Suppr超能文献

联合热适应训练和“高住低训”低氧对热适应能力的损害。

Impaired Heat Adaptation From Combined Heat Training and "Live High, Train Low" Hypoxia.

出版信息

Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 May 1;14(5):635-643. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0399. Epub 2019 Apr 21.

Abstract

To determine whether combining training in heat with "Live High, Train Low" hypoxia (LHTL) further improves thermoregulatory and cardiovascular responses to a heat-tolerance test compared with independent heat training. A total of 25 trained runners (peak oxygen uptake = 64.1 [8.0] mL·min·kg) completed 3-wk training in 1 of 3 conditions: (1) heat training combined with "LHTL" hypoxia (H+H; FO = 14.4% [3000 m], 13 h·d; train at <600 m, 33°C, 55% relative humidity [RH]), (2) heat training (HOT; live and train <600 m, 33°C, 55% RH), and (3) temperate training (CONT; live and train <600 m, 13°C, 55% RH). Heat adaptations were determined from a 45-min heat-response test (33°C, 55% RH, 65% velocity corresponding to the peak oxygen uptake) at baseline and immediately and 1 and 3 wk postexposure (baseline, post, 1 wkP, and 3 wkP, respectively). Core temperature, heart rate, sweat rate, sodium concentration, plasma volume, and perceptual responses were analyzed using magnitude-based inferences. Submaximal heart rate (effect size [ES] = -0.60 [-0.89; -0.32]) and core temperature (ES = -0.55 [-0.99; -0.10]) were reduced in HOT until 1 wkP. Sweat rate (ES = 0.36 [0.12; 0.59]) and sweat sodium concentration (ES = -0.82 [-1.48; -0.16]) were, respectively, increased and decreased until 3 wkP in HOT. Submaximal heart rate (ES = -0.38 [-0.85; 0.08]) was likely reduced in H+H at 3 wkP, whereas CONT had unclear physiological changes. Perceived exertion and thermal sensation were reduced across all groups. Despite greater physiological stress from combined heat training and "LHTL" hypoxia, thermoregulatory adaptations are limited in comparison with independent heat training. The combined stimuli provide no additional physiological benefit during exercise in hot environments.

摘要

为了确定在热适应训练中结合“高住低训”(LHTL)低氧(H+H)是否比单独的热适应训练更能改善热耐力测试时的体温调节和心血管反应,共有 25 名有经验的跑步者(峰值摄氧量=64.1[8.0]mL·min·kg)完成了 3 周的训练,在以下 3 种条件中的 1 种条件下进行:(1)热适应训练与“LHTL”低氧(H+H;FO=14.4%[3000m],13 小时·天;在<600m、33°C、55%相对湿度[RH]下训练),(2)热适应训练(HOT;在<600m、33°C、55%RH 下生活和训练),和(3)温和训练(CONT;在<600m、13°C、55%RH 下生活和训练)。通过在基线和暴露后立即以及 1 周和 3 周时(分别为基线、后、1 周后和 3 周后)进行 45 分钟的热反应测试(33°C,55%RH,65%速度对应峰值摄氧量)来确定热适应情况。使用基于幅度的推断分析核心温度、心率、出汗率、钠浓度、血浆容量和知觉反应。直到 1 周后,HOT 中的最大心率(效应量[ES]=-0.60[-0.89;-0.32])和核心温度(ES=-0.55[-0.99;-0.10])降低。直到 3 周后,HOT 中的出汗率(ES=0.36[0.12;0.59])和汗钠浓度(ES=-0.82[-1.48;-0.16])分别增加和减少。在 3 周后,H+H 中的最大心率(ES=-0.38[-0.85;0.08])可能降低,而 CONT 则没有明显的生理变化。所有组的感知用力和热感觉均降低。尽管 H+H 中的热适应训练和“LHTL”低氧结合产生了更大的生理压力,但与单独的热适应训练相比,体温调节适应的程度有限。在热环境中运动时,联合刺激没有提供额外的生理益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验