The BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Tucson High Magnet School, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
J Virol. 2019 Jan 17;93(3). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01767-18. Print 2019 Feb 1.
Although microviruses do not possess a visible tail structure, one vertex rearranges after interacting with host lipopolysaccharides. Most examinations of host range, eclipse, and penetration were conducted before this "host-induced" unique vertex was discovered and before DNA sequencing became routine. Consequently, structure-function relationships dictating host range remain undefined. Biochemical and genetic analyses were conducted with two closely related microviruses, α3 and ST-1. Despite ∼90% amino acid identity, the natural host of α3 is C, whereas ST-1 is a K-12-specific phage. Virions attached and eclipsed to both native and unsusceptible hosts; however, they breached only the native host's cell wall. This suggests that unsusceptible host-phage interactions promote off-pathway reactions that can inactivate viruses without penetration. This phenomenon may have broader ecological implications. To determine which structural proteins conferred host range specificity, chimeric virions were generated by individually interchanging the coat, spike, or DNA pilot proteins. Interchanging the coat protein switched host range. However, host range expansion could be conferred by single point mutations in the coat protein. The expansion phenotype was recessive: genetically mutant progeny from coinfected cells did not display the phenotype. Thus, mutant isolation required populations generated in environments with low multiplicities of infection (MOI), a phenomenon that may have impacted past host range studies in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems. The resulting genetic and structural data were consistent enough that host range expansion could be predicted, broadening the classical definition of antireceptors to include interfaces between protein complexes within the capsid. To expand host range, viruses must interact with unsusceptible host cell surfaces, which could be detrimental. As observed in this study, virions were inactivated without genome penetration. This may be advantageous to potential new hosts, culling the viral population from which an expanded host range mutant could emerge. When identified, altered host range mutations were recessive. Accordingly, isolation required populations generated in low-MOI environments. However, in laboratory settings, viral propagation includes high-MOI conditions. Typically, infected cultures incubate until all cells produce progeny. Thus, coinfections dominate later replication cycles, masking recessive host range expansion phenotypes. This may have impacted similar studies with other viruses. Last, structural and genetic data could be used to predict site-directed mutant phenotypes, which may broaden the classic antireceptor definition to include interfaces between capsid complexes.
虽然微病毒没有可见的尾部结构,但在与宿主脂多糖相互作用后,其中一个顶点会发生重排。在发现这种“宿主诱导”的独特顶点以及 DNA 测序成为常规操作之前,大多数对宿主范围、隐蔽和穿透的检查都是在此之前进行的。因此,决定宿主范围的结构-功能关系仍未定义。使用两种密切相关的微病毒 α3 和 ST-1 进行了生化和遗传分析。尽管氨基酸序列的同一性约为 90%,但 α3 的天然宿主是 C,而 ST-1 是 K-12 特异性噬菌体。病毒颗粒附着并隐蔽于天然和不敏感宿主上;然而,它们只突破了天然宿主的细胞壁。这表明不敏感的宿主-噬菌体相互作用促进了旁路反应,这些反应可以在不穿透的情况下使病毒失活。这种现象可能具有更广泛的生态意义。为了确定哪些结构蛋白赋予了宿主范围特异性,通过单独交换衣壳、刺突或 DNA 先导蛋白来生成嵌合病毒颗粒。交换衣壳蛋白可改变宿主范围。然而,通过衣壳蛋白中的单点突变也可以赋予宿主范围的扩展。扩展表型是隐性的:来自共感染细胞的遗传突变后代不表现出该表型。因此,需要在感染复数(MOI)较低的环境中生成群体来分离突变体,这种现象可能会影响过去在原核和真核系统中进行的宿主范围研究。产生的遗传和结构数据足够一致,以至于可以预测宿主范围的扩展,从而将抗受体的经典定义扩展到衣壳内蛋白复合物之间的界面。为了扩大宿主范围,病毒必须与不敏感的宿主细胞表面相互作用,这可能是有害的。正如本研究中观察到的,病毒颗粒在不穿透基因组的情况下失活。这可能对潜在的新宿主有利,淘汰了可能出现扩展宿主范围的突变体的病毒种群。当鉴定出改变的宿主范围突变时,它们是隐性的。因此,需要在 MOI 较低的环境中生成群体来分离突变体。然而,在实验室环境中,病毒的繁殖包括高 MOI 条件。通常,感染培养物会孵育直至所有细胞产生后代。因此,共感染在后期复制周期中占主导地位,掩盖了隐性宿主范围扩展表型。这可能会影响其他病毒的类似研究。最后,结构和遗传数据可用于预测定点突变体的表型,这可能会将经典抗受体的定义扩展到衣壳复合物之间的界面。