Oude Groeniger Joost, van Lenthe Frank J, Beenackers Mariëlle A, Kamphuis Carlijn B M
Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, 3508, TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Mar 27;14(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0495-x.
The key mechanisms underlying socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intake are still poorly understood, hampering the development of interventions. An important, but sparsely mentioned mechanism is that of 'social distinction', whereby those in a higher socioeconomic position adopt dietary patterns by which they can distinguish themselves from lower socioeconomic groups. We investigated the importance of distinction as a mechanism, by testing the socioeconomic gradient in the consumption of so-called 'superfoods' and the contribution of a well-established indicator of distinction, cultural participation.
Data from participants (25-75 years) of the 2014 survey of the Dutch population-based GLOBE study were used (N = 2812). Multivariable regression models were used to analyse the association between education, income and cultural participation (e.g. visits to museums, opera, theatre, concerts) and the consumption of superfoods (spelt, quinoa and goji berries, chia seeds or wheatgrass).
The consumption of superfoods is far more prevalent among higher socioeconomic groups. Adjusting for cultural participation strongly attenuated the educational and income gradient in superfoods consumption, whereas cultural participation remained strongly associated with superfoods consumption. Those in the highest quintile of cultural participation reported the highest consumption of spelt products (OR = 2.97, 95% CI = 2.10;4.18), quinoa (OR = 3.50, 95% CI = 2.12;5.79) and goji berries, chia seeds or wheatgrass (OR = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.73;4.17).
The associations between socioeconomic position and the consumption of 'superfoods' seem to be partially driven by a process of social distinction. These findings suggest that distinction may be an important, but currently neglected mechanism in generating socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intake. It deserves a more prominent role in interventions to reduce these inequalities.
饮食摄入方面社会经济不平等背后的关键机制仍未得到充分理解,这阻碍了干预措施的制定。一个重要但很少被提及的机制是“社会区分”,即社会经济地位较高的人采用特定的饮食模式,以使自己与社会经济地位较低的群体区分开来。我们通过测试所谓“超级食物”消费中的社会经济梯度以及一个既定的区分指标——文化参与度的贡献,来研究区分作为一种机制的重要性。
使用了2014年荷兰基于人群的GLOBE研究调查中参与者(25 - 75岁)的数据(N = 2812)。多变量回归模型用于分析教育、收入和文化参与(如参观博物馆、歌剧院、剧院、音乐会)与超级食物(斯佩耳特小麦、藜麦、枸杞、奇亚籽或小麦草)消费之间的关联。
超级食物的消费在社会经济地位较高的群体中更为普遍。对文化参与度进行调整后,超级食物消费中的教育和收入梯度大幅减弱,而文化参与度仍与超级食物消费密切相关。文化参与度最高的五分之一人群中,食用斯佩耳特小麦产品的比例最高(比值比[OR]=2.97,95%置信区间[CI]=2.10;4.18),藜麦(OR = 3.50,95% CI = 2.12;5.79)以及枸杞、奇亚籽或小麦草(OR = 2.69,95% CI = 1.73;4.17)的比例也最高。
社会经济地位与“超级食物”消费之间的关联似乎部分是由社会区分过程驱动的。这些发现表明,区分可能是饮食摄入方面产生社会经济不平等的一个重要但目前被忽视的机制。在减少这些不平等的干预措施中,它应发挥更突出的作用。