• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing the Understanding of Pediatric-Oriented Medication Education Materials Versus Standard Available Education Materials.评估面向儿童的药物教育材料与现有标准教育材料的理解情况。
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep-Oct;23(5):362-366. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-23.5.362.
2
Do pictograms improve children's understanding of medicine leaflet information?象形图能提高儿童对药品说明书信息的理解吗?
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Dec;55(3):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.04.006.
3
Readability Analysis of the Package Leaflets for Biological Medicines Available on the Internet Between 2007 and 2013: An Analytical Longitudinal Study.2007年至2013年互联网上生物药品包装说明书的可读性分析:一项纵向分析研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 25;18(5):e100. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5145.
4
Evaluation of Over-the-Counter Medication Knowledge and Literacy in Adolescent Students.评估青少年学生的非处方药知识和素养。
Acad Pediatr. 2018 Jul;18(5):556-562. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
5
Readability assessment of package leaflets of biosimilars.生物类似药说明书的可读性评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):e024837. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024837.
6
The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the World Wide Web.万维网上儿科患者教育资料的可读性。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Jul;155(7):807-12. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.155.7.807.
7
Effects of the pharmaceutical technologic aspects of oral pediatric drugs on patient-related outcomes: a systematic literature review.口服儿科药物的药剂学方面对患者相关结局的影响:系统文献回顾。
Clin Ther. 2010 May;32(5):924-38. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.05.005.
8
Patients' use and perception of medication information leaflets.患者对药品说明书的使用及认知。
Ann Pharmacother. 2007 May;41(5):777-82. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H686. Epub 2007 Apr 3.
9
The effect of drug information leaflets on patient behavior.药品说明书对患者行为的影响。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2007 May;9(5):383-6.
10
Reading ability of parents compared with reading level of pediatric patient education materials.父母的阅读能力与儿科患者教育资料的阅读水平比较。
Pediatrics. 1994 Mar;93(3):460-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Worth the paper they are printed on? Findings from an independent evaluation of the understandability of patient information leaflets for antiseizure medications.纸上谈兵?抗癫痫药物患者信息传单易懂性的独立评估结果。
Epilepsia. 2022 Aug;63(8):2130-2143. doi: 10.1111/epi.17299. Epub 2022 May 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Usability of FDA-approved medication guides.FDA 批准的用药指南的可用性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Dec;27(12):1714-20. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2068-7. Epub 2012 May 8.
2
What do children know about medications? A review of the literature to guide clinical practice.儿童对药物了解多少?文献综述以指导临床实践。
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Mar;57(3):291-5.
3
Consumer understanding of prescription drug information: an illustration using an antidepressant medication.消费者对处方药信息的理解:以抗抑郁药物为例。
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Apr;45(4):452-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P477. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
4
Prescription drug labeling medication errors: a big deal for pharmacists.处方药标签用药错误:对药剂师来说是个大问题。
J Young Pharm. 2010 Jan;2(1):107-11. doi: 10.4103/0975-1483.62218.
5
Health literacy and children: recommendations for action.健康素养与儿童:行动建议
Pediatrics. 2009 Nov;124 Suppl 3:S327-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1162I.
6
Health literacy and child health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.健康素养与儿童健康结局:文献系统综述
Pediatrics. 2009 Nov;124 Suppl 3:S265-74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1162B.
7
Randomized controlled trial of a pictogram-based intervention to reduce liquid medication dosing errors and improve adherence among caregivers of young children.一项基于象形图的干预措施的随机对照试验,旨在减少儿童液体药物给药错误并提高幼儿照料者的依从性。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Sep;162(9):814-22. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.162.9.814.
8
Health literacy and pediatric health.健康素养与儿童健康。
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2007 Aug;37(7):258-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2007.04.002.
9
Supporting self-management in patients with chronic illness.支持慢性病患者的自我管理。
Am Fam Physician. 2005 Oct 15;72(8):1503-10.
10
Health literacy: the gap between physicians and patients.健康素养:医生与患者之间的差距。
Am Fam Physician. 2005 Aug 1;72(3):463-8.

评估面向儿童的药物教育材料与现有标准教育材料的理解情况。

Assessing the Understanding of Pediatric-Oriented Medication Education Materials Versus Standard Available Education Materials.

作者信息

Biggs Jessica M, Glasgow Nicole E, Pradel Francoise, Morgan Jill A

出版信息

J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep-Oct;23(5):362-366. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-23.5.362.

DOI:10.5863/1551-6776-23.5.362
PMID:30429689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6213628/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine if education material targeting children would improve understanding of medication indication, administration, and common side effects in pediatric subjects.

METHODS

This cross-sectional pilot study included students 7 to 11 years old from a suburban elementary school. Study participants were read either the US Food and Drug Administration-approved adult medication leaflet or a pediatric medication leaflet created at a first-grade reading level for levetiracetam (Keppra, UCB, Inc, Atlanta, GA). Students were asked a set of standardized survey questions to evaluate comprehension of side effects, medication indication, dosing frequency, administration, and overall impression of the leaflet.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight children were included. Fifty percent of the children were male, 79% were Caucasian, and the average age was 9 years. There was no statistical difference for demographics in the adult leaflet versus the pediatric leaflet group. Children correctly stated the indication for the medication in 30% of participants (9/30) in the adult leaflet group and 79% of participants (22/28) in the pediatric leaflet group, p = 0.002. The administration frequency question was answered correctly in 93% of the pediatric leaflet group (26/28) as compared to 73% in the adult leaflet group (22/30), p = 0.05. For questions about side effects and how to administer the medication, there was no difference between the groups. The responses regarding readability and understanding of the leaflets were significantly different in the pediatric leaflet group compared to the adult leaflet group, p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Leaflets designed for pediatric patients resulted in an improvement in the understanding of the indication for levetiracetam.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定针对儿童的教育材料是否能提高儿科患者对药物适应症、给药方法及常见副作用的理解。

方法

这项横断面试点研究纳入了一所郊区小学7至11岁的学生。研究参与者分别阅读美国食品药品监督管理局批准的成人用药说明书或为左乙拉西坦(开浦兰,优时比公司,佐治亚州亚特兰大)制作的一年级阅读水平的儿科用药说明书。向学生提出一组标准化调查问题,以评估对副作用、药物适应症、给药频率、给药方法及说明书总体印象的理解。

结果

纳入了58名儿童。50%的儿童为男性,79%为白种人,平均年龄为9岁。成人说明书组与儿科说明书组在人口统计学方面无统计学差异。成人说明书组30%的参与者(9/30)正确说出了药物适应症,儿科说明书组79%的参与者(22/28)正确说出了药物适应症,p = 0.002。儿科说明书组93%(26/28)的参与者正确回答了给药频率问题,而成人说明书组为73%(22/30),p = 0.05。对于关于副作用和如何给药的问题,两组之间没有差异。与成人说明书组相比,儿科说明书组在可读性和对说明书理解方面的回答有显著差异,p分别为0.001和0.001。

结论

为儿科患者设计的说明书可提高对左乙拉西坦适应症的理解。