• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目标零售优惠券影响 2 年内的食品购买类别。

Targeted retail coupons influence category-level food purchases over 2-years.

机构信息

Department of Marketing, University of Rhode Island, 7 Lippitt Road, 216, Kingston, RI, 02881, USA.

Department of Marketing, University of Rhode Island, 7 Lippitt Road, 204, Kingston, RI, 02881, USA.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Nov 15;15(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0744-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12966-018-0744-7
PMID:30442148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6238299/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Targeted coupons strongly influence purchasing behavior and may represent an innovative approach for improving dietary behaviors.

METHODS

The retail analytics firm, Dunnhumby, provided secondary retail data containing grocery transactions, targeted coupon exposures, and coupon use for 2500 households over 2-years. The USDA Quarterly At-Home Food Purchasing Database was used to categorize individual foods into 52 categories and combined into 12 food groups. Mixed effects linear models estimated the difference-in-difference effects of coupon exposure on category-level purchase rate/wk. pre- and post-campaign; models also tested effect modification by food category.

RESULTS

Category-level food purchases significantly increased post-campaign. Mean (SD) food purchases/wk. Among exposed households (17.34 (13.08) units/wk) vs. unexposed households (3.75 (4.59) units/wk) were higher (p < 0.001). Difference-in-difference effects of coupon exposure showed a higher increase in purchase rate among exposed vs. unexposed households (5.73 vs. 0.67, p < 0.001). Food category significantly modified the association between coupon exposure and coupon campaign. Category-level purchase rate among exposed vs. unexposed households was relatively higher in less healthful (e.g. convenience foods) vs. more healthful categories (e.g. nuts) with a 1.17 unit/wk. increase in convenience foods purchase (p < 0.001) vs. a 0.03 unit/wk. increase in nuts (p < 0.001). Exploratory analyses suggested that price elasticity of food categories for targeted coupons (1.02-2.81) was higher than previous estimates for untargeted coupons.

CONCLUSION

Across food categories, coupon exposure increased category-level purchase rate, with a relatively larger effect size for less healthful than more healthful categories. Promising results from this preliminary study suggest that experimental research is warranted to determine whether targeting with the explicit purpose of improving dietary quality can more effectively influence diet, and whether it can do so more cost effectively.

摘要

背景

目标优惠券强烈影响购买行为,可能代表着改善饮食行为的一种创新方法。

方法

零售分析公司 Dunnhumby 提供了包含杂货交易、目标优惠券曝光和 2500 户家庭 2 年优惠券使用情况的二级零售数据。美国农业部季度家庭食品购买数据库用于将个体食品分为 52 类,并合并为 12 个食品组。混合效应线性模型估计了优惠券曝光对类别水平购买率/周的差异影响。在活动前后;模型还测试了食品类别的效应修饰。

结果

类别水平的食品购买量在活动后显著增加。暴露组家庭(17.34(13.08)单位/周)的平均(SD)食品购买量/周。与未暴露组家庭(3.75(4.59)单位/周)相比更高(p<0.001)。优惠券曝光的差异影响显示,暴露组家庭的购买率增长高于未暴露组家庭(5.73 比 0.67,p<0.001)。食品类别的差异显著修饰了优惠券曝光与优惠券活动之间的关联。与未暴露组家庭相比,暴露组家庭在不太健康(如方便食品)的类别中的购买率相对较高,而在更健康的类别(如坚果)中的购买率较低,方便食品购买增加了 1.17 个单位/周。(p<0.001),而坚果购买仅增加了 0.03 个单位/周。(p<0.001)。探索性分析表明,针对食品类别的优惠券的价格弹性(1.02-2.81)高于之前针对非针对性优惠券的估计。

结论

在各个食品类别中,优惠券曝光增加了类别水平的购买率,对于不太健康的类别,其效果大小相对较大,而对于更健康的类别则较小。这项初步研究的有希望的结果表明,需要进行实验研究,以确定明确以改善饮食质量为目的的定向促销是否可以更有效地影响饮食,以及是否可以更具成本效益地实现这一目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1afa/6238299/165e7b90fdf3/12966_2018_744_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1afa/6238299/1117095cc084/12966_2018_744_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1afa/6238299/165e7b90fdf3/12966_2018_744_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1afa/6238299/1117095cc084/12966_2018_744_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1afa/6238299/165e7b90fdf3/12966_2018_744_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Targeted retail coupons influence category-level food purchases over 2-years.目标零售优惠券影响 2 年内的食品购买类别。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Nov 15;15(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0744-7.
2
The Grocery Purchase Quality Index-2016 Performs Similarly to the Healthy Eating Index-2015 in a National Survey of Household Food Purchases.2016 年杂货购买质量指数在全国家庭食品购买调查中与 2015 年健康饮食指数表现相当。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Jan;119(1):45-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.08.165. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
3
Do purchases of price promoted and generic branded foods and beverages vary according to food category and income level? Evidence from a consumer research panel.促销价格的购买和通用品牌的食品和饮料是否因食品类别和收入水平而异?来自消费者研究小组的证据。
Appetite. 2020 Jan 1;144:104481. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104481. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
4
Association Between County-Level Food Retail and Socioeconomic Environment and Nutritional Quality of Household Food Purchases, 2015.2015 年,县一级食品零售与社会经济环境对家庭食品购买营养质量的关联。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2023 May;123(5):796-808. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.10.015. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
5
Evaluating the effect of individually-targeted food incentives on grocery purchases: The smart cart study protocol for a randomized controlled cross-over trial.评估个性化食品激励对食品杂货购买的影响:一项针对随机对照交叉试验的智能购物车研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;91:105966. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105966. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
6
How causal machine learning can leverage marketing strategies: Assessing and improving the performance of a coupon campaign.因果机器学习如何助力营销策略:评估和改进优惠券活动的效果。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 11;18(1):e0278937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278937. eCollection 2023.
7
Mexican Households' Purchases of Foods and Beverages Vary by Store-Type, Taxation Status, and SES.墨西哥家庭对食品和饮料的购买因商店类型、税收状况和社会经济地位而异。
Nutrients. 2018 Aug 8;10(8):1044. doi: 10.3390/nu10081044.
8
Nutrition quality of food purchases varies by household income: the SHoPPER study.家庭收入影响食物购买的营养质量:SHoPPER 研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 26;19(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6546-2.
9
Financial incentives and purchase restrictions in a food benefit program affect the types of foods and beverages purchased: results from a randomized trial.食品福利计划中的经济激励措施和购买限制会影响所购买食品和饮料的种类:一项随机试验的结果
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Sep 16;14(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0585-9.
10
Price and convenience: The influence of supermarkets on consumption of ultra-processed foods and beverages in Brazil.价格与便利性:超市对巴西超加工食品和饮料消费的影响。
Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:381-388. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Food marketing, eating and health outcomes in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童和成人的食品营销、饮食与健康结果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Br J Nutr. 2025 Mar 28;133(6):781-805. doi: 10.1017/S0007114524000102. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
How causal machine learning can leverage marketing strategies: Assessing and improving the performance of a coupon campaign.因果机器学习如何助力营销策略:评估和改进优惠券活动的效果。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 11;18(1):e0278937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278937. eCollection 2023.
3
The impact of the consumer and neighbourhood food environment on dietary intake and obesity-related outcomes: A systematic review of causal impact studies.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of financial incentives on participants' food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial.在一项基于超市的随机对照试验中,经济激励对参与者食品购买模式的影响。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Aug 25;14(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0573-0.
2
The prospective impact of food pricing on improving dietary consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis.食品定价对改善饮食消费的前瞻性影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 1;12(3):e0172277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172277. eCollection 2017.
3
Rebates to Incentivize Healthy Nutrition Choices in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
消费者和社区食品环境对饮食摄入和肥胖相关结果的影响:因果关系影响研究的系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;299:114879. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114879. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
4
A systematic review of supermarket automated electronic sales data for population dietary surveillance.超市自动化电子销售数据在人群膳食监测中的系统评价
Nutr Rev. 2022 May 9;80(6):1711-1722. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab089.
5
Influence of Food and Beverage Companies on Retailer Marketing Strategies and Consumer Behavior.食品和饮料公司对零售商营销策略和消费者行为的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 10;17(20):7381. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207381.
用于激励补充营养援助计划中健康营养选择的回扣。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Feb;52(2S2):S161-S170. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.023.
4
The association between state bans on soda only and adolescent substitution with other sugar-sweetened beverages: a cross-sectional study.仅针对苏打水的州禁令与青少年用其他含糖饮料替代的关联:一项横断面研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Jul 27;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S7. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-12-S1-S7.
5
Making food labels social: The impact of colour of nutritional labels and injunctive norms on perceptions and choice of snack foods.让食品标签具有社交属性:营养标签颜色和禁令规范对休闲食品认知与选择的影响。
Appetite. 2015 Aug;91:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.03.034. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
6
CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors--United States, 2005-2013.美国疾病控制与预防中心国家健康报告:2005 - 2013年美国发病和死亡的主要原因以及相关行为风险和保护因素
MMWR Suppl. 2014 Oct 31;63(4):3-27.
7
Online grocery store coupons and unhealthy foods, United States.美国的网上杂货店优惠券与不健康食品
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jan 9;11:130211. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130211.
8
Supermarket discounts of low-energy density foods: effects on purchasing, food intake, and body weight.超市低价低能量密度食品折扣:对购买、食物摄入和体重的影响。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Dec;21(12):E542-8. doi: 10.1002/oby.20484. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
9
Policy interventions to promote healthy eating: a review of what works, what does not, and what is promising.促进健康饮食的政策干预措施:对有效、无效及有前景的措施的综述
Food Nutr Bull. 2011 Dec;32(4):365-75. doi: 10.1177/156482651103200408.
10
Trans fat bans and human freedom.反式脂肪禁令与人类自由。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Mar;10(3):27-32. doi: 10.1080/15265160903585636.