Suppr超能文献

抗癫痫药物治疗负担对医疗资源利用和成本的影响。

Impact of antiepileptic-drug treatment burden on health-care-resource utilization and costs.

作者信息

Rajagopalan Krithika, Candrilli Sean D, Ajmera Mayank

机构信息

Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc, Marlborough, MA 01752, USA,

RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.

出版信息

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Oct 16;10:619-627. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S180913. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complex titration requirements and dosing of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may pose a significant treatment burden for patients with epilepsy. This study evaluated health-care-resource utilization (HCRU) rates and costs by treatment burden, defined as number of daily pills and dosing frequency, among managed-care enrollees with epilepsy who initiated AED monotherapy.

METHODS

This retrospective longitudinal study examined administrative HC-claim data in patients aged ≥18 years with two or more pharmacy claims for an AED and two or more medical claims for epilepsy or afebrile convulsion. The number of daily AED pills was estimated at index as the total number of pills dispensed divided by the days supplied, and categorized as more than zero/one, one/two, two/three, and more than three per day. AED-dosing frequency was measured at index and categorized as one, two, three, or four times daily. Postindex 12-month all-cause and epilepsy-related HCRU and costs were estimated using multivariable Poisson regression models and generalized linear models, respectively.

RESULTS

Unadjusted total all-cause and epilepsy-related costs at 12 months postindex averaged US$26,015 per person and US$5,557 per person (2017 values), respectively. Adjusted all-cause and epilepsy-related costs were US$25,918 per person and US$5,602 per person, respectively. A pill burden of more than three a day was associated with a 6.7% increase in total annual HC costs compared with one pill/day. Patients receiving one/two, two/three, and more than three pills per day had 13.3%, 23.9%, and 38.3% higher epilepsy-related costs, respectively, than those receiving one pill per day (<0.0001). Increase in dosing frequency was associated with greater total HCRU and higher costs, but only patients with twice-daily dosing had significantly higher epilepsy-related costs.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this study suggest that increased treatment burden is associated with greater HCRU and higher overall and epilepsy-related costs. Reducing treatment burden via selection of AED therapy with reduced pill numbers and dosing frequency should be considered to improve health and economic outcomes.

摘要

背景

抗癫痫药物(AEDs)复杂的滴定要求和给药方式可能给癫痫患者带来巨大的治疗负担。本研究评估了接受AED单药治疗的癫痫管理式医疗参保者按治疗负担(定义为每日药片数量和给药频率)划分的医疗资源利用率(HCRU)和成本。

方法

这项回顾性纵向研究检查了年龄≥18岁、有两份或更多AED药房报销记录以及两份或更多癫痫或无热惊厥医疗报销记录的患者的行政医保报销数据。每日AED药片数量在索引时估计为配发药片总数除以供应天数,并分为每天多于零/一片、一/两片、两/三片和多于三片。AED给药频率在索引时测量,并分为每日一次、两次、三次或四次。索引后12个月的全因和癫痫相关HCRU及成本分别使用多变量泊松回归模型和广义线性模型进行估计。

结果

索引后12个月未经调整的全因和癫痫相关总成本平均每人分别为26,015美元和5,557美元(2017年价值)。调整后的全因和癫痫相关成本分别为每人25,918美元和5,602美元。与每天一片相比,每天药片负担超过三片与年度医保总成本增加6.7%相关。每天服用一/两片、两/三片和多于三片的患者的癫痫相关成本分别比每天服用一片的患者高13.3%、23.9%和38.3%(<0.0001)。给药频率增加与更高的总HCRU和更高的成本相关,但只有每日两次给药的患者癫痫相关成本显著更高。

结论

本研究结果表明,治疗负担增加与更高的HCRU以及更高的总体和癫痫相关成本相关。应考虑通过选择药片数量和给药频率较低的AED治疗来减轻治疗负担,以改善健康和经济结局。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验