• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探究健康方面社会经济不平等的原因:荷兰全球健康观察站(GLOBE)研究

Investigating explanations of socio-economic inequalities in health: the Dutch GLOBE study.

作者信息

van Lenthe Frank J, Schrijvers Carola T M, Droomers Mariel, Joung Inez M A, Louwman Marieke J, Mackenbach Johan P

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2004 Mar;14(1):63-70. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/14.1.63.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/14.1.63
PMID:15080394
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The GLOBE study is a prospective cohort study specifically aimed at the explanation of socio-economic inequalities in health in the Netherlands. The returns of the study are reviewed after ten years of follow-up, and the studies' contribution to the development of policy measures to reduce inequalities in health in the Netherlands are described.

METHODS

The study started in 1991 with a baseline postal survey (response rate 70.1% or n=18973, 15-74 years of age). Two sub-samples of respondents to this survey were subsequently interviewed in 1991 (response 79.4% and 72.3%, n=5667). Baseline data collection included measures of socio-economic position, health and possible explanatory factors. Follow-up involved repeated postal surveys and interviews, and routinely collected data on hospital admissions, cancer incidence and mortality by cause of death.

RESULTS

Compared with higher socio-economic groups, lower socio-economic groups showed higher prevalence rates of poor self-reported health (perceived general health, health complaints, chronic conditions, disabilities), higher incidence rates of specific conditions (myocardial infarction) and higher rates of all-cause mortality. The higher prevalence of adverse material circumstances, unhealthy behaviour, adverse psychosocial characteristics, and adverse childhood circumstances in the lower socio-economic groups was important in the explanation of socio-economic inequalities in health. Socio-economic differences in health care utilization did not contribute to the explanation.

CONCLUSIONS

The GLOBE study contributed significantly to the understanding of the explanation of socio-economic inequalities in health in the Netherlands. Study results were a main source of information in the development of policy measures aimed at the reduction of socio-economic inequalities in health in the Netherlands.

摘要

背景

GLOBE研究是一项前瞻性队列研究,专门旨在解释荷兰健康方面的社会经济不平等现象。在随访十年后对该研究的成果进行了回顾,并描述了该研究对荷兰制定减少健康不平等政策措施的贡献。

方法

该研究始于1991年,采用基线邮政调查(应答率70.1%或n = 18973,年龄在15 - 74岁之间)。随后在1991年对该调查的两个受访者子样本进行了访谈(应答率分别为79.4%和72.3%,n = 5667)。基线数据收集包括社会经济地位、健康状况及可能的解释因素的测量。随访包括重复的邮政调查和访谈,并常规收集有关住院、癌症发病率和死因死亡率的数据。

结果

与社会经济地位较高的群体相比,社会经济地位较低的群体自我报告的健康状况较差(感知的总体健康、健康问题、慢性病、残疾)的患病率更高,特定疾病(心肌梗死)的发病率更高,全因死亡率也更高。社会经济地位较低的群体中不利物质环境、不健康行为、不良心理社会特征和不良童年环境的较高患病率,对于解释健康方面的社会经济不平等现象很重要。医疗保健利用方面的社会经济差异对这种解释没有作用。

结论

GLOBE研究对理解荷兰健康方面的社会经济不平等现象的解释做出了重大贡献。研究结果是荷兰制定旨在减少健康方面社会经济不平等政策措施的主要信息来源。

相似文献

1
Investigating explanations of socio-economic inequalities in health: the Dutch GLOBE study.探究健康方面社会经济不平等的原因:荷兰全球健康观察站(GLOBE)研究
Eur J Public Health. 2004 Mar;14(1):63-70. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/14.1.63.
2
A prospective cohort study investigating the explanation of socio-economic inequalities in health in The Netherlands.一项前瞻性队列研究,旨在探究荷兰健康方面社会经济不平等现象的原因。
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jan;38(2):299-308. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90399-9.
3
Does cultural capital contribute to educational inequalities in food consumption in the Netherlands? A cross-sectional analysis of the GLOBE-2011 survey.文化资本是否有助于荷兰的食品消费在教育方面的不平等?GLOBE-2011 调查的横断面分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Nov 15;17(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0884-z.
4
Cohort Profile: Understanding socioeconomic inequalities in health and health behaviours: the GLOBE study.队列简介:了解健康及健康行为中的社会经济不平等:全球社会经济与健康行为研究(GLOBE研究)
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;43(3):721-30. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt040. Epub 2013 May 27.
5
Socio-economic health differences in The Netherlands: a review of recent empirical findings.荷兰的社会经济健康差异:近期实证研究结果综述
Soc Sci Med. 1992 Feb;34(3):213-26. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90264-q.
6
Understanding socio-economic inequalities in food choice behaviour: can Maslow's pyramid help?理解食物选择行为中的社会经济不平等:马斯洛需求层次理论能有所帮助吗?
Br J Nutr. 2015 Apr 14;113(7):1139-47. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515000288. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
7
The influence of adult ill health on occupational class mobility and mobility out of and into employment in the The Netherlands.成年期健康不佳对荷兰职业阶层流动以及进出就业情况的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 1999 Aug;49(4):509-18. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00140-9.
8
[Inequalities in health in Italy].[意大利的健康不平等现象]
Epidemiol Prev. 2004 May-Jun;28(3 Suppl):i-ix, 1-161.
9
Material, psychosocial, behavioural and biomedical factors in the explanation of relative socio-economic inequalities in mortality: evidence from the HUNT study.物质因素、心理社会因素、行为因素和生物医学因素在解释相对社会经济不平等与死亡率之间的关系中的作用:来自 HUNT 研究的证据。
Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;38(5):1272-84. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp262. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
10
Childhood social class and cancer incidence: results of the globe study.儿童社会阶层与癌症发病率:全球研究结果
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(5):1131-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.035.

引用本文的文献

1
Monitoring the Use of Human Milk, the Ideal Food for Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants-A Narrative Review.监测人乳的使用情况——极低出生体重儿的理想食物:一篇叙述性综述
Foods. 2024 Feb 21;13(5):649. doi: 10.3390/foods13050649.
2
Unravelling mechanisms underlying the action principles of a community-based health promotion programme: a realist evaluation.揭示基于社区的健康促进项目行动原则背后的机制:一项现实主义评价
Arch Public Health. 2023 Jan 19;81(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01027-0.
3
The role of material and psychosocial resources in explaining socioeconomic inequalities in diet: A structural equation modelling approach.
物质资源和社会心理资源在解释饮食方面的社会经济不平等中的作用:一种结构方程建模方法。
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Jan 16;17:101025. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101025. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
A healthy view? exploring the positive health perceptions of older adults with a lower socioeconomic status using photo-elicitation interviews.健康视角?使用照片引出访谈法探究社会经济地位较低的老年人的积极健康认知。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1959496. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1959496.
5
Socioeconomic Status and Health-Compromising Behaviour: Is it All About Perception?社会经济地位与危害健康行为:一切都与认知有关吗?
Eur J Psychol. 2020 Aug 31;16(3):498-513. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v16i3.1840. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
Socioeconomic inequalities in effectiveness of and compliance to workplace health promotion programs: an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis.工作场所健康促进计划效果和依从性的社会经济不平等:个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Sep 4;17(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01002-w.
7
Self-rated health and associated factors among the oldest-old: results from a cross-sectional study in Sweden.瑞典高龄老人的自评健康状况及相关因素:一项横断面研究的结果
Arch Public Health. 2020 Feb 3;78:6. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-0389-2. eCollection 2020.
8
Socioeconomic inequalities in metabolic syndrome in the French West Indies.法国西印度群岛代谢综合征的社会经济不平等现象。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 3;19(1):1620. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7970-z.
9
Can socioeconomic health differences be explained by physical activity at work and during leisure time? Rationale and protocol of the active worker individual participant meta-analysis.工作时和闲暇时的体力活动能否解释社会经济健康差异?积极工作者个体参与者荟萃分析的原理和方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 28;8(10):e023379. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023379.
10
What's the difference? A gender perspective on understanding educational inequalities in all-cause and cause-specific mortality.有何不同?从性别视角理解全因死亡率和死因特异性死亡率方面的教育不平等。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Sep 10;18(1):1105. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5940-5.