• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

打破美国国家航空航天局的知识界限:职业身份在开放式创新中的关键作用。

Dismantling Knowledge Boundaries at NASA: The Critical Role of Professional Identity in Open Innovation.

作者信息

Lifshitz-Assaf Hila

机构信息

Stern School of Business, New York University.

出版信息

Adm Sci Q. 2018 Dec;63(4):746-782. doi: 10.1177/0001839217747876. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1177/0001839217747876
PMID:30443046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6201168/
Abstract

Using a longitudinal in-depth field study at NASA, I investigate how the open, or peer-production, innovation model affects R&D professionals, their work, and the locus of innovation. R&D professionals are known for keeping their knowledge work within clearly defined boundaries, protecting it from individuals outside those boundaries, and rejecting meritorious innovation that is created outside disciplinary boundaries. The open innovation model challenges these boundaries and opens the knowledge work to be conducted by anyone who chooses to contribute. At NASA, the open model led to a scientific breakthrough at unprecedented speed using unusually limited resources; yet it challenged not only the knowledge-work boundaries but also the professional identity of the R&D professionals. This led to divergent reactions from R&D professionals, as adopting the open model required them to go through a multifaceted transformation. Only R&D professionals who underwent identity refocusing work dismantled their boundaries, truly adopting the knowledge from outside and sharing their internal knowledge. Others who did not go through that identity work failed to incorporate the solutions the open model produced. Adopting open innovation without a change in R&D professionals' identity resulted in no real change in the R&D process. This paper reveals how such processes unfold and illustrates the critical role of professional identity work in changing knowledge-work boundaries and shifting the locus of innovation.

摘要

通过在美国国家航空航天局(NASA)进行的一项纵向深入的实地研究,我探究了开放式或同行生产的创新模式如何影响研发专业人员、他们的工作以及创新的场所。研发专业人员以将其知识工作保持在明确界定的范围内、保护其免受范围之外的个人影响以及拒绝学科界限之外产生的有价值的创新而闻名。开放式创新模式挑战了这些界限,并向任何选择贡献的人开放了知识工作。在NASA,开放式模式以前所未有的速度利用异常有限的资源实现了科学突破;然而,它不仅挑战了知识工作的界限,也挑战了研发专业人员的职业身份。这导致了研发专业人员的不同反应,因为采用开放式模式要求他们经历多方面的转变。只有经历了身份重新定位工作的研发专业人员才拆除了他们的界限,真正采纳外部知识并分享他们的内部知识。其他没有经历身份工作的人未能采用开放式模式产生的解决方案。在研发专业人员身份没有改变的情况下采用开放式创新,研发过程没有真正改变。本文揭示了这些过程是如何展开的,并说明了职业身份工作在改变知识工作界限和转移创新场所方面的关键作用。

相似文献

1
Dismantling Knowledge Boundaries at NASA: The Critical Role of Professional Identity in Open Innovation.打破美国国家航空航天局的知识界限:职业身份在开放式创新中的关键作用。
Adm Sci Q. 2018 Dec;63(4):746-782. doi: 10.1177/0001839217747876. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
2
Working at the boundary: Making space for innovation in a NASA megaproject.在边界工作:为 NASA 大型项目中的创新留出空间。
Soc Stud Sci. 2019 Jun;49(3):403-431. doi: 10.1177/0306312719851557.
3
Professional identity in clinician-scientists: brokers between care and science.临床科学家的专业身份:医疗与科研之间的桥梁。
Med Educ. 2017 Jun;51(6):645-655. doi: 10.1111/medu.13241. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
4
Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.发表科学论文应采用的规则。
Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:1-3.
5
Open innovation and external sources of innovation. An opportunity to fuel the R&D pipeline and enhance decision making?开放式创新和外部创新源。是否有机会为研发管道提供动力并增强决策制定?
J Transl Med. 2018 May 8;16(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1499-2.
6
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
7
The impact of Professional Boundaries for Health Professionals (PBHP) training on knowledge, comfort, experience, and ethical decision-making: a longitudinal randomized controlled trial.健康专业人员职业界限(PBHP)培训对知识、舒适度、经验和道德决策的影响:一项纵向随机对照试验。
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Dec;39(24):2522-2529. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1236152. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
8
Risky professional boundaries. Articulations of the personal self by antenatal screening professionals.
J Health Organ Manag. 2003;17(4):264-79. doi: 10.1108/14777260310494780.
9
Invisible walls within multidisciplinary teams: Disciplinary boundaries and their effects on integrated care.多学科团队中的无形壁垒:学科界限及其对综合护理的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Feb;150:31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
10
Maintaining equilibrium in professional role identity: a grounded theory study of health visitors' perceptions of their changing professional practice context.维持专业角色认同的平衡:对保健访视员感知其不断变化的专业实践环境的扎根理论研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Jul;68(7):1526-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05910.x. Epub 2011 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The pragmatic cycle of knowledge work: Unlocking cross-domain collaboration in open innovation spaces.知识工作的务实循环:开启开放式创新空间中的跨领域协作。
Hum Relat. 2025 Feb;78(2):187-222. doi: 10.1177/00187267241234003. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
2
The mobilisation of professional identity: A scoping and lexical review.专业身份的调动:范围界定和词汇审查。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0298423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298423. eCollection 2024.
3
Rare diseases and space health: optimizing synergies from scientific questions to care.

本文引用的文献

1
Open access and global participation in science.科学的开放获取与全球参与。
Science. 2009 Feb 20;323(5917):1025. doi: 10.1126/science.1154562.
2
Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery.科学家对科学发现的抵制。
Science. 1961 Sep 1;134(3479):596-602. doi: 10.1126/science.134.3479.596.
3
Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments.作为结构化契机的技术:来自CT扫描仪观察及放射科社会秩序的证据
罕见病与太空健康:优化从科学问题到护理的协同效应。
NPJ Microgravity. 2022 Dec 22;8(1):58. doi: 10.1038/s41526-022-00224-5.
4
Accelerated innovation in crises: The role of collaboration in the development of alternative ventilators during the COVID-19 pandemic.危机中的加速创新:合作在新冠疫情期间替代呼吸机研发中的作用。
Technol Soc. 2022 Feb;68:101923. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101923. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
5
Open innovation during the COVID-19 pandemic policy responses in South Africa and Kenya.南非和肯尼亚在新冠疫情政策应对期间的开放式创新。
Polit Policy. 2022 Sep 12. doi: 10.1111/polp.12490.
6
Games-as-a-service: Conflicted identities on the new front-line of video game development.游戏即服务:电子游戏开发新前沿的身份冲突
New Media Soc. 2022 Oct;24(10):2332-2353. doi: 10.1177/1461444821995815. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
7
Involving stakeholders in research priority setting: a scoping review.让利益相关者参与研究优先级设定:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 29;7(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00318-6.
8
Leading Teams in the Digital Age: Four Perspectives on Technology and What They Mean for Leading Teams.数字时代的领导团队:关于技术的四种观点及其对领导团队的意义。
Leadersh Q. 2020 Feb;31(1). doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101377. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
9
Scaling up analogical innovation with crowds and AI.利用众包和人工智能拓展类比创新。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 5;116(6):1870-1877. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807185116.
Adm Sci Q. 1986 Mar;31(1):78-108.