完成了 601 份有效调查。住院医师的平均正确答案数最高,随着工作经验的增加,该数字逐渐降低。在经验最丰富的组(≥20 年经验)中记录到的数值最低。

结论

在评估患者时,必须考虑到 ASA-PS 的低可靠性和经验依赖性,尤其是在经验差异较大的情况下。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验