Zhou Moliang, Yang Sen, Li Xinyu, Lv Shuyu, Chen Shuhong, Marsic Ivan, Farneth Richard, Burd Randall
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Rutgers University Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery Children's National Medical Center Washington, D.C., USA.
Proc (IEEE Int Conf Healthc Inform). 2017 Aug;2017:258-267. doi: 10.1109/ICHI.2017.57. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
Trace alignment algorithms have been used in process mining for discovering the consensus treatment procedures and process deviations. Different alignment algorithms, however, may produce very different results. No widely-adopted method exists for evaluating the results of trace alignment. Existing reference-free evaluation methods cannot adequately and comprehensively assess the alignment quality. We analyzed and compared the existing evaluation methods, identifying their limitations, and introduced improvements in two reference-free evaluation methods. Our approach assesses the alignment result globally instead of locally, and therefore helps the algorithm to optimize overall alignment quality. We also introduced a novel metric to measure the alignment complexity, which can be used as a constraint on alignment algorithm optimization. We tested our evaluation methods on a trauma resuscitation dataset and provided the medical explanation of the activities and patterns identified as deviations using our proposed evaluation methods.
迹线对齐算法已用于过程挖掘,以发现共识治疗程序和过程偏差。然而,不同的对齐算法可能会产生非常不同的结果。目前还没有广泛采用的方法来评估迹线对齐的结果。现有的无参考评估方法不能充分、全面地评估对齐质量。我们分析并比较了现有的评估方法,找出了它们的局限性,并对两种无参考评估方法进行了改进。我们的方法从全局而非局部评估对齐结果,因此有助于算法优化整体对齐质量。我们还引入了一种新的指标来衡量对齐复杂度,该指标可作为对齐算法优化的约束条件。我们在创伤复苏数据集上测试了我们的评估方法,并对使用我们提出的评估方法识别为偏差的活动和模式进行了医学解释。