Lifshitz-Assaf Hila
Stern School of Business, New York University.
Adm Sci Q. 2018 Dec;63(4):746-782. doi: 10.1177/0001839217747876. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
Using a longitudinal in-depth field study at NASA, I investigate how the open, or peer-production, innovation model affects R&D professionals, their work, and the locus of innovation. R&D professionals are known for keeping their knowledge work within clearly defined boundaries, protecting it from individuals outside those boundaries, and rejecting meritorious innovation that is created outside disciplinary boundaries. The open innovation model challenges these boundaries and opens the knowledge work to be conducted by anyone who chooses to contribute. At NASA, the open model led to a scientific breakthrough at unprecedented speed using unusually limited resources; yet it challenged not only the knowledge-work boundaries but also the professional identity of the R&D professionals. This led to divergent reactions from R&D professionals, as adopting the open model required them to go through a multifaceted transformation. Only R&D professionals who underwent identity refocusing work dismantled their boundaries, truly adopting the knowledge from outside and sharing their internal knowledge. Others who did not go through that identity work failed to incorporate the solutions the open model produced. Adopting open innovation without a change in R&D professionals' identity resulted in no real change in the R&D process. This paper reveals how such processes unfold and illustrates the critical role of professional identity work in changing knowledge-work boundaries and shifting the locus of innovation.
通过在美国国家航空航天局(NASA)进行的一项纵向深入的实地研究,我探究了开放式或同行生产的创新模式如何影响研发专业人员、他们的工作以及创新的场所。研发专业人员以将其知识工作保持在明确界定的范围内、保护其免受范围之外的个人影响以及拒绝学科界限之外产生的有价值的创新而闻名。开放式创新模式挑战了这些界限,并向任何选择贡献的人开放了知识工作。在NASA,开放式模式以前所未有的速度利用异常有限的资源实现了科学突破;然而,它不仅挑战了知识工作的界限,也挑战了研发专业人员的职业身份。这导致了研发专业人员的不同反应,因为采用开放式模式要求他们经历多方面的转变。只有经历了身份重新定位工作的研发专业人员才拆除了他们的界限,真正采纳外部知识并分享他们的内部知识。其他没有经历身份工作的人未能采用开放式模式产生的解决方案。在研发专业人员身份没有改变的情况下采用开放式创新,研发过程没有真正改变。本文揭示了这些过程是如何展开的,并说明了职业身份工作在改变知识工作界限和转移创新场所方面的关键作用。