Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, PO Box 80140, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Nov 15;17(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0884-z.
The importance of culture for food consumption is widely acknowledged, as well as the fact that culture-based resources ("cultural capital") differ between educational groups. Since current explanations for educational inequalities in healthy and unhealthy food consumption (e.g. economic capital, social capital) are unable to fully explain this gradient, we aim to investigate a new explanation for educational inequalities in healthy food consumption, i.e. the role of cultural capital.
Data were obtained cross-sectionally by a postal survey among participants of the GLOBE study in the Netherlands in 2011 (N = 2953; response 67.1%). The survey measured respondents' highest attained educational level, food-related cultural capital (institutionalised, objectivised and incorporated cultural capital), economic capital (e.g. home ownership, financial strain), social capital (e.g. social support, health-related social leverage, interpersonal relationships), and frequency of consumption of healthy and unhealthy food products. Two general outcomes (overall healthy food consumption, and overall unhealthy food consumption), and seven specific food consumption outcomes were constructed, and prevalence ratios (PR) were estimated in Poisson regression models with robust variance.
Cultural capital was significantly associated with all food outcomes, also when social and economic capital were taken into account. Those with low levels of cultural capital were more likely to have a lower overall healthy food consumption (PR 1.35, 95% CI 1.22-1.49), a lower consumption of whole wheat bread (PR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.38), vegetables (PR 1.55, 95% CI 1.40-1.71), and meat-substitutes and fish (PR 1.74, 95% CI 1.53-1.97), and a higher consumption of fried food (PR 1.59, 95% CI 1.31-1.93). Social capital was positively associated with overall healthy food consumption, whole wheat bread consumption, and the consumption of fish and meat-substitutes, and economic capital with none of the outcomes. The PR of the lowest educational group to have a low overall healthy food consumption decreased from 1.48 (95% CI 1.28-1.73) to 1.22 (95% CI 1.04-1.43) when cultural, social and economic capital were taken into account.
Cultural capital contributed to the explanation of educational inequalities in food consumption in The Netherlands, over and above economic and social capital. The socialisation processes through which cultural capital is acquired could offer new entry-points for the promotion of healthy food consumption among low educational groups.
文化对食物消费的重要性已得到广泛认可,而且不同教育群体之间存在基于文化的资源(“文化资本”)差异。由于当前对健康和不健康食物消费的教育不平等的解释(例如经济资本、社会资本)无法完全解释这种梯度,我们旨在研究健康食物消费的教育不平等的新解释,即文化资本的作用。
通过 2011 年在荷兰 GLOBE 研究中的邮寄调查获得横截面数据(N=2953;响应率 67.1%)。该调查衡量了受访者的最高学历、与食物相关的文化资本(制度化、客观化和融入化的文化资本)、经济资本(例如自有住房、经济压力)、社会资本(例如社会支持、与健康相关的社会影响力、人际关系)以及健康和不健康食品的消费频率。构建了两个总体结果(整体健康食品消费和整体不健康食品消费)和七个特定食品消费结果,并在泊松回归模型中使用稳健方差估计了患病率比(PR)。
文化资本与所有食品消费结果均显著相关,即使考虑到社会和经济资本也是如此。文化资本水平较低的人更有可能整体健康食品消费较低(PR 1.35,95%CI 1.22-1.49),全麦面包消费较低(PR 1.21,95%CI 1.05-1.38),蔬菜消费较低(PR 1.55,95%CI 1.40-1.71),肉类替代品和鱼类消费较低(PR 1.74,95%CI 1.53-1.97),油炸食品消费较高(PR 1.59,95%CI 1.31-1.93)。社会资本与整体健康食品消费、全麦面包消费以及鱼类和肉类替代品消费呈正相关,而经济资本与所有结果均无关。考虑到文化、社会和经济资本后,最低教育组整体健康食品消费较低的患病率比从 1.48(95%CI 1.28-1.73)降至 1.22(95%CI 1.04-1.43)。
文化资本有助于解释荷兰的食物消费教育不平等,超出了经济和社会资本的解释。文化资本的获得通过社会内化过程,可以为促进低教育群体的健康食物消费提供新的切入点。