MacKenzie K R
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston 77225.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1988 Jul;39(7):742-52. doi: 10.1176/ps.39.7.742.
The clinical effectiveness and many of the therapeutic mechanisms of brief psychotherapy have been validated through research studies in recent years, as indicated in this review of developments in the psychodynamic and interpersonal brief therapies. However, the literature shows considerable variation in methods for establishing time limits and in exclusion criteria. In a major shift in therapeutic practice, interpersonal rather than intrapsychic concepts are used to identify the focus of therapy, and systematic techniques for defining the therapeutic focus have been developed. The therapeutic alliance and its relation to outcome also have received substantial attention. Trends in service delivery clearly indicate increasing emphasis on brief psychotherapy, which must be conceptualized as a specific modality, not just as long-term therapy compressed.
近年来,如本次对心理动力和人际短程治疗进展的综述所示,短程心理治疗的临床有效性及许多治疗机制已通过研究得到验证。然而,文献表明在设定时间限制的方法和排除标准方面存在相当大的差异。在治疗实践的一个重大转变中,人际概念而非心理内部概念被用于确定治疗重点,并且已经开发出定义治疗重点的系统技术。治疗联盟及其与治疗结果的关系也受到了广泛关注。服务提供的趋势清楚地表明,对短程心理治疗的重视日益增加,短程心理治疗必须被视为一种特定的治疗方式,而不仅仅是压缩的长期治疗。